Journal of Atmospheric Pollution
ISSN (Print): 2381-2982 ISSN (Online): 2381-2990 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jap Editor-in-chief: Ki-Hyun Kim
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Atmospheric Pollution. 2013, 1(1), 1-4
DOI: 10.12691/jap-1-1-1
Open AccessArticle

The Relaxed Eddy Accumulation for Estimating Aerosols Dry Deposition above Tropical Forest

Kan Khoomsab1, and Pojanie Khummongkol2

1Biology Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Phetchabun Rajabhat University, Phetchabun, Thailand

2Division of Environmental Technology, School of Energy, Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

Pub. Date: November 04, 2013

Cite this paper:
Kan Khoomsab and Pojanie Khummongkol. The Relaxed Eddy Accumulation for Estimating Aerosols Dry Deposition above Tropical Forest. Journal of Atmospheric Pollution. 2013; 1(1):1-4. doi: 10.12691/jap-1-1-1

Abstract

The relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) method was applied to estimate dry deposition fluxes and velocities of SO42- and NO3- above a tropical forest. The monthly measured concentration of NO3- was found to be greater than that of SO42-. The average dry deposition flux of NO3- was found to be greater than that of SO42. The average deposition velocities of sulfate were evaluated to be 0.30 cm s-1 during the day and 0.22 cm s-1 at night, while the highest deposition velocities of nitrate were 0.93 cm s-1 during the day and 0.54 cm s-1 at night. The deposition velocities of aerosols (SO42- and NO3-), calculated by using the resistance model, were found to be 0.49 cm s-1 during the day and 0.29 cm s-1 at night.

Keywords:
aerosols dry deposition relaxed eddy accumulation tropical forest

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 5

References:

[1]  Kajino, M. H., Nakamaya, S. U.,and Ishikama H., Observational indicatins of indirect acidification in asia: enhanced deposition of nitric acid gas expelled from the aerosol by sulfate, Annuals of Diss.Prev.Res.Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 50C., 2007,165-176.
 
[2]  Monteith, J.L. and Mike H. U., Principle of environmental physics, Elsevier Inc., USA, 2008.
 
[3]  Meyer, T.P., Luke,W.T., Meisinger, J.J., Fluxes of ammonia and sulfate over maize using relaxed eddy accumulation, Agric. For. Met, 2006,136, 203-213.
 
[4]  Businger, J. A.,Oncley, S. P., Flux measurement with conditional sampling, J. Atmos.Oceanic Tech. 1990,7, 349-352.
 
[5]  Zemmelink, H. J., Gieskes, W.W.C., Klaassen,W., de Baar, H.W.J., Dacey, J.W.H., Hintsa, E.J.,cgillis,W.R., Simultaneous use of relaxed eddy accumulation and gradient flux techniques for the measurement of sea-to-air exchange of dimethylsulfide, Atmos. Env., 2002, (36) 5709-5717.
 
[6]  Fotiadi A. K., Lohou, F., Druilhet A., Serc, D.¸ A, Said, F., Laville, P., Brut, A., Methodological development of the conditional sampling method. part II:quality control criteria of relaxed eddy accumulation flux measurements, Bound. Lay. Met., 2005, 117, 577-603.
 
[7]  Meyer, T.P., Luke, W.T., Meisinger, J.J., Fluxes of ammonia and sulfate over maize using relaxed eddy accumulation, Agric. For. Met., 2006, 136, 203-213.
 
[8]  Pryor, S.C., Larsen, S.E., Sorensen, L.L., and Barthelmie, R.J., Particle fluxes above forest: Observations, methodological considerations and method comparisons. Envir. Pollut., 2008, 152, 667-678.
 
[9]  Held, A., Edward, P., Luciana, R., Jim, S., Andrew, T., Alex, G., Relaxed eddy accumulation simulations of aerosol number fluxes and potential proxy scalars, Bound. Lay. Met., 2008, 129, 451-468.
 
[10]  Myles, L.T., Tilden, P.M., Larry, R., Relaxed eddy accumulation measurements of ammonia, nitric acid, sulfur dioxide and particulate sulfate dry deposition near Tampa, FL, USA, Environ. Res. Lett., 2007, 2, 1-8.
 
[11]  Gallagher, M.W., Nemitz, E., Dorsey, J.R., Fowler, D., Sutton, A., Flynn, M., Duyzer, J., Measurements and parameterizations of small aerosol deposition velocities to grassland, arable crops, and forest: Influence of surface roughness length on deposition, J. geophys. Res., 2002, 107.
 
[12]  Ranjit, K., Maharaj, K.K., Srivastava, S.S., Field measurements of aerosol particle dry deposition on tropical foliage at an urban site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, Jan;40(1), 135-141.
 
[13]  Zhang, L., Vet, R., Wiebe, A., Mihele, C., Sukloff, B.,Chan, E., Moran, M.D., Iqbal, S., Characterization of size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions at eight Canadian rural sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2008, 8, 7133-7151.
 
[14]  Erisman, J.W., Draaijers, G.P.J., Atmospheric deposition in relation to acidification and eutrophication, Elsevier Science, 1995.
 
[15]  Gaman, A., Rannik, U., Aalto, P., Pohja, T., Siiovola, E. and co-authors., Relaxed eddy accumulation system for size resolved aerosol particle flux measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 2004, 21, 933-943.
 
[16]  Coppale, A., Dammay, P. E., Maro, D., Talbaut, M., Connan, O., Hebert, D., Validation of aerosols dry deposition velocity models with new data, 13th Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, Paris, France, 2010, 658-661.