International Journal of Physics
ISSN (Print): 2333-4568 ISSN (Online): 2333-4576 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijp Editor-in-chief: B.D. Indu
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Physics. 2013, 1(3), 49-64
DOI: 10.12691/ijp-1-3-1
Open AccessArticle

Is Red Shift-An Index of Galactic ‘Atomic Light Emission’ Mechanism?

U. V. S. Seshavatharam1, , S. Lakshminarayana2 and B. V. S. T. Sai3

1Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri, Hyderabad, AP, India

2Department of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, AP, India

3Department of Mathematics and Comp. Science & Engg, Guntur Engg. College, Guntur, AP, India

Pub. Date: April 30, 2013

Cite this paper:
U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana and B. V. S. T. Sai. Is Red Shift-An Index of Galactic ‘Atomic Light Emission’ Mechanism?. International Journal of Physics. 2013; 1(3):49-64. doi: 10.12691/ijp-1-3-1

Abstract

By highlighting the major shortcomings of modern cosmology, in this paper, an attempt is made to verify the cosmic acceleration in a quantum mechanical approach. With reference to the valuable opinion of Edwin Hubble, redshift can be related to a new atomic phenomenon. If light is coming from the atomic matter of the galaxy, then the observed redshift can be interpreted as an index of the galactic atomic ‘light emission mechanism’. Clearly speaking, redshift may not be connected with ‘galaxy receding’. The authors propose the following: During cosmic evolution, an ‘aged’ hydrogen atom emits an energetic photon. As the age of the hydrogen atom increases, it emits photons with increased quanta of energy and thus past light quanta emitted from an old galaxy will have less energy and show a red shift with reference to our galaxy. During its journey light quanta will not lose energy and there will be no change in the light’s wavelength. If so current cosmological changes may be reflected in any existing atom. The possible assumptions are: 1) at any given cosmic time, Hubble length can be considered as the gravitational or electromagnetic interaction range. 2) Being a primordial evolving black hole and Hubble’s constant being the angular velocity, universe is always rotating with light speed. 3) In atomic and nuclear physics, atomic gravitational constant (GA) is squared Avogadro number times the Newton’s gravitational constant and is discrete as, where n =1,2,3.4) Key conceptual link that connects the gravitational force and non-gravitational forces is - the classical force limit, . Ratio of classical force limit and the imaginary electroweak force magnitude is Avogadro number is discrete and thus the imaginary electroweak force is discrete and can be expressed as (FI / n2) and it seems to be more fundamental than the electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces. 6) Discrete imaginary electroweak force may be the responsible force for revolving electron’s discrete total energy in hydrogen atom. 7) Reduced Planck’s constant increases with cosmic time. 8) It can be suggested that, fermion and its corresponding boson mass ratio is not unity but a value close to This idea can be applied to quarks, leptons, proton and the charged Higgs fermion. One can see “super symmetry” in low energies as well as high energies.

Keywords:
reduced planck’s constant hubble length hubble mass hubble volume hubble density cosmic red shift CMBR temperature classical force limit Avogadro number imaginary electroweak force magnitude atomic gravitational constant

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana, B.V.S.T. Sai. Unified Concepts in Cosmic, Atomic and Nuclear Physics. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A), 13(1): 57-65, 2013.
 
[2]  Hubble E. P, A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae, PNAS, 15, 168-173, 1929.
 
[3]  Hubble, E.P, The 200-inch telescope and some problems it may solve. PASP, 59: 153-167, 1947.
 
[4]  Bruno Leibundgut and Jesper Sollerman . A cosmological surprise: the universe accelerates. Europhysics News, 32(4), 2001.
 
[5]  P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(2): 559-606, 2003.
 
[6]  Saul Perlmutter, Supernovae, Dark Energy and the Accele-rating Universe, American Institute of Physics, Physics today, pp53-60, April 2003.
 
[7]  Joshua Frieman, Michael Turner and Dragan Huterer, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46: 85-432, 2008.
 
[8]  Mustapha Ishak, Remarks on the Formulation of the Cos-mological Constant/Dark Energy Problems, Found Phys, 37: 1470-1498, 2007.
 
[9]  J. W. Moffat, Modified Gravity Or Dark Matter? Online Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1935v2.
 
[10]  Narlikar, J.V, Vishwakarma,R.G. and Burbidge.G., Interpre-tations of the Accelerating Universe, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 114(800), 1092-1096, 2002.
 
[11]  Arman Shafielooa, Varun Sahnib and Alexei A. Starobinsky, “Is cosmic acceleration slowing down?” Phys. Rev. D, 80: 101301, 2009.
 
[12]  Narlikar J.V. Direct Particle Formulation of Mach's Principle. Einstein Studies, vol. 6: Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity, pp. 250-261 ® 1995 Birkhauser Boston, Inc. Printed in the United States.
 
[13]  Hawking S.W. A brief history of time. Bantam Dell publishing group.1998.
 
[14]  David Gross, Einstein and the search for Unification. Current science, 89(12), 25 Dec 2005.
 
[15]  P. A. M. Dirac. The cosmological constants. Nature, 139, 323, 1937.
 
[16]  P. A. M. Dirac. A new basis for cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 165, 199, 1938
 
[17]  J.K. Webb et al. Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant. Physical Review letters, 107 (19) 2011.
 
[18]  Michael J. Longo, Detection of a Dipole in the Handedness of Spiral Galaxies with Redshifts z ~ 0.04, Phys. Lett. B 699, 224-229, 2011.
 
[19]  S.-C. Su and M.-C. Chu. Is the universe rotating? Astrophysical Journal, 703(1): 354, 2009.
 
[20]  Sidharth,B.G.. Is the Universe Rotating? Prespacetime Journal., 1(7): 1168-1173, October 2010.
 
[21]  E. Kajari et al. Rotation in relativity and the propagation of light. Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", Course CLXVIII, pp. 45-148, 2009.
 
[22]  Istvan Nemeti et al. visualizing ideas about Godel-type rotating universes. Godel-type Spacetimes: History and New Developments. 2009.
 
[23]  Marcelo Samuel Berman. A General Relativistic Rotating Evolutionary Universe. Astrophys. Space Sci.314:319-321, 2008.
 
[24]  G. Chapline et al. Tommy Gold Revisited: Why Does Not The Universe Rotate? AIP Conf.Proc. 822:160-165, 2006.
 
[25]  Robert V Gentry. New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without The F-L Paradigm. CERN preprint, EXT-2003-022, 14 Apr 2003.
 
[26]  Kurt Godel. Rotating Universes in General Relativity Theory. Proceedings of the international Congress of Mathematicians in Cambridge, 1: 175-81, 1950.
 
[27]  Dmitri Rabounski. On the Speed of Rotation of Isotropic Space: Insight into the Redshift Problem. The Abraham Zelmanov Journal, 2: 208-223, 2009.
 
[28]  Mauro Dorato. On becoming cosmic time and rotating universes. Time, Reality and Experience (provisional title), Royal Institute of Philosophy Series, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
 
[29]  Yuri N. Obukhov. On physical foundations and observational effects of cosmic Rotation. Published in Colloquium on Cosmic Rotation, Eds M. Scherfner, T. Chrobok and M. Shefaat (Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag: Berlin, 2000) pp. 23-96. August 2000.
 
[30]  U.V.S. Seshavatharam, Physics of Rotating and Expanding Black Hole Universe, Progress in Physics, 2: 7-14, 2010.
 
[31]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam. The Primordial Cosmic Black Hole and the Cosmic Axis of Evil. International Journal of Astronomy, 1(2): 20-37, 2012.
 
[32]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Is Planck’s constant-a cosmological variable? Proceedings of 2-nd International Conference on Theoretical Physics. Moscow 2013. pp. 71. International Journal of Astronomy 2013, 2(1): 11-15.
 
[33]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Quantum Mechanics, Cosmic Acceleration and CMB Radiation. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A), 12(4): 17, 2012.
 
[34]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. The Reduced Planck’s Constant, Mach’s Principle, Cosmic Acceleration and the Black Hole Universe. Journal ofPhysical Science and Application (A) 2 (10): 441-447, 2012.
 
[35]  Abdus Salam. Strong Interactions, Gravitation and Cosmology. Publ. in: NATO Advanced Study Institute, Erice, June16-July 6, 1972.
 
[36]  Salam A, Sivaram C. Strong Gravity Approach to QCD and Confinement. Mod. Phys. Lett., v. A8 (4), 321-326, 1993.
 
[37]  Recami E. Elementary Particles as Micro-Universes, and “Strong Black-holes”: A Bi-Scale Approach to Gravitational and Strong Interactions. Preprint NSF-ITP-02-94. Posted in the arXives as the e-print physics/0505149, and references therein.
 
[38]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, Role of Avogadro number in grand unification. Hadronic Journal. 33(5):513, Oct.2010.
 
[39]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, to confirm the existence of atomic gravitational constant. Hadronic journal, 34(4): 379, 2011 Aug.
 
[40]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, Super Symmetry in Strong and weak interactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 19(2): 263, 2010.
 
[41]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. SUSY and strong nuclear gravity in (120-160) GeV mass range. Hadronic journal, 34(3) 277, 2011 June.
 
[42]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Strong nuclear gravity - a brief report. Hadronic journal, 34(4):431, 2011 Aug.
 
[43]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Nucleus in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. On Nucl. Phys. 56: 302, 2011.
 
[44]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Integral charge SUSY in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. On Nucl. Phys. 56: 842, 2011.
 
[45]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Atom, universe and the fundamental interactions. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) 12(5): 1, 2012.
 
[46]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Accelerating universe and the expanding atom. Hadronic journal, 35(3): 271, 2012.
 
[47]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Past, present and future of the Avogadro number. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (A) 12(7):27, 2012.
 
[48]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. To understand the four cosmological interactions. International Journal of Astronomy, 1(5): 105-113, 2012.
 
[49]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Hubble volume and the fundamental interactions. International Journal of Astronomy, 1(5): 87-100, 2012.
 
[50]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Molar electron mass and the basics of TOE. Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics, 2(6): 132-141, 2012.
 
[51]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana. Logic behind the Squared Avogadro number and SUSY. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences (IJANS) 2(2): 23-40, May 2013.
 
[52]  N. Bohr. On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules. (Part-1) Philos. Mag. 26, 1 1913.
 
[53]  N. Bohr. On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules. (Part-2, Systems containing only a Single Nucleus). Philos. Mag. 26, 476, 1913.
 
[54]  J.V. Narlikar, Introduction to cosmology, Cambridge Univ. Press, 393-400, 2002.
 
[55]  S.N.Bose. Planck’s Law and Light Quantum Hypothesis. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 26, 178. 1924. J. American Journal of Physics.Vol.44 No.11, 1976. Astrophys. Astr. 15, 3-7. 1994.
 
[56]  Mehra J and Rechenberg H. The Historical development of Quantum theory. Springer Verlog. Chapter-1. 1982.
 
[57]  C. L. Bennett et al, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5225v1.
 
[58]  Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Armitage-Caplan, C.; et al. (Planck Collaboration). “Planck 2013 results. Overview of products and scientific results” (21 March 2013). Astronomy & Astrophysics (submitted). arXiv:1303.5062 (http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5062)
 
[59]  Magueijo, João, New varying speed of light theories, Reports on the Progress of Physics, 66: 2025, 2003.
 
[60]  Geiger H and Marsden E. On a diffuse reaction of the particles. Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. A 82: 495-500, 1909.
 
[61]  P. J. Mohr and B.N. Taylor, CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants.2007.Http://physics.nist.gov/constants.
 
[62]  Michael O. Distler et al. The RMS Charge Radius of the Proton and Zemach Moments. Phys. Lett.B. 696: 343-347, 2011.
 
[63]  Ingo Sick. On the rms-radius of the proton. Phys.Lett.B576:62-67, 2003.
 
[64]  H. Yukawa. On the Interaction of Elementary Particles. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jap. 17 (48). 1935.
 
[65]  Abdus Salam. Einstein's Last Dream: The Space -Time Unification of Fundamental Forces, Physics News, 12(2):36, June 1981.
 
[66]  J. Beringer et al. Particle Data Group. Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 2012.
 
[67]  P. Roy Chowdhury et al. Modified Bethe-Weizsacker mass formula with isotonic shift and new driplines.
 
[68]  http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0405080.W. D. Myers et al. Table of Nuclear Masses according to the 1994 Thomas-Fermi Model.(from nsdssd.lbl.gov)
 
[69]  G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, The 1993 atomic mass evolution. (I) Atomic mass table. Nuclear physics, a 565, p1-65, 1993.