International Journal of Physics
ISSN (Print): 2333-4568 ISSN (Online): 2333-4576 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijp Editor-in-chief: B.D. Indu
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Physics. 2020, 8(4), 153-157
DOI: 10.12691/ijp-8-4-6
Open AccessArticle

Observation of Which-Way-2D-Cross-Double-Slit Experiments: Violation of Bohr’s Complementarity Principle

Hui Peng,

Pub. Date: November 09, 2020

Cite this paper:
Hui Peng. Observation of Which-Way-2D-Cross-Double-Slit Experiments: Violation of Bohr’s Complementarity Principle. International Journal of Physics. 2020; 8(4):153-157. doi: 10.12691/ijp-8-4-6

Abstract

Young’s one-dimension-double-slit experiment represents the basic mystery of quantum world and was extended to which-way-1D-double-slit experiment. To explore the mystery, 2D-cross-double-slit apparatuses have been proposed, which consists of more than one double-slits intersecting to each other. In this article, we report which-way-2D-cross-double-slit experiments by detecting which slit of a double-slit of 2D-cross-double-slit apparatus a photon would pass through. The experimental results show that photons passing through the detected double-slit behave as particle, while photons passing through other undetected double-slit(s) distribute as wave in the same experiment with the same apparatus. Namely the particle nature and wave distribution coexist, which violates Bohr’s complementarity principle. We suggest that photon’s “particle nature” is intrinsic, while the term “wave nature” represents a wave-like distribution, which is a consequence of movement of photon as particle. It is a challenge to interpret mathematically those observations consistently.

Keywords:
which-way-double-slit experiment which-way-cross-double-slit experiment wave-particle duality complementarity principle cross-double-slit experiment quantum mechanics

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 12

References:

[1]  R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1966, Vol. 3.
 
[2]  Joel Taylor, Scientific American, 2013.
 
[3]  S.A. Rashkovskiy, arXiv: 1302.6159v1 [quant-ph], 2013.
 
[4]  S. Eibenberger, et al., Physical Chemistry 15 (35), 2013.
 
[5]  Bartell, L. Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: On simple realizable systems for observing intermediate particle-wave behavior”. Physical Review D. 21 (6): 1698-1699, 1980.
 
[6]  Zeilinger, A. “Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics”. Reviews of Modern Physics. 71 (2): S288 S297, 1999.
 
[7]  S. Frabboni, G. Gazzadi, and G. Pozzi, Appl. Phys. L. 97, 263101, 2010.
 
[8]  H. J. W. Müller-Kirsten, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific, 2006, 14.
 
[9]  G. Greenstein and A.G. Zajonc, The Quantum Challenge: Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 1997.
 
[10]  J. Baggott, The Quantum Story: A History in. Oxford University Press, 2011.
 
[11]  R. Ionicioiu and D.R. Terno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 230406, 2011.
 
[12]  Hui Peng, open-science-repository.com/physics-45011872.html 2019.
 
[13]  Hui Peng, https://www.directtextbook.com/isbn/9781651882696 2019.
 
[14]  Hui Peng, Observations of Cross-Double-Slit Experiments, Inter. J. of Phys. 8(2), 39-41. 2020.
 
[15]  Robert Lea, “The Double Slit Experiment Demystified. Disproving the Quantum Consciousness connection", Predict, 2018.