International Journal of Physics
ISSN (Print): 2333-4568 ISSN (Online): 2333-4576 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijp Editor-in-chief: B.D. Indu
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Physics. 2019, 7(2), 31-43
DOI: 10.12691/ijp-7-2-1
Open AccessArticle

New Hypothesis on Consciousness-Brain as Quantum Processor-Synchronization of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity

Siva Prasad Kodukula1,

1Visakhapatnam, India

Pub. Date: July 17, 2019

Cite this paper:
Siva Prasad Kodukula. New Hypothesis on Consciousness-Brain as Quantum Processor-Synchronization of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. International Journal of Physics. 2019; 7(2):31-43. doi: 10.12691/ijp-7-2-1

Abstract

Latest theories on consciousness have been discussed and the drawbacks also analyzed. Some of the basics of physics have been elaborated by which a new hypothesis of consciousness has been put forth. Some of the aspects of relativity, and quantum theory have been discussed thoroughly to bring consciousness within the scope of physics. In the process, a new model of consciousness has been introduced as a hypothesis. The final outcome resembles a quantum computer and processing of information in quantum bits. Thus the processing speed has been estimated for a conscious brain. It is estimated as 144 quantum bits per second. This model explains that a conscious brain works like a projector. It explains that every living thing will act according to a ‘fundamental force of nature’ called ‘bio-force’. Its quantum particle is ‘jeeton’. The interaction between ‘jeeton’ and ‘graviton’ gives rise to consciousness. The model emphasizes that ‘mind’ is a consequence of ‘jeeton’ and the ‘matter’ is a consequence of ‘graviton’. Their entanglement gives rise to consciousness. Thus it explains the relation between ‘mind’, ‘matter’ and ‘consciousness’ in terms of physics. This will have an influence on philosophy to solve problems like ‘Hard problem’. It will be helpful to develop humanoid robots and may be helpful in study of neurosciences and medical technologies. In contrast to contemporary thought, the process of ‘observation’ has been described as two aspects of a phenomena one satisfy quantum mechanics and another satisfies relativity. Thus a novel approach to synchronization of quantum theory with relativity has been introduced. Fundamentally it is disagreeing the process of objective reduction of the Orch-OR theory in so many aspects.

Keywords:
quantum mechanics relativity film theory of the universe decoherence double relativity effect entanglement Orch-OR consciousness jeeton mind matter

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Max Velmans. (2009). How to define consciousness-and how not to define consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 139-156.
 
[2]  Ned Block. (1998). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, G. Guzeldere. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. MIT Press. 375-415.
 
[3]  David Chalmers. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2, 200-219.
 
[4]  Bohm, David (2002). Wholeness and the Implicate. Hoboken: Routledge. 186.
 
[5]  Wade, Jenny. (1996). Changes of Mind: A Holonomic Theory of the Evolution of Con sciousness. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press. 14-19.
 
[6]  S. Hameroff, R. Penrose. (2014). Consciousness in the universe A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews 11, 39-78, 41, 48, 49, 59.
 
[7]  Stroud JM. (1956). The fine structure of psychological time. Information theory in psychology. Free Press; 1956. p.174-205.
 
[8]  Penrose R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind: concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[9]  Kodukula, S.P., (2018). Plank Scale with Siva’s Constant “K”-A New Road to Grand Unification. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1179-1194.
 
[10]  Kodukula, S.P., (2019). Values of Siva’s constant ‘K’ for all fundamental forces-A review on Spin, threshold time and quantum entanglement . Journal of Modern Physics, 10, 466, 476.
 
[11]  L. E. Ballentine. (1998). Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development (World Scientific).
 
[12]  John Gamble. (2008). Foundations of Quantum Decoherence, The College of Wooster. arXiv:0805.3178v1 [quant-ph] 20 May 2008.
 
[13]  Kodukula, S.P.. (2017). Role of Observer & Consciousness on Special Theory of Re lativity and its Influence on Kinetic Energy, International Journal of physics, 5, 4, 99-109.
 
[14]  Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
 
[15]  Kodukula S.P. (2014). Super Theory of Relativity-Explanation to ‘Rest Mass of Photon’, ‘Quantum Entanglement’ and ‘Consciousness’”, American Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 3, No. 6. 232-239.
 
[16]  R. Penrose, S. Hameroff. (2011). Consciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-time Geometry and Orch OR Theory, Journal of Cosmology, Vol. 14. http://journalofcosmology.com/Consciousness160.html.
 
[17]  Carlton M. Caves and Christopher A. Fuchsy. (2005). Quantum information: How much information in a state vector. http://cds.cern.ch/record/294810/files/9601025.pdf.
 
[18]  Huping Hu & Maoxin Wu. (2007). Spin-Mediated Consciousness: Theory, Experimental Studies, Further Development & Related Topics. https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0208/0208068.pdf.