International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management
ISSN (Print): 2374-2011 ISSN (Online): 2374-2038 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijefm Editor-in-chief: Tarek Sadraoui
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management. 2014, 2(6), 253-256
DOI: 10.12691/ijefm-2-6-5
Open AccessMeta-Analysis

Bootstrapping Normal and Binomial Distributions

Acha Chigozie Kelechi1,

1Department of Statistics, Micheal Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria

Pub. Date: November 10, 2014

Cite this paper:
Acha Chigozie Kelechi. Bootstrapping Normal and Binomial Distributions. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management. 2014; 2(6):253-256. doi: 10.12691/ijefm-2-6-5

Abstract

This paper examines and compares the implications of bootstrapping normal and binomial distributions. Hypothetical data set was used aided by S-plus package. Data analysis, examination, and comparison were based on their correlation coefficients and the bootstrap estimate of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Evidence shows that both distributions behave very well as seen in the fundamental theory of statistics. Also as the bootstrap level increases, the binomial gives a lower correlation coefficient (-0.07258132), against -0.1355295 in normal distribution. It is pertinent to note that the correlation coefficient is steady as the bootstrap increases.The paper therefore focuses on the performance of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Result shows that the normal distribution gives lower standard error which suggests more reliability to the plug-in estimate. Thus, this study uses the bootstrap method to demonstrate a scenario where the normality assumption becomes stronger as the bootstrap sample sizes (100, 500, and 1000) gets larger but on approximation at two decimal places, both distributions give the same statistical inference (1000: 0.14). Therefore, binomial distribution is preferred to normal distribution in terms of their correlation coefficient but the normal distribution is preferred to binomial for carrying out further analysis in parameter estimation and other statistical inference in terms of their standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient.

Keywords:
correlation coefficients plug-in parameter normality standard error

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Acha, C. K. (2014). Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Parameter Estimation in SLR Models. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, 2014, 2(5), 175-179.
 
[2]  Acha, C. K. (2012a). Regression and Principal Component Analyses: A Comparison Using Few Regressors. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 2(1): 1-5.
 
[3]  Acha, C. K. (2012b) On Two Methods of Analyzing Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 8(4), 749-757.
 
[4]  Acha, C. K. (2010). Impact of Housing and Age of Birds on Egg Production.International Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 5(2):275-298.
 
[5]  Acha, I. A. and Acha, C. K. (2011). Interest Rates in Nigeria: An Analytical Perspective. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3); 71-81.
 
[6]  Chatfield, C. (2004).The Analysis of Time Series.- An Introduction.Chapman and Hall,London, UK.Sixth Edition.
 
[7]  Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. (2006).Elements of Information Theory.John Wiley and Sons. p. 254.
 
[8]  Kaas, R. and Buhrman, J. M. (1980).Mean, Median and Mode in Binomial Distributions. Statistica Neerlandica, 34 (1): 13-18.
 
[9]  Lehikoinen, A., Saurola, P.,Byholm, P.,Linden, A. and Valkama, J. (2010). Life history event of euasian sparrowhawk in a changing climate.Journal of Avian Biology, 41;627-636.
 
[10]  Lord, N. (2010). Binomial averages when the mean is an integer, The Mathematical Gazette, 94, 331-332.
 
[11]  MacKay, D. (2003). Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms.Cambridge University Press; First Edition.ISBN 978-0521642989.
 
[12]  O'Hara, R. B. (2009). How to make up models add up—a primer on GLMMs. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 46:124-137.
 
[13]  O'Hara, R. B., and Kotze, D. J. (2010). Do not log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1:118-122.
 
[14]  Park, S. Y. and Bera, A. K. (2009). Maximum entropy autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model. Journal of Econometrics, 150 (2): 219-230.
 
[15]  VerHoef, J. M., and Boveng, P. L. (2007). Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: How should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology, 88:2766-2772.