International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2017, 5(5), 125-131
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-5-5-3
Open AccessReview Article

Abfraction: Etiology, Treatment and Prognosis

Ahmed Mohammed Hassan1,

1Restorative Dental Science, Alfarabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Pub. Date: December 13, 2017

Cite this paper:
Ahmed Mohammed Hassan. Abfraction: Etiology, Treatment and Prognosis. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2017; 5(5):125-131. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-5-5-3

Abstract

Sound teeth constitute the main component of esthetic smile. Lesions affect the facial aspect of the teeth have their drawbacks on the individual psychological status. Abfraction affects the gingival third of the teeth on the facial surface. It mainly affects premolars and anterior teeth. Bacteria have no role in abfraction, so it may affect individuals with good oral hygiene. The aim of this review is to throw lights on the etiological causes of this lesion and possible treatment modalities. Overview: Many hypotheses describe the possible etiology of abfraction. Tooth flexure hypothesis is the most accepted one. This hypothesis assumed the occlusal load as the causative factor for abfraction as the occlusal stress concentrates at the thin enamel of the gingival third of the tooth, so enamel fractures leading to formation of wedge-shape cervical defect. This hypothesis is confirmed by the result of finite element analysis studies. Other hypothesis suggested abrasion due to tooth paste as the causative factor of this lesion, while other one suggested the erosive potential of acidic drinks. Most researchers believe that it is multifactorial disease. Many materials have been used to restore this defect. These materials include composite resin, glass ionomer, resin modified glass ionomer, direct gold, amalgam, and full coverage restoration. Each one of these materials has its advantages and disadvantages and the dental practitioner has to decide which one is more suitable for the specific condition of the patient. Conclusion: The real cause for its development is controversial till now. The choice among available restorative materials depend a great extent on the patient esthetic demand. Further study of this lesion is required.

Keywords:
abfraction abrasion erosion non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL)

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Purushotham S, Manjunath N, D’Souza ML, Shetty R. An interdisciplinary approach for the management of noncarious lesions. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016; 20 (2): 211-5.
 
[2]  Telles D, Pegoraro LF, Pereira JC. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to occlusal aspects: a clinical study. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12(1): 10-5.
 
[3]  Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: a scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 340425
 
[4]  Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y. Chemical profile of the dentin substrate in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(10): 1205-12.
 
[5]  Faye B, Kane AW, Sarr M, Lo C, Ritter AV, Grippo Jo. Noncarious cervical lesions among a non-toothbrushing population with Hansen’s disease (leprosy): initial findings. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37(8): 613-9.
 
[6]  Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year prespective. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24(1): 10-23.
 
[7]  Adeleke, Oginni A. Clinical evaluation of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2012; 2(4): 21-37.
 
[8]  Bhagabati N, Pruthi V, Nawal RR, Talwar S. Salvaging a tooth with extensive invasive cervical resorption. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015; 71(Suppl2): s594-7.
 
[9]  Dahi BL, Krogstad O, Karlsen K. An alternative treatment in cases with advanced localized attrition. J Oral Rehab. 1975; 2(3): 209-14.
 
[10]  Grippo JO. Abfraction: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1991: 3(1): 14-9.
 
[11]  Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE, Johansson A. Dental erosion and its growing importance in clinical practice: from past to present. Int J Dent. 2012: 2012: 632907.
 
[12]  Jakupovic S, Cerjakovic E, Topcic A, Ajanovic M, Prcic AK, Vukovic A. Analysis of the abfraction lesions formation mechanism by the finite element method. Acta Inform Med. 2014; 22(4): 241-5.
 
[13]  Eliguzeloglu E, Eraslan O, Omurlu H, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Effect of hybrid layer and thickness on stress distribution of cervical wedge-shaped restorations. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4(2): 160-5.
 
[14]  Roomed SA, Malik R, Dunne SM. Stress analysis of occlusal force in canine teeth and their role in the development of non-carious cervical lesions: abfraction. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 234845.
 
[15]  Pergamalian A, Rudy TE, Zaki HS, Greco CM. The association between wear facets, bruxism, and severity of facial pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(2): 194-200.
 
[16]  Johansson A, Johansson A, Omar R, Carlsson G. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35(7): 548-566.
 
[17]  Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR, Coutinho M, Francisconi PA. Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17(5): 364-9.
 
[18]  West NX, Lussi A, Seong J, Hellwig E. Dentin hypersensitivity: pain mechanisms and aetiol; ogy of exposed cervical dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17(Suppl1): S9-19.
 
[19]  Picccoli L, Besharat LK, Cassetta M, Migliau G, Di Carlo S, Pompa G. Tooth wear among patients suffering from mental disorders. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014; 5(2): 52-60.
 
[20]  Sadaf D, Ahmad Z. Role of brushing and occlusal forces in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). Int J Biomed Sci. 2004; 10(4): 265-8.
 
[21]  Vasudeva G, Bogra P. The effect of occlusal restoration and loading on the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element study. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11(3): 117-20.
 
[22]  N S, N M, Shetty A, Kumari A, Dn N. Finite element analysis of stress concentration in class V restorations of four groups of restorative materilas in mandibular premolar. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11(3): 121-6.
 
[23]  Bartlett DW, Shah P. A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res 2006; 85(4): 306-12.
 
[24]  Nascimento MM, Dilbone DA, Pereira PN, Duarte WR, Geraldelj S, Delgado AJ. Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016; 8: 79-87.
 
[25]  Hur B, Kim HC, Park JK, Versluis A. characteristics of non-ccarious cervical lesion- - an ex vivo study using micro computed tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(6): 469-74.
 
[26]  Smith BG, Knight JK. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors. Br Dent J. 1984; 157(1): 16-9.
 
[27]  Shetty SM, Shetty RG, Mattigatti S, Managoli NA, Rairam SG, Partil AM. No carious cervical lesions: abfraction. J Int Oral Health. 2013; 5(5): 143-6.
 
[28]  Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52(3): 374-80.
 
[29]  Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent. 2008; 36(10): 759-66.
 
[30]  Perez Cdos R, Gonzalez MR, Prado NA, de Miranda MS, Macêdo Mde A, Fernandes BM. Restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Dent. 2012: 2012: 687058.
 
[31]  Carlo B, Barabanti N, Piccinelli G, Faus-Matoses V, Cerutti A. Microbiological characterization and effect of resin composite in cervical lesions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9(1): e40-e45.
 
[32]  Nascimento MM, Gordan VV, Qvist V, et al. Restoration of non-carious tooth defects by dentists in the dental practice-based research network - DPBRN. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142(12): 1368–75.
 
[33]  Aw C, Lepe X, Johnson G H, Mancl L. Caracteristics of noncarious cervical lesions, A clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133(6): 725-33.
 
[34]  Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, FerrericS. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(2): 117-23.
 
[35]  Jakupovic S, Vukovic A, Korac S, Tahmiscija I, BajsmanA. The prevalence, distribution and expression of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) in permanent dentition. Mater Sociomed. 2010; 22(4): 200-4.
 
[36]  Srirekha A, Bashetty K. A comparative analysis of restorative materilas used in abfraction lesions in tooth with and without occlusal restoration: Three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16(2): 157-61.
 
[37]  Pegoraro LF, Scolaro JM, Conti PC, Telles D, Pegoraro TA. Noncarious cervical lesions in adults: prevalence and occlusal aspects. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136(12): 1694-700.
 
[38]  Lynch CD, O’Sullivan VR, Dockery P, McGillycuddy CT, Rees JS, Sloan AJ. Hunter Schreger band patterns and their implications for clinical dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(5): 359-65.
 
[39]  Cavarlho RM, Manso AP, Geraldli S, Tay FR,Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(1): 72-86.
 
[40]  Sarode GS, Sarode SC. Abfraction: A review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013; 17(2): 222-7.
 
[41]  López-Frías FJ, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martín-González J, Liamas-Carreras JM, Segura-Egea JJ. Clinical measurement of tooth wear: Tooth wear indices. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012; 4(1): e48-53.
 
[42]  Poiate IA, Vasconcellos AB, Poiate Junior E, Dias KR. Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23(2): 161-8.
 
[43]  Poole DF, Newman HN, Dibdin GH. Structure and porosity of human cervical enamel studied by polarizing microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1981; 26(12): 977-82.
 
[44]  Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Stress-induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67(5): 718-22.
 
[45]  Tyas MJ. The Class V lesion--aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995; 40(3): 167-70.
 
[46]  Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70(4): 308-14.
 
[47]  Benazzi S, Nguyen HN, Schulz D, Grosse IR, Gruppioni G, Hublin JJ, Kullmer O. The evolutionary paradox of tooth wear: simply destruction or inevitable adaptation? PLoS One. 2013; 8(4): e62263.
 
[48]  Widmalm SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil. 1982; 9(5): 445–50
 
[49]  Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent. 1992; 4Suppl: 55–64.
 
[50]  Vandana KL, Deepti M, Shaimaa M, Naveen K, Rajendra D. A finite element study to determine the occurrence of abfraction and displacement due to various occlusal forces and with different alveolar bone height. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016; 20(1): 12-6.
 
[51]  Micheli F, Fernandez M, Gatto M, Asconape J, Giannaula R, Parera IC. Bruxism secondary to chronic antidopaminergic drug exposure. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1993; 16(4): 315-23.
 
[52]  Kemperman I, Russ M, Clark WC, Kakuma T, Zanine E, Harrison K. Pain assessments in self-injurious patients with borderline personality disorder using signal detection theory. Psychiatry Res. 1997; 70(3): 175-83.
 
[53]  Al-Omiri MK, Lamey PJ, Clifford T. Impact of tooth wear on daily living. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19(6): 601-5.
 
[54]  Persson K, Axtelius B, Soderfeldt B, Ostman M. Monitoring oral health and dental attendance in an outpatient psychiatric population. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009; 16(3): 263-71.
 
[55]  Van’t Spijker A, Rodrigues JM, Kreulen CM. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22(1): 35-42.
 
[56]  Zusman SB, Ponizovsky AM, Dekel D, Masarwa AE, Ramon T, Natapov L, Grinshpoon A. An assessment of the dental health of chronic institutionalized patients with psychiatric disease in Israel. Spec Care Dentist. 2010; 30(1): 18-22.
 
[57]  Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Kiliaridis S, Carlsson GE. A system for assessing the severity and progression of occlusal tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil. 1993; 20(2): 125-31.
 
[58]  Al-Omiri MK, Harb R, Abu Hammad OA, Lamey P-J, Lynch E, Clifford TJ. Quantification of tooth wear: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent. 2010; 38(7): 560-8.
 
[59]  Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent. 1999; 27(7): 479-85.
 
[60]  Azzopardi A, Bartlett DW, Watson TF, Smith BG. A literature review of the techniques to measure tooth wear and erosion. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000; 8(3): 93-7.
 
[61]  Borčić J, Antonić R, Muhović Urek M, Petričević N, Nola-Fuchs P,. Ćatić A, Smojver I. 3-d stress analysis in first maxillary premolar. Coll Antropol. 2007; 31(4): 1025-9.
 
[62]  Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000; 31(4): 267-74.
 
[63]  Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29(2): 188-93.
 
[64]  litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK, Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analysis in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004; 14(3): 311-21.
 
[65]  Rees JS, Hammadeh M. Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004; 112(4): 347-52.
 
[66]  Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J. 2009; 54(1): 2-8.
 
[67]  Pikdoken L, Akca E, Gurbuzer B, Aydil B, Tasdelen B. Cervical wear and occlusal wear from a periodontal perspective. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(2): 95-100.
 
[68]  Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfraction: a re-evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(7): 845-50.
 
[69]  Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Wedged cervical lesions produced by toothbrushing. Am J Dent 2004; 17(4): 237-40.
 
[70]  Litonjua LA, Bush PJ, Andreana S, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Effects of occlusal load on cervical lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31(3): 225-32.
 
[71]  Abrahamsen TC. The worn dentition – pathognomonic patterns of abrasion and erosion. Int Dent J 2005; 55(4 Suppl 1): 268-76.
 
[72]  Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y. Chemical profile of the dentin substrate in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(10): 1205-12.
 
[73]  Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013; 14(3): 136-45.
 
[74]  Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexural effects on cervical restorations: a two year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991; 122(5): 41-7.
 
[75]  Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesions: myth or reality? J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15(5): 263-71.
 
[76]  Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26(1): 1-20.
 
[77]  Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: A review. J Dent 2004; 32(3): 173-96.
 
[78]  Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek M. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21(9): 864-81.
 
[79]  Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreıner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(8): 1109-18.
 
[80]  Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984; 156(12): 435-8.
 
[81]  Eliguzeloglu E, Ersalan O, Omurlu H, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. The effect of cavity shape and hybrid layer on the stress distribution of cervical composite restoration. Eur J Dent. 2011; 5(2): 180-5.
 
[82]  Santiago SL, Franco EB, Mendonça JS, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. One-year clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in non-carious cervical lesion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003; 11(3): 175-80.
 
[83]  Aw CA. Lepe X. Johnson GH. Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002: 133(6): 725-33.
 
[84]  Wood ID, Kassir AS, Brunton PA. Effect of lateral excursive movements on the progression of abfraction lesions. Oper Dent. 2009; 34(3): 273-9.
 
[85]  Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22(9): 687-92.
 
[86]  Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent. 1995; 20(1): 7-13.
 
[87]  Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress- induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75(5): 487-494.
 
[88]  Ozgünaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(11): 1037-41.
 
[89]  Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry: the glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972; 132(4): 133-5.
 
[90]  Kovarik RE, Haubenreich JE, Gore D. Glass ionomer cements: a review of composition, chemistry, and biocompatibility as a dental and medical implant material. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005; 15(6): 655-71.
 
[91]  Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(12): 1702-8.
 
[92]  Bollu IP, Hari A, Thumu J, Velagula LD, Bolla N, Kasaraneni S, Nalli SV. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between nano-ionomer, giomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement in class V cavities-CLSM study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(5): ZC66-70.
 
[93]  Mount GJ. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: review of a successful technique. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28(10): 643-50.
 
[94]  Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, , Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resinmodified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent. 2000; 28(5): 367-73.
 
[95]  Kwong SM, Tay FR, Yip HK, Kei LH, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the application of dentine adhesives to acid-conditioned sclerotic dentine. J Dent. 2000; 28(7): 515-28.
 
[96]  Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2): 112-6.
 
[97]  Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass-ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2006; 31(4): 403-8.
 
[98]  Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Perdigمo J, Gladys S, Braem M, Vanherle G. Restorative therapy for erosive lesions. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104(2): 229-40.
 
[99]  Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials. A review. Aust Den J. 2004; 49(3): 112-21.
 
[100]  Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(3): 215-35.
 
[101]  Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lamberchts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a Nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(11): 1347-57.
 
[102]  Nascimento MM, Gordan VV, Qvist V, Litaker MS, Rindal DB, Williams OD, Fellows JL, Ritchie LK Jr, Mjör IA, McClelland J, Gilbert GH; Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Reasons for placement of restorations on previously unrestored tooth surfaces by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141(4): 441-8.
 
[103]  Staninec M, Kim P, Marshall GW, Ritchie RO, Marshall SJ. Fatigue of dentin-composite interfaces with four-point bend. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(6): 799-803.
 
[104]  Vandewalle KS, Vigil G. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent. 1997; 45(3): 254-66.
 
[105]  Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69(8): 516-21.
 
[106]  Sensi LG, Marson FC, Monteiro S Jr, Baratieri LN, Caldeira de Andrada MA. Flowable composites as “filled adhesives”: a microleakage study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004; 5(4): 32-41.
 
[107]  Peumans M, DeMunck J, Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(6): 749-54.
 
[108]  Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Poymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15(2): 128-37.
 
[109]  Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as ‘filled adhesives’: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999; 30(4): 249-57.
 
[110]  Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 2001; 29(6): 435-41.
 
[111]  Rees JS, O’Dougherty D, Pullin R. The stress reducing capacity of unfilled resin in a Class V cavity. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(5): 422-27.
 
[112]  Belli S, Eskitascıoglu G, Eraslan O, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effect of hybrid layer on stress distribution in a premolar tooth restored with composite or ceramic inlay: an FEM study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 74(2): 665-68.
 
[113]  Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech 2001; 34(10): 1269-77.
 
[114]  Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson C. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002; 18(4): 295-303.
 
[115]  Eick JD, Gwinnet AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997; 8(3): 306-35.
 
[116]  Ferrari M, Goracci G, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three one bottle systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10(5): 224-30.
 
[117]  Perdigao J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997; 13(4): 218-27.
 
[118]  Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress absorbing layer in resin dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(10): 733-738.
 
[119]  Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech 2001; 34(10): 1269-77.
 
[120]  Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations- a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002; 18(4): 295-303.
 
[121]  Belli S, Eskitaşçıoğlu G, Eraslan O, Senavongse P, Tagami J. Effect of hybrid layer on stress distribution in a premolar tooth restored with composite or ceramic inlay: an FEM study. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2005; 74(2): 665-8.
 
[122]  Eligüzeloglu E, Omurlu H, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Effect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(3): 338-45.
 
[123]  Mahboub F, Fard EM, Geramipanah F, Hajimiragha H. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a bruxer patient with severly worn dentition: a clinical case report. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2009; 3(1): 28-31.
 
[124]  Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Cohen RE. Toothbrush abrasions and noncarious cervical lesions: evolving concepts. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005; 26(11): 767-76.