International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2014, 2(2), 32-35
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-2-2-2
Open AccessReview Article

The Advantages of Partial Dentures Made of Cast Framework Cr-Co toward those Made of Resin Based Dentures

Gjergj BOÇARI1, , Neada HYSENAJ1 and Alesio BOÇARI2

1Univeristy Dental Clinic, Tirana, Albania

2Private Dental Clinic “Nobel”, Tirana, Albania

Pub. Date: April 13, 2014

Cite this paper:
Gjergj BOÇARI, Neada HYSENAJ and Alesio BOÇARI. The Advantages of Partial Dentures Made of Cast Framework Cr-Co toward those Made of Resin Based Dentures. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2014; 2(2):32-35. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-2-2-2

Abstract

Many investigations have shown that the cooperation of the denture design between the dental clinic and laboratory is often inadequate, with many dentists leaving it to the technician to decide the denture design. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of the removable partial dentures, made of cast framework base of Cr-Co toward those from acrylic resin-base. Through this study, we show the importance of a good planning and design of RDP, the evaluation of direct retentions, especially those of clasps and precise attachments for their impact on the longevity of the supporting teeth and tissues in different clinical cases, classified by Kennedy. The removable partial dentures evaluated in the study are either with or without a cast framework. In this study, are taken into observation 65 prostheses from 53 patients (28 maxillary and 37 mandibular) aged 38-70 years old. We have analyzed the type of clasps used and evaluated mobility scale and periodontal and clinical conditions of the abutment teeth in each case. After clinical examination we concluded that the abutment teeth where correct choice of clasp types were applied, had a mobility scale within physiological parameters and overall better clinical conditions compared to the abutment teeth were different type of clasps were used.

Keywords:
direct retainers denture design Kennedy classification

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 7

References:

[1]  Keraj F - “Protezat parciale” – 2008.
 
[2]  Becker, C. Et al: “Evolution of Removable partial denture design.” J. Prosthodont. 3: 158-66: 1994.
 
[3]  Precisions verankerungen in der zahnarztlichen Prothetik 275-299-1983.
 
[4]  Reagan S. Et al – “Practical, aesthetic options for retention of removable partial dentures” 1996; 333-340.
 
[5]  The new Bego – “Partial denture technique” 2002.
 
[6]  Warr J.A. – “Numerical system of clasp design” J. Prosth. Denth. 1961-11.
 
[7]  Watt, MD; McGrgor AR – “Designing partial dentures.” Nosby 1996.
 
[8]  Graken WL – “Partial denture construction” 1995.
 
[9]  Zlataric DK, Čelebić A, Valentić-Peruzović M. “The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.” J Periodontol 2002; 73: 137-144.
 
[10]  Alfonco C. Toothaker; R. W. Wright et. al. “Technique to create appropriate tooth contours for removable partial dentures.” 1999; 8: 273-275.