International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2020, 8(2), 41-46
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-8-2-3
Open AccessArticle

Influence of Ceramic Thickness and Luting Agent on the Survival of Bonded Ceramic Veneers. An in-Vitro Study

Alhanoof Aldegheishem1, , Sara Aljohani2, Toleen Moawiah2 and Shaza Bishti3

1Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess NourahBint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2Dental Intern, College of Dentistry, Princess NourahBint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

3Research Associate, Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Centre for Implantology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Pub. Date: March 01, 2020

Cite this paper:
Alhanoof Aldegheishem, Sara Aljohani, Toleen Moawiah and Shaza Bishti. Influence of Ceramic Thickness and Luting Agent on the Survival of Bonded Ceramic Veneers. An in-Vitro Study. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2020; 8(2):41-46. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-8-2-3

Abstract

The purpose of thislaboratory study was to examine the compressive strength of ceramic veneers of different thicknesses bonded with two different resin cements.A total of 40 ceramic specimens (5x10mm) in dimensions were fabricated according to manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were randomly divided according to their thicknesses (1 & 2 mm) into two groups (G1, G2), with 20 samples each. Each group was further subdivided two subgroups(RelyX, G-CemLinkAce) according to luting agent applied. All specimens went through thermocycling (1500 cycles between 5-55°C) and compressive test. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.05), the highest mean compressive strength value was observed in the GC 2mm group (30.670 ± 2.992 MPa), whereas the lowest mean compressive strength value was observed in RelyX 1mm group 10.380 ± 3.278 MPa). The visual analysis data suggest that GC 2mm group was the only group that showed 100% failures as mixed.The ideal thickness of the veneer should be up to 1.0 mm for high translucency of the veneer andproper polymerization of the luting cement.

Keywords:
bonding dental ceramics luting agent polymerization compressive strength

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Addison O, Fleming GJ. The influence of cement lute, thermocycling and surface preparation on the strength of a porcelain laminate veneering material. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2004; 20: 286-292.
 
[2]  Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2003; 89: 268-274.
 
[3]  Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. Journal of dental research 1979; 58: 1364-1370.
 
[4]  Gresnigt MMM, Ozcan M, Carvalho M, Lazari P, Cune MS, Razavi P, et al. Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2017; 33: 1392-1401.
 
[5]  Sundfeld Neto D, Naves LZ, Costa AR, Correr AB, Consani S, Borges GA, et al. The Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Concentration on the Bond Strength and Morphology of the Surface and Interface of Glass Ceramics to a Resin Cement. Operative dentistry 2015; 40: 470-479.
 
[6]  McLean J. Ceramics in clinical dentistry'. British dental journal 1988; 164: 310.
 
[7]  Cattell MJ, Knowles JC, Clarke RL, Lynch E. The biaxial flexural strength of two pressable ceramic systems. Journal of dentistry 1999; 27: 183-196.
 
[8]  Gorman CM, McDevitt WE, Hill RG. Comparison of two heat-pressed all-ceramic dental materials. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2000; 16: 389-395.
 
[9]  Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig RG. Craig's restorative dental materials/edited by Ronald L. Sakaguchi, John M. Powers: Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Mosby, 2012.
 
[10]  Mackenzie L, Banerjee A. Minimally invasive direct restorations: a practical guide. Br Dent J 2017; 223: 163-171.
 
[11]  Sa TCM, de Carvalho MFF, de Sa JCM, Magalhaes CS, Moreira AN, Yamauti M. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with different thicknesses of porcelain laminate veneers: An 8-year follow-up clinical evaluation. European journal of dentistry 2018; 12: 590-593.
 
[12]  Lameira DP, Buarque e Silva WA, Andrade e Silva F, De Souza GM. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns. BioMed research international 2015; 2015: 418641.
 
[13]  Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, Pant AB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicology international 2012; 19: 225-234.
 
[14]  Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. European journal of oral sciences 2004; 112: 280-285.
 
[15]  Pilo R, Cardash HS. Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior visible light-activated resin composites. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 1992; 8: 299-304.
 
[16]  Pires JA, Cvitko E, Denehy GE, Swift EJ, Jr. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 1993; 24: 517-521.
 
[17]  Cho SH, Lopez A, Berzins DW, Prasad S, Ahn KW. Effect of Different Thicknesses of Pressable Ceramic Veneers on Polymerization of Light-cured and Dual-cured Resin Cements. The journal of contemporary dental practice 2015; 16: 347-352.
 
[18]  Chang JC, Nguyen T, Duong JH, Ladd GD. Tensile bond strengths of dual-cured cements between a glass-ceramic and enamel. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998; 79: 503-507.
 
[19]  Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1994; 72: 85-88.
 
[20]  Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Operative dentistry 1997; 22: 173-185.
 
[21]  Cox CF, Felton D, Bergenholtz G. Histopathological response of infected cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents. American journal of dentistry 1988; 1 Spec No: 189-194.
 
[22]  Mazurek K, Mierzwinska-Nastalska E, Molak R, Kozuchowski M, Pakiela Z. Strength and thickness of the layer of materials used for ceramic veneers bonding. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics 2012; 14: 75-78.
 
[23]  Elmamooz N, Eskandarizadeh A, Rahmanian E, Sarvareh Azimzadeh S. Evaluating the effect of ceramic veneer thickness on degree of conversion in three luting resin cements. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques 2017; 6: 54-60.
 
[24]  Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1990; 63: 295-300.
 
[25]  Runnacles P, Correr GM, Baratto Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. Brazilian dental journal 2014; 25: 38-42.
 
[26]  Gurel G, Morimoto S, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Sesma N. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers: outcomes of the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry 2012; 32: 625-635.
 
[27]  Linden J, Swift Jr E, Boyer D, Davis B. Photo-activation of resin cements through porcelain veneers. Journal of dental research 1991; 70: 154-157.
 
[28]  Fano L, Fano V, Ma W, Wang X, Zhu F. Hydrolytic degradation and cracks in resin‐modified glass‐ionomer cements. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 2004; 69: 87-93.