International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2019, 7(2), 44-48
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-7-2-4
Open AccessArticle

Influence of Energy and Soft Drinks on the Surface and Mechanical Properties of Nanofilled Composite Resin

Ayman M. AlGhamdi1, , Aead M. Algarni2, Rayan M. Eskandrani3 and Khulud F. Alazmi4

1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ministry of Health, AlBaha, Saudi Arabia

2Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ministry of Health, Asir, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

4Department of Orthodontist, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Pub. Date: October 17, 2019

Cite this paper:
Ayman M. AlGhamdi, Aead M. Algarni, Rayan M. Eskandrani and Khulud F. Alazmi. Influence of Energy and Soft Drinks on the Surface and Mechanical Properties of Nanofilled Composite Resin. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2019; 7(2):44-48. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-7-2-4

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of energy drinks (Redbull and Bison) and soft drinks (CocaCola and 7 Up) on the surface roughness (SR) and microhardness (MH) of Filtek Z350 nanofilled composite resin. Materials and methods: A total of 60 disk-shaped specimens were prepared from Filtek Z350 XT restorative material and randomly allocated to 5 groups (n=12). The specimens were stored in petri dish containing Redbull (Group 1); Bison (Group 2); Coca-Cola (Group 3); 7 Up (Group 4) and distilled water (Group 5/Control). The SR and hardness of the composite specimens were determined after 24 hours (n=6) and 28 d (n=6) of storage in energy and soft drinks. SR (in Ra) was measured using a non-contact optical profilometer and MH (VHN) was tested using hardness tester equipped with a Vickers diamond indenter. The data obtained was analyzed using SPSS v.20 statistical analysis software. The data was analyzed using Wilcoxon sign rank test. A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Result: Group Redbull showed maximum SR at 28 days (0.30 ± 0.11) followed by Bison at 28 days (0.21 ± 0.09). MH test results showed specimens in distilled water with increased MH at 24 hours (114 ± 9.4). The least MH was seen in Redbull (85 ± 12.3) at 28 days. Conclusion: The energy drinks have a substantially damaging effect on SR and MH compared to soft drinks and distilled water; and these effects are increased with duration of exposure.

Keywords:
resin composites nanocomposite surface roughness (SR) microhardness (MH) energy drinks soft drink

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Khan, A.A., et al., Effect of different pH solvents on micro-hardness and surface topography of dental nano-composite: An in vitro analysis. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2015. 31(4): p. 854.
 
[2]  Ferracane, J.L., Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1995. 6(4): p. 302-318.
 
[3]  Walker, R. and J. Burgess, Comparing resin-based composites. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995), 2004. 25(6): p. 424, 426, 428 passim-424, 426, 428 passim.
 
[4]  Nagem Filho, H., et al., Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Brazilian dental journal, 2003. 14(1): p. 37-41.
 
[5]  Berger, S.B., et al., Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2011. 23(1): p. 34-43.
 
[6]  Al-Samadani, K.H., Effect of energy drinks on the surface texture of nanofilled composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2013. 14(5): p. 830-835.
 
[7]  Topcu, F.T., et al., Evaluation of microhardness, surface roughness, and wear behavior of different types of resin composites polymerized with two different light sources. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials, 2010. 92(2): p. 470-478.
 
[8]  Ruddell, D., M. Maloney, and J. Thompson, Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dental Materials, 2002. 18(1): p. 72-80.
 
[9]  Erdemir, U., et al., Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2013. 21(2): p. 124-131.
 
[10]  Mitra, S.B., D. Wu, and B.N. Holmes, An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2003. 134(10): p. 1382-1390.
 
[11]  Ilday, N., Y. Bayindir, and V. Erdem, Effect of three different acidic beverages on surface characteristics of composite resin restorative materials. Materials Research Innovations, 2010. 14(5): p. 385-391.
 
[12]  Khan, A.A., et al., Influence of mouth rinses on the surface hardness of dental resin nano-composite. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2015. 31(6): p. 1485.
 
[13]  Khan, A.A., et al., Polymer matrix of fiber-reinforced composites: Changes in the semi-interpenetrating polymer network during the shelf life. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2018. 78: p. 414-419.
 
[14]  Paravina, R., et al., Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. American journal of dentistry, 2004. 17(4): p. 262-266.
 
[15]  Carvalho, L.D.d., et al., Nanofilled composite restorations with different adhesives strategies: Clinical cases. Case reports in dentistry, 2012. 2012.
 
[16]  Badra, V., et al., Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent, 2005. 30(2): p. 213-9.
 
[17]  Ferreira, P.M., et al., Impact of a novel polishing method on the surface roughness and micromorphology of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dent├íria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial, 2015. 56(1): p. 18-24.
 
[18]  Endo, T., et al., Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dental materials journal, 2010. 29(2): p. 213-223.
 
[19]  De Moraes, R.R., et al., Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2008. 17(4): p. 323-326.
 
[20]  Yanikoglu, N., Z.Y. Duymus, and B. Yilmaz, Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dental materials journal, 2009. 28(3): p. 344-351.
 
[21]  Waqar, Z., et al., Sorption rate evaluation of flowable composite materials by using different photo-activation methods: a spectroscopic analysis. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal, 2014. 34(3).
 
[22]  Hamouda, I.M., Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2011. 23(5): p. 315-322.
 
[23]  Tanthanuch, S., et al., The effect of different beverages on surface hardness of nanohybrid resin composite and giomer. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 2014. 17(3): p. 261.