International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2019, 7(1), 5-9
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-7-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Failure Load of Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with CAD/CAM Endocrown Using Different Designs

Adel A. El Badawy1, 2, , Mohammed H. Abd El Aziz1, 2 and Elsayed A. Omar1, 3

1Crowns & Bridges Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Al Azhar University

2Substitutive Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Taibah University

3Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Taif University

Pub. Date: January 25, 2019

Cite this paper:
Adel A. El Badawy, Mohammed H. Abd El Aziz and Elsayed A. Omar. Failure Load of Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with CAD/CAM Endocrown Using Different Designs. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2019; 7(1):5-9. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-7-1-2

Abstract

Statement of problem: Restoration of a severely destructed non-vital tooth is usually challenging, especially, in case of incomplete circumferential tooth structures. Materials and methods: Sixty intact maxillary central incisors were collected. All teeth were decoronated leaving 2 mm above the CEJ then were divided into two divisions (30 specimens for each) according to the radicular depth (2 mm &4 mm). Each division was divided into three groups (10 specimens for each) according to residual coronal tooth structures (circumferential, only labial and only palatal) to obtain six groups of testing. Then milling was done for (IPS e.max CAD) followed by final cementation. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Results: Specimens restored with endocrowns having 2 mm radicular length, exhibited fracture resistance better than that with 4 mm radicular length, without statistical significant difference. Endocrowns with 2 mm circumferential residual coronal tooth structures in both radicular lengths exhibited fracture resistance better than that having either labial or palatal residual coronal tooth structures with a statistically significant difference. The specimens having 2 mm labial residual coronal tooth structures in each radicular length exhibited fracture resistance better than that with 2 mm palatal residual coronal tooth structures in each radicular length with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: For restored endodontically treated maxillary central incisor by endocrown: residual 2 mm circumferential wall presented better fracture resistance than that with only residual labial or palatal wall and residual labial wall presented better fracture resistance than the palatal wall.

Keywords:
CAD CAM emax cad endocrown failure load

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Juloski J, Apicella D, and Ferrari M, “The effect of ferrule height on stress distribution within a tooth restored with fiber posts and ceramic crown: a finite element analysis,” Dent Mat 2014; 30 (12): 1304-1315.
 
[2]  Sevimli G, Cengiz S, Oruç Su. Endocrowns: Review. J Istan Univ Fac Dent 2015; 49(2): 57-63.
 
[3]  Bitter K, Kielbassa AM. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 2007; 20(6): 353-360.
 
[4]  Gresnigt MM, Özcan M, Van den M L, Schipper L, Cune MS. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater. 2016; 32: 607-714.
 
[5]  Chang KJ, Lin YS, Chang YH. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endocrowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. J Dent Sci 2009; 4(3): 110-117.
 
[6]  Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of the literature, part ii (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quint Int 2008; 39(2): 117-129.
 
[7]  Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012; 37(2): 130-136.
 
[8]  Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 3d-finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater 2013; 29(12): 309-317.
 
[9]  Roccaa G T, Dahera R, Sarattia CM, Sedlacekb R, Suchyc T, Feilzerd A.J, and Krejcia I. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns. J Dent 2018; 6: 841-850.
 
[10]  Lin CL, Chang YH, Pai CA. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 431-438.
 
[11]  Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of all-ceramic restorations. The Int J Prosth 2012; 25(1): 70-78.
 
[12]  Burcu KE, Serkan S, Ege K, Dilek H, Egemen A and Yasemin Y. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different Preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Dent mater j 2018; 37(2): 256-265.
 
[13]  Rocca GT, Daher R, Saratti CM, Sedlacek R, Suchy T, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns. J dent 2018 1; 68: 41-50.
 
[14]  Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of the literature, part ii (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quint Int 2008; 39(2): 117-129.
 
[15]  Santos Pantaleón D, Morrow BR, Cagna DR, Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure on fracture resistance and failure mode of restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119 (3): 390-396.
 
[16]  Kanat-Ertürk B, Saridağ S, Köseler E, Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2018; 37(2): 256-265.
 
[17]  Johnson AC, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, et al. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM composite and composite-ceramic occlusal veneers. J Prosthodont Res 2014; 58: 107-114.
 
[18]  Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract perio aesth dent 1995; 7(5): 83-94.
 
[19]  Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. j adhes dent 1999; 1(3): 255-265.
 
[20]  Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of Endocrowns and glass fiber post- retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012; 37(2): 130-136.
 
[21]  Solomon CS, and Osman YI. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors. South African Dental Journal 2011; 66(5): 220-223.
 
[22]  Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89 (4) 368-373.
 
[23]  Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, Dawson D. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93(4) 331-336.
 
[24]  Naumann M, Preuss A, Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: An in vitro evaluation after chewing stimulation. Acta Odontol Scand 2006; 64(1) 31-36.
 
[25]  Maccari PC, Conceicao EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15(1) 25-30.
 
[26]  Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, Dawson D. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93(4) 331-336.
 
[27]  Naumann M, Preuss A, Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: An in vitro evaluation after chewing stimulation. Acta Odontol Scand 2006; 64(1) 31-36.
 
[28]  Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95(4) 290-296.
 
[29]  Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature.JOral Rehabil. 2015; 42(3): 220-33.
 
[30]  Leung BT, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Pow EH. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental Fluorphlogopite glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 440-446.
 
[31]  Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated ceramic- network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: 495-500.
 
[32]  Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 558-67.