Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/faac Editor-in-chief: Prof. Luigi Maxmilian Caligiuri
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology. 2015, 1(2), 74-89
DOI: 10.12691/faac-1-2-1
Open AccessArticle

Gravity Based Integral Charge Quark and Higgs Super Symmetry

U. V. S. Seshavatharam1, and S. Lakshminarayana2

1Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri, Hyderabad-35, Telangana, India

2Department of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-03, AP, India

Pub. Date: July 01, 2015

Cite this paper:
U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Gravity Based Integral Charge Quark and Higgs Super Symmetry. Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology. 2015; 1(2):74-89. doi: 10.12691/faac-1-2-1

Abstract

From gravity point of view, so far no model succeeded in understanding the link between strongly interacting massive fermions and strongly interacting massive bosons/mesons. One should not forget the fact that, strongly interacting massive fermions are only playing a major role in the formation of observable luminous and non-luminous massive celestial objects. By interconnecting the strong coupling constant and gravitational constant via the Schwarzschild interaction, in this paper, the authors reviewed the basics of strong nuclear interaction and also reviewed the previously published “integral charge Quark and Higgs super symmetry” results and proposed a very simple mechanism for understanding the observed unstable baryons. For the unstable hadronic particles and unstable electro weak particles- ‘classification scheme', ‘mass spectrum' and ‘charge spectrum' are the three vital factors and these three things can be understood with ‘integral charge super symmetry’. Here the authors would like to stress the fact that, the observed Mesonic mass spectrum, Baryonic mass spectrum and Higgs mass spectrum can be reproduced with ‘integral charge Quark and Higgs super symmetry’. Important point to be noted is that without considering the currently believed ‘color' charge concept, observed unstable baryons ‘mass' and ‘charge' spectrum can be understood. By any chance if any light quark boson having integral charge couples with any integral charge baryon, then a neutral baryon can be generated. This idea is very much similar to the ‘photon absorption’ by electron. In this context, the authors produced many clear cut evidences.

Keywords:
schwarzschild interaction avogadro number electroweak interaction strong interaction and super symmetry

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Super Symmetry in Strong and Weak interactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, Vol.19, No.2, (2010), p.263-280.
 
[2]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Integral charge SUSY in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) p.842.
 
[3]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. SUSY and strong nuclear gravity in (120-160) GeV mass range. Hadronic journal, Vol-34, No 3, (2011) June, p.277-300.
 
[4]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Calculating the energy of electron in H-atom using modified SUSY physics. Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications Vol. 2, No. 2 November 2014pp. 1-13.
 
[5]  Patrick Draper et al. Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and Low-Scale SUSY Breaking. Phys. Rev. D 85, 095007 (2012).
 
[6]  Weinberg, Steven, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Super symmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Vol. 3 (1999).
 
[7]  L. Gordon Kane and M. Shifman, eds. The Super symmetric World: The Beginnings of the Theory, World Scientific, Singapore (2000).
 
[8]  Roger Penrose. Chandrasekhar, Black Holes, and Singularities. J. Astrophys. Astr. (1996) 17, 213-231.
 
[9]  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. On Stars, Their Evolution and Their Stability',Nobel Prize lecture, December 8, 1983.
 
[10]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Logic Behind the Squared Avogadro Number and SUSY. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences. Vol. 2, Issue 2, 23-40 (2013).
 
[11]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Nucleus in Strong nuclear gravity. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. On Nucl. Phys. 56: 302, 2011.
 
[12]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. On the plausibility of final unification with Avogadro Number. Prespace time journal, Vol 5, issue 10, pp1028-1041. (2014).
 
[13]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana, Role of Avogadro number in grand unification. Hadronic Journal. Vol-33, No 5, (2010) October. p 513.
 
[14]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. On fixing the magnitudes of gravitational constant and strong coupling constant. International Journal of Advanced Astronomy, 3 (1) 17-23, (2015).
 
[15]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam, and S. Lakshminarayana, On the Role of Schwarzschild Interaction in Understanding Strong Interaction and Nuclear Binding Energy. Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology, vol. 1, no. 1 (2015): 43-55.
 
[16]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam, Lakshminarayana S. Final unification with Schwarzschild’s Interaction.. Journal of Applied Physical Science International 3(1): 12-22, 2015.
 
[17]  V.M. Abazov at al. Determination of the strong coupling constant from the inclusive jet cross section in PP ollisions at √s = 1.96 TeV. Phys.Rev.D80:111107, 2009.
 
[18]  K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 38, 090001 (2014)
 
[19]  J. Mohr, B.N. Taylor, and D.B. Newell . CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants:2010” by in Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527 (2012). http://pdg.lbl.gov/2014/reviews/rpp2014-rev-phys-constants.pdf
 
[20]  Geiger H and Marsden E. On a diffuse reaction of the particles. Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. A 82: 495-500, (1909).
 
[21]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. On the Role of Up & Down Quarks in Understanding Nuclear Binding Energy. (Part I) and (Part II)). Prespacetime Journal, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 120-142. February 2015.
 
[22]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. On the role of RMS radius of proton in understanding nuclear binding energy. Journal of Applied Physical Science International, Vol.: 2, Issue. 3 , p84-100, 2015.
 
[23]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. Scale Independent Unified Quark Physics. Prespacetime Journal, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. Vol 6, issue 3, P177-192. March 2015.
 
[24]  U. V. S. Seshavatharam and S. Lakshminarayana. On the Ratio of Nuclear Binding Energy & Protons Kinetic Energy. Prespacetime Journal, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. March 2015. (To be appeared).
 
[25]  J.A. Maruhn et al., Simple Models of Many-Fermion Systems, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010. Chapter 2, page: 45-70.