American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(6), 632-637
DOI: 10.12691/education-6-6-8
Open AccessArticle

A Meta Synthesis of Content Analysis Approaches

G. Manimozhi1 and P. Srinivasan1,

1Department of Education, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India

Pub. Date: May 24, 2018

Cite this paper:
G. Manimozhi and P. Srinivasan. A Meta Synthesis of Content Analysis Approaches. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(6):632-637. doi: 10.12691/education-6-6-8


The present analyzing is an attempt to Meta synthesis of content analysis method. The content analysis method was collected by the journals like as “The qualitative Report, Google Scholar and JSTOR”. The sample consists of literature reviews based on content analysis method. Every reviews detail was noted. The reviews responses were in a synthesis. The synthesis refers information about content analysis method. Therefore the investigators categorized the content analysis method reviews. A synthesis of content analysis method review is formed in conclusion and finalizing the common approach of content analysis.

content analysis approach of content analysis meta-synthesis

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Babaei, B., & Abdi, A. (2014). Textbooks Content Analysis of Social Studies and Natural Sciences of Secondary School Based on Emotional Intelligence Components. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 309-325.
[2]  Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communications research. Glencoe: Free press publications.
[3]  Burns, N., & Grove, S.K. (2005). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique & Utilization. Elsevier Saunders, St Louis.
[4]  Carley, K. (1990). Content analysis (pp. 725-730). The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics. Edinburgh: Pergamon Press.
[5]  Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2013). Integrated Theory & Knowledge Development in Nursing-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
[6]  Gottschalk, L. A., Hausmann, C., & Brown, J. S. (1975). A computerized scoring system for use with content analysis scales. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 16(1), 77-90.
[7]  Habarth, J., Hansell, J., & Grove, T. (2011). How accurately do introductory psychology textbooks present psychoanalytic theory?. Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 16-21.
[8]  Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
[9]  Hutchins, W. J. (1982). The evolution of machine translation systems. Lawson, 21-37.
[10]  Kerlinger, F. H. (1964), Foundations of behavioural Research: Educational and Psychological Inquiry, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[11]  Krippondorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
[12]  LaBelle, J. T. (2011). Selecting ELL textbooks: A content analysis of language-teaching models. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(1), 94-110.
[13]  Lee, C. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2013). Moral education trends over 40 years: A content analysis of the Journal of Moral Education (1971-2011). Journal of Moral Education, 42(4), 399-429.
[14]  Lindkvist, K. (1981). Approaches to textual analysis. Advances in content analysis, 9, 23-42.
[15]  Lusk, D. L., & Jones, B. D. (2011). The Portrayal of Intelligence in Introductory Educational Psychology Textbooks. Teaching Educational Psychology, 7(1), 40-61.
[16]  Paisley, W. J. (1969), “Studying Style as Deviation from Encoding Norms,” in the Analysis of Communications Content: Developments in Scientific Theories and Computer Techniques, New York: Wiley, 133-46.
[17]  Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[18]  Pool, I. D. S. (1959). Trends in content analysis. (1st ed.) . Univ of Illinois Press: Ex-library edition.
[19]  Shapiro, G., & Markoff, J. (1997). A Matter of Definition'in CW Roberts (Ed.). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts.
[20]  Singh, A. A., & Shelton, K. (2011). A Content Analysis of LGBTQ Qualitative Research in Counselling: A Ten‐Year Review. Journal of Counselling & Development, 89(2), 217-226.
[21]  Taase, Y. (2012). Multiple Intelligences Theory and Iranian Textbooks: An Analysis. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 73-82.
[22]  Wininger, S. R., & Norman, A. D. (2010). Assessing coverage of maslow's theory in educational psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Teaching Educational Psychology, 6(1), 33-48.