American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(6), 596-601
DOI: 10.12691/education-6-6-3
Open AccessArticle

Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students' Comprehension of Electrochemistry Concepts through Collaborative Teaching Strategy

Kwaku Darko Amponsah1, and Chukunoye Enunuwe Ochonogor2

1Department of Science, OLA College of Education, Cape Coast, Ghana

2Department of SP & FET, Faculty of Education, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

Pub. Date: May 24, 2018

Cite this paper:
Kwaku Darko Amponsah and Chukunoye Enunuwe Ochonogor. Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students' Comprehension of Electrochemistry Concepts through Collaborative Teaching Strategy. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(6):596-601. doi: 10.12691/education-6-6-3


This paper reports on a study to determine the effectiveness of collaborative teaching on physical sciences students' comprehension of electrochemistry in the Ximhungwe circuit of the Bohlabela district in the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. The design of the teaching strategy draws upon theoretical insights into perspectives of social constructivism and empirical studies to improve upon the teaching of the main topic, specifically galvanic cells, electrolytic cells and electrode potentials. In addition, the effect of collaboration as a teaching strategy on students’ perception of their chemistry classroom environment was also investigated. A sample of 90 grade 12 physical sciences students from four intact public schools was conveniently selected to participate in the study. Students were given electrochemistry concept test (ECT) as well as chemistry classroom environment questionnaire (CCEQ) as pre-test and post-test. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) conducted showed that students taught using collaboration had significantly better acquisition of scientific conceptions related to electrochemistry than students taught using lecture method. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation also revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between achievement and students’ perception of their chemistry classroom environment. However, ANCOVA and ANOVA results indicated that there was no significant contribution of students’ perception of their chemistry classroom environment to their comprehension of electrochemistry concepts. This study provides statistical evidence on the importance of meaningful learning combined with social process to improve students’ understanding of electrochemistry.

collaboration electrochemistry electrolytic cells galvanic cells social constructivism

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Ahmad, N. J & Che Lah, Y. (2012). Improving Students’ Conceptual Understanding of a Specific Content Learning: A Designed Teaching Sequence. on 16 March, 2015.
[2]  Al-Balushi, S. M, Ambusaidi1, A. K, Al-Shuaili, A. H. & Taylor, N (2012). Omani twelfth grade students’ most common misconceptions in chemistry. Science Education International, 23(3), 221-240.
[3]  Karsli, F. Ayas, A. (2013). Is it Possible to Eliminate Alternative Conceptions and to improve Scientific Process Skills with Different Conceptual Change Methods? ‘An Example of Electrochemical Cells. Journal of Computer and Educational Research, 1(1), 1-26.
[4]  Karslı, F. & Çalık, M. (2012). Can Freshman Science Student Teachers’ Alternative Conceptions of ‘Electrochemical Cells’ Be Fully Diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23, 12, 485-491.
[5]  Özkaya, A., Üce, M., and Şahin, M. (2003). Prospective teachers' conceptual understanding of electrochemistry: Electrochemical and electrolytic cells. University Chemical Education, 7(1), 1-12.
[6]  Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521-537.
[7]  Niaz, M. (2002). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 425,439.
[8]  Yang, E., Andre, T. & Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 329-349.
[9]  Ogude, A. N. & Bradley, J. D. (1994). Ionic conduction and electrical neutrality in operating electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 29-34.
[10]  Ochonogor, C. E. (2011). Beyond the Usual Approach of Chemistry Teaching in High Schools. US-China Education Review B, 5, 643-653.
[11]  Orgill, M. & Bodner, G. (2004). What Research Tells Us About Using Analogies to Teach Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 5(1), 15-32.
[12]  Novak (2002). Meaningful Learning. Science Education. 548-571.
[13]  Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
[14]  Duit, R. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
[15]  Dykstra, D. I. J. (2005). Against realist instruction: Superficial success masking catastrophic failure and an alternative. Constructivist Foundations, 1(1), 49-60.
[16]  Suping, S. M. (2003). Conceptual change among students in science. Retrieved from Retrieved on 24 February, 2016.
[17]  Kittleson, J. M. & Southerland, S. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
[18]  Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[19]  Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[20]  Mercer, N. (2002). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
[21]  Smagorinsky, P., and O'Donnell-Allen, C. (2000). Idiocultural diversity in small groups: The role of the relational framework in collaborative learning. In P. Smagorinsky and C. D. Lee (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 165-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[22]  Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[23]  DEMP (2015). Feedback on the 2014 NSC examination and resource material in physical sciences. Mpumalanga Province: Mpumalanga Department of Education.
[24]  Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
[25]  Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A. & Leech, N. L. (2011). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis (2nd Ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Pp. 59-60.