American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2017, 5(10), 1039-1043
DOI: 10.12691/education-5-10-5
Open AccessArticle

First-Year College Students’ Knowledge in Chemistry: Is It Adequate?

Maria Teresa M. Fajardo1, and Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas1

1Department of Science Education, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Pub. Date: October 31, 2017

Cite this paper:
Maria Teresa M. Fajardo and Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas. First-Year College Students’ Knowledge in Chemistry: Is It Adequate?. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(10):1039-1043. doi: 10.12691/education-5-10-5

Abstract

A total of 502 randomly selected incoming freshmen students were asked to answer Chemical Concepts Inventory questionnaire containing 22 multiple choice questions. These students graduated from a total of 150 private and public high schools. The sample is composed of 273 female and 229 male students. The Chemical Concepts Inventory developed by Mulford was meant to measure students’ conceptual understanding of common topics taken in a general chemistry class as well as alternate conceptions on these topics. Results indicated that these sampled high school graduates were not able to fully master some basic concepts in chemistry. Female and male students have mean scores of 4.63 and 4.75 respectively. Further analysis using t test of independent samples revealed that the mean scores did not differ significantly when students are grouped according to gender and type of school. This may indicate that these students did not fully understand the concepts covered in the inventory during their high school chemistry.

Keywords:
conceptual understanding chemistry achievement alternate conceptions

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Tai, R., Sadler, P, & Loehr, J. (2005). Factors influencing success in introductory college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 42, no. 9, pp 987-1012.
 
[2]  Botch, B., Day, R., Vining, W., & Stewart, B.(2007). Effects on student achievement in general chemistry following participation in an online preparatory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 3.
 
[3]  Johnstone, A. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, Vol.1, No.1, pp 9-15.
 
[4]  Mulford, D. & Robinson, W. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal in Chemical Education, Vol. 79, No. 6.
 
[5]  Taasoobshirazi, G. & Glynn, S. (2009). College students solving chemistry problems: A theoretical model of expertise. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1070-1089.
 
[6]  Yeung, A., Read, J. & Schmid, S. (nd). Students’ learning styles and academic performance in first year chemistry. Uniserve Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings.
 
[7]  Nahum, T., Naaman, R., Hofstein, A. & Krajcik, J. (2006). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education.
 
[8]  Lewis, S. & Lewis, J. (2007). Predicting at-risk students in general chemistry: Comparing formal thought to a general achievement measure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), pp. 32-51.
 
[9]  DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 582-601.