Using Performance Task-GRASPS to Assess Student Performance in Higher Education Courses

Nuha Iter^1,

¹Teacher Qualification Program, Palestine Technical University - Khadorie, Tulkarem, Palestine

Cite this paper:
Nuha Iter. Using Performance Task-GRASPS to Assess Student Performance in Higher Education Courses. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(5):552-558. doi: 10.12691/education-5-5-12

Abstract

This qualitative study explores student ability to integrate the use of knowledge and skills and demonstrates how students utilize skills in real-world situations through performance tasks using the performance task—GRASPS (Goals, Rules, Audience, Situation, Product/Performance, Standards) model. This study was carried out in the Introduction for Education course for 44 students in a teacher qualification program. Interviews, performance task-GRASPS reports, student focus group conversations, student reflections, and student products were used. Grounded theory was employed to analyze qualitative data. Findings show that students explained many educative features, including their views and beliefs toward performance tasks and authentic assessment. Students also understood their abilities through their products and reports about their roles in real-life situations. In addition, students demonstrated what they achieved and developed by themselves, and they felt happy and enjoyed their roles in real-life situations. The students reported that the evaluation method improved their self-confidence. Diversity was observed among the products and performances; students addressed the same challenges differently. This method develops the performance of university professors in authentic assessment by establishing performance tasks and using various rubrics to assess various products. These findings indicate that teacher educators must use authentic assessments and performance tasks to make students interactive in courses and utilize rubrics in evaluation that provide students real description of their performances.

Keywords:
performance tasks-GRASPS assessment Introduction for Education course

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Biggs, J, and Tang, C (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university . New York: Society for Research into Higher Education& Open University Press.
[2]	Brookhart, S (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
[3]	Carol, A, & McTighe, J (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids. Alexandia, Virginia USA: association for supervision and curriculum development.
[4]	Cho, J, & Trent, A (2005). “backward” curriculum design and assessment: What goes around comes around, or haven't we seen this before? Taboo, 9(2), 105.
[5]	Darling-Hammond, L & Adamson, F (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
[6]	Elmgren, M, & Henriksson, A (2014). Academic Teaching . Estonia: Mediapool Print Syd AB.
[7]	Frey, H, Ketteridge,S & Marshall, S (2015). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education enhance acadimic practice. Abingdon, and New York: Routledge .
[8]	Igbape, E, & Idogho, P (2014). Performance evaluation model for quality assurance in nigeria higher education. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2213(1), 334-343.
[9]	Litchfield, B, & Dempsey, J (2015). Authentic assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(142), 65-80.
[10]	Luong-Orlando, K (2003). Authentic assessment: Designing performance-based tasks for achieving language arts outcomes. New York :Distributed i the U.S. by Stonehouse Publishers; Markham,
[11]	Mann, S (2011). Using findings from the performance appraisal literature to inform the evaluation of students in higher education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(2), 1.
[12]	McTighe, J (2017, April 27). Performance Task PD. Retrieved from Defined Learning : http://www.performancetask.com.
[13]	Miles, S, Cromer, L, & Narayan, A (2015). Applying equity theory to students' perceptions of research participation requirements. Teaching of Psychology, 42(4), 349.
[14]	Prathap, G, & Ratnavelu, K (2015). Research performance evaluation of leading higher education institutions in malaysia. Current Science, 109(6).
[15]	Robert M, & James M (2015). Quantitative Reasoning in the Context of Energy and Environment: Modeling in the real life world. Roterdam/posten/ Taipei: sense.
[16]	Szikora, P (2015). The role and ineluctability of student performance evaluation in higher education. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society. Proceedings, 8(2), 79.
[17]	Wiggins,G, & Mctighe, J (2004). Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[18]	Wiggins,G, & Mctighe, J (2008). Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook. UbD Design Guide Worksheets - MOD M.
[19]	Wiggins, G, & Mctighe, J (2005). Understanding by Design, Copyright by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). All rights reserved1703 N. Beauregard St. • Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 USA, Web site: www.ascd.org • E-mail: member@ascd.org Author guidelines: www.ascd.org/write.
[20]	Wiggins, G., & Mctighe, J, & Ebrary, I (2005). Understanding by design (Expand 2nd; 2nd; ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.