American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2017, 5(4), 384-391
DOI: 10.12691/education-5-4-6
Open AccessArticle

Educational Neuroscience, Educational Psychology, and Classroom Pedagogy as a System

Alexander Vaninsky1,

1Mathematics Department, City University of New York, Hostos Community College, Bronx, NY, USA

Pub. Date: April 14, 2017

Cite this paper:
Alexander Vaninsky. Educational Neuroscience, Educational Psychology, and Classroom Pedagogy as a System. American Journal of Educational Research. 2017; 5(4):384-391. doi: 10.12691/education-5-4-6


This paper introduces a view of educational process as a 3-layer system comprising human brain, personality psychology, and classroom pedagogy. It aims to present a classroom as a place where educational neuroscience and educational psychology meet to result in effective pedagogy. The paper demonstrates the advantages of such approach for mathematics education. Among them are understanding of mathematical anxiety as a defensive reaction of the brain on operating memory overflow, finding gifted and talented students objectively, assertion of possible limitations on the educational goals given unfavorable conditions, restricted time of information perception, limited liability of teachers and instructors for the success of their students, and opportunities for better outcomes when group learning, peer leadership, or cross-discipline teaching and learning are implemented. As examples of applications, a technology - based teaching technique MARTA and Virtual/Augmented Reality are discussed.

pedagogy of mathematics education educational neuroscience educational psychology systemic approach educational technology AR/VR teaching and learning

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Aldrich R. Neuroscience, education and the evolution of the human brain. History of Education, 42(3), 396-410, 2013.
[2]  Ansari, D., De Smedt, B., Grabner, R. Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of an Emerging Field. Neuroethics, 5, 105-117, 2012.
[3]  Ashcraft, M., Krause, J. Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 243-248, 2007.
[4]  Atkinson, R., Shiffrin, R. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K., Spence, J. The psychology of learning and motivation (Volume 2). New York: Academic Press, 89-195, 1968.
[5]  Auble, P., Franks, J., Soraci, S. Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or aha!?. Memory & Cognition, 7, 426-434, 1979.
[6]  Baker J., Martin T., Aghababyan A., Armaghanyan A., Gillam R. Cortical Activations During a Computer-Based Fraction Learning Game: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20 (3), 339-355, 2015.
[7]  Beauchamp C., Beauchamp M. Boundary as Bridge: An Analysis of the Educational Neuroscience Literature from a Boundary Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 47-6, 2013.
[8]  Bloom, B. (Ed.)., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, 1956.
[9]  Bruner, J. From joint attention to the meeting of minds. In C. Moore and P. Dunham (eds.). Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1995.
[10]  Byrnes, J., Vu, L. Educational neuroscience: Definitional, methodological, and interpretive issues. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(3), 221-234, 2015.
[11]  Cerruti C. Building a functional multiple intelligences theory to advance educational neuroscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, #950, 2013.
[12]  Chan, B., Ho, C. The cognitive profile of Chinese children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 260-279, 2010.
[13]  Chang, C., Vaninsky, A. Early College from the Instructors’ Perspective. MAA Focus, 28(2), 25, 2008.
[14]  Clark, R., Kirschner, P., Sweller, J. Putting students on the path to learning. American Educator, 36(1), 6-11, 2012.
[15]  De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Schneider, M., Verschaffel, L Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 5, 97-105, 2010.
[16]  De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R., Hannula- Sormunen, M., Schneider, M., Verschaffel, L. Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education: It takes two to Tango. Educational Research Review, 6, 232-237, 2011.
[17]  Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506, 2003.
[18]  Dewey J. How we think. New York, D.C. Heath & Co., 1910.
[19]  Dubinsky, E., Moses, R. Philosophy, Math Research, Math Ed Research, K–16 Education, and the Civil Rights Movement: A Synthesis. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3), 401-409, 2011.
[20]  Dunn, R., Dunn, K. Teaching students through their individual learning styles. Reston, VA: Reston, 1978.
[21]  Eagleman, D. Incognito. The secret lives of the brain. New York, Pantheon Books, 2011.
[22]  Edelenbosch R., Kupper F., Krabbendam L., Broerse J. Brain-based learning and educational neuroscience: Boundary work. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 40-49, 2015.
[23]  Falk, D., Lepore, F., Noe, A. The cerebral cortex of Albert Einstein: a description and preliminary analysis of unpublished photographs. Brain, 136, 1304-1327, 2013.
[24]  Fusch, D. Students with Goggles: Virtual Reality and Adaptive Learning in the Classroom. Academic Impressions, 2016. Available at
[25]  Gardner, H. Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
[26]  Geake, J. Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123-133, 2008.
[27]  Haist F., Wazny J., Toomarian E., Adamo M. Development of brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity and the relationship to formal math academic achievement. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 804-826, 2015.
[28]  Holper L., Goldin A., Shalom D., Battro A., Wolf M., Sigman M. The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher-student interactions in the Socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1-10, 2013.
[29]  Hook C., Farah M. Neuroscience for educators: What are they seeking, and what are they finding? Neuroethics, 6(2), 331-341, 2013.
[30]  Howard-Jones P., Ott M., van Leeuwen T., De Smedt B. The potential relevance of cognitive neuroscience for the development and use of technology-enhanced learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(2), 131-151, 2015.
[31]  Kalbfleisch M. Educational neuroscience, constructivism, and the mediation of learning and creativity in the 21st century. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, #133, 2015.
[32]  Knowland V., Thomas M. Educating the adult brain: How the neuroscience of learning can inform educational policy. International Review of Education, 60(1), 99-122, 2014.
[33]  Kroeger, L., Brown, R., O'Brien, B. Connecting Neuroscience, Cognitive, and Educational Theories and Research to Practice: A Review of Mathematics Intervention Programs. Early Education & Development, 23:1, 37-58, 2012.
[34]  Laughbaum, E. Capitalizing on basic brain processes in developmental Algebra – Part One. MathAMATYC Educator, 2(2), 4-7, 2011.
[35]  Lee, K., Yeong, S. H. M., Ng, S. F., Venkatraman, V., Graham, S., & Chee, M. W. L. Computing solutions to algebraic problems using a symbolic versus a schematic strategy. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 591-605, 2010.
[36]  LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G., and Bisanz, J. Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem-size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 216-230, 1996.
[37]  Liu C., Chiang W. Theory, method and practice of neuroscientific findings in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 629-646, 2014.
[38]  Navon, D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383, 1977.
[39]  Obersteiner, A., Dresler, T., Reiss, K., Vogel, A., Pekrun, R., Fallgatter, A. Bringing brain imaging to the school to assess arithmetic problem solving: chances and limitations in combining educational and neuroscientific research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42:541-554, 2010.
[40]  Osgood-Campbell E. Investigating the educational implications of embodied cognition: A model interdisciplinary inquiry in mind, brain, and education curricula. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 3-9, 2015.
[41]  Pera A. The integration of cognitive neuroscience in educational practice. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 6(1), 70-75, 2014.
[42]  Petitto, LA; Dunbar, K. New findings from educational neuroscience on bilingual brains, scientific brains, and the educated mind. In Fischer, K; Katzir, T. Building Usable Knowledge in Mind, Brain, & Education. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[43]  Piaget, J. The Psychology of Intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, 1972.
[44]  Pincham H., Matejko A., Obersteiner A., Killikelly C., Abrahao K., Benavides-Varela S., Gabriel F., Rato J., Vuillier L. Forging a new path for Educational Neuroscience: An international young-researcher perspective on combining neuroscience and educational practices. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 28-31, 2014.
[45]  Rato, J., Abreu A., Castro-Caldas A. Neuromyths in education: what is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers? Educational Research, 55(4), 441-45, 2013.
[46]  Reede, E., Bailiff, L. When Virtual Reality Meets Education. Crunch Network, 2016. Available at
[47]  Salinas, P. Augmented Reality: Opportunity for Developing Spatial. Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education, 54, 2017.
[48]  van der Meulen A., Krabbendam L., de Ruyter D. Educational Neuroscience: its Position, Aims and Expectations. British Journal of Educational Studies. 63 (2), 229-243, 2015.
[49]  van Leeuwen S., Singer W., Melloni L. Meditation increases the depth of information processing and improves the allocation of attention in space. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6:133, 2012.
[50]  Vaninsky, A. A Mathematician's View of Educational Neuroscience: A Hunt for a Mathematical Genius. Joint Mathematics Meeting, Boston, January 9-12, #1086-VF-967, 2013.
[51]  Vaninsky, A. Bridging Neuroscience and Technology for Teaching and Learning Mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator, 4(2), 4-8, 2013.
[52]  Vaninsky, A. Teaching and learning mathematics in the AR/VR environment. Joint Mathematics Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Jan 4-7, # 1125-H5-167, 2017.
[53]  Vygotsky, L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, MA: Cambridge, 1978.
[54]  Vygotsky, L. Thought and language. MIT Press, MA: Cambridge, 1962.
[55]  Wu, H. The Mis-Education of Mathematics Teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(2), 372 – 384, 2011.
[56]  Zocchi M., Pollack C. Educational Neuroethics: A Contribution from Empirical Research. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(1), 56-62, 2013.
[57]  Zhou J., Fischer K.W. Culturally Appropriate Education: Insights from Educational Neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(4), 225-231, 2013.