Exploring the Influence of Metacognition and Metaemotion Strategies on the Outcome of Students of IX Std.

Dr. P. Srinivasan^1, and M.A. Maria Pushpam¹

¹Department of Education and management, Tamil University, Thanjavur, India

Cite this paper:
Dr. P. Srinivasan and M.A. Maria Pushpam. Exploring the Influence of Metacognition and Metaemotion Strategies on the Outcome of Students of IX Std.. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(9):663-668. doi: 10.12691/education-4-9-3

Abstract

The study examined the influence of metacognition and metaemotion strategies on the outcome of students of class IX. The participants were 80 IX Std. students from Matriculation Schools in Madurai city of Tamil Nadu. Experimental design was followed for the research with 40 students in experimental group and 40 students in Control group. The sample was selected through purposive sampling technique. The level of metacognition and metaemotion were measured through metacognition assessment scale and metaemotion assessment scale. The outcome of the students were measured through Student Outcome test constructed and standardised by the investigators. The results of the study showed that metacognition and metaemotion strategies influence the outcome of students of class IX positively.

Keywords:
metacognition metaemotion strategies metacognition strategies metaemotion strategies students outcome

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Bartsch, A., Appel, M., & Storch, D. (2010). Predicting emotions and meta-emotions at the movies: The role of the need for affect in audiences’ experience of horror and drama. Communication Research, 37(2), 167-190.
[2]	Chamot, A.U. (2004). Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
[3]	Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
[4]	Douglas Harper. (2016). Online Etymology Dictionary. ‘Meta’. Retrieved, March 19, 2016, from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=meta.
[5]	Douglas Harper. (2016). Online Etymology Dictionary. ‘Emotion’.Retrieved, March 19, 2016, from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=emotion.
[6]	Ewell (2001). Retrieved, August 25, 2015 from http://www.acha.org/Topics/student_learning_outcomes.cfm.
[7]	Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
[8]	Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 243-268.
[9]	Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
[10]	Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 696-699. Retrieved, January 2, 2015 from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Metacognition_Literature_Review_Final.pdf.
[11]	Norman, E., & Furnes, B. (2014). The Concept of “Metaemotion”: What is There to Learn From Research on Metacognition?. Retrieved, June 22, 2015, from http://emr.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/10/13/1754073914552913.full.
[12]	Mitmansgruber, H., Beck, T.N., et al. (2009). When you don’t like what you feel: Experiential avoidance, mindfulness and meta-emotion in emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 448-453.
[13]	O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
[14]	Yan, Ming, W. (2010). The relations between teacher’s metaemotion, student’s bonding to school and academic performance. Retrieved, August 12, 2014, from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/133154/3/FullText.pdf?accept=1.