American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2016, 4(5), 420-426
DOI: 10.12691/education-4-5-10
Open AccessArticle

Teachers' Accountability for Adaptive Project-Based Learning

Abu-Hussain Jamal1, and Oleg Tilchin1

1Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education, Baqa El-Gharbieh, Israel

Pub. Date: April 16, 2016

Cite this paper:
Abu-Hussain Jamal and Oleg Tilchin. Teachers' Accountability for Adaptive Project-Based Learning. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(5):420-426. doi: 10.12691/education-4-5-10

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an approach to determining accountability of teachers for organizing an adaptive project-based learning (PBL) environment. The environment enables customization on performance of students. The certain phases of teacher accountability are determined. Teachers would be accountable for preparing instructional material, teaching a subject through a relevant sample-project, guiding collaborative performance of group projects, and defining course study results. The first phase associated with holding teachers accountable for preparing instructional materials for teaching of subject while performance of a sample-project by every student and performing group projects and comprises: specification of a subject, specification of the sample-project and group projects, setting initial assessments of studying of a subject. The second phase aimed at holding teachers accountable for promoting development of subject-relevant knowledge during the sample-project performance and fostering adoption of specificity of adaptive PBL by students and comprises: submitting subject material while performance of the sample-project; facilitating learning by doing, assessing of students' knowledge after completion of the sample-project. The third phase aimed at holding teachers accountable for inducing development of higher-order knowledge and collaborative skills of students and comprises: fostering self-formation of knowledge heterogeneous collaborative groups; assigning projects of different complexity levels for collaborative groups; support of forming a structure of project tasks; setting adaptive assessments of knowledge and the fixed assessment of the collaborative skill. The fourth phase pertains to teachers’ accountability for defining results of the adaptive PBL, and includes: assessing student knowledge after completing the sample-project and group projects; assessing collaborative skills; defining complex summative assessment of students.

Keywords:
adaptive project-based learning teachers’ accountability adaptive assessment

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-based Learning. Available, at: http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf.
 
[2]  Solomon, G., (2003). Project-Based Learning: A Primer. Technology and Learning, 23(6).
 
[3]  Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based learning: Definitions and Distinctions, The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based learning, 1(1), 9-20. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol1/iss1/3/.
 
[4]  Ravitz, J. (2009). Introduction: Summarizing Findings and Looking Ahead to a New Generation of PBL Research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/2/.
 
[5]  Bender, W.N. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century, Corwin.
 
[6]  Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2001). Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning, Available at: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/CL Strategies (JCCCT).pdf.
 
[7]  Reeves, B. D. (2004). Accountability for Learning: How Teachers and School Leaders Can Take Charge, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve.
 
[8]  Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Athabasca University Press.
 
[9]  Doyle, T., & Tagg, J. (2008). Helping Students Learn in a Learner-Centered Environment: A Guide to Facilitating Learning in Higher Education, Stylus Publishing.
 
[10]  Shavelson, R. (2009). Measuring College Learning Responsibly: Accountability in a New Era, Stanford University Press.
 
[11]  Quinn J., Anderson P., & Finkelstein S. (1998). Managing Professional Intellect, Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management, Harvard Business School Press, 181-205.
 
[12]  Tiwana, A. (1999). The Knowledge Management Toolkit. Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System, Prentice Hall.
 
[13]  Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical Thinking and Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education: An Analysis of Responsibility and Control Issues, Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.
 
[14]  Barkley, E., Cross, K. P., Howell, M. C. (2004). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty (Paperback), Jossey-Bass; 1 edition.
 
[15]  Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2003). Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Computer-mediated Learning with Structuring Tools (Research report No. 158). Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Institute for Empirical Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology. Research report No. 158. Available at: https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/266/1/FB_158.pdf
 
[16]  Ellis, T. J., Hafner, W. (2007). Control Structure in Project-Based Asynchronous Collaborative Learning. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
 
[17]  Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment, Solution Tree Press.
 
[18]  Bergsteiner, H. (2012). Accountability Theory Meets Accountability Practice, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
 
[19]  Samuel, M., Chiche, S. (2004). The Power of Personal Accountability: Achieve What Matters to You, Xephor Press; 1st edition.
 
[20]  Brundrett, M., & Rhodes, C. (2011). Leadership for quality and accountability in education, London & New York, Routledge.
 
[21]  Ballard, K., & Bates, A. (2008). Making a Connection between Student Achievement, Teacher Accountability, and Quality Classroom Instruction, The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 560-580. Available at: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/ballard.pdf/.
 
[22]  Abu-Hussain, J., Essawi, M., & Tilchin, O. (2014). Accountability for Project-Based Collaborative Learning, International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, 3(1), 127-135.
 
[23]  Mergendoller, J., Markham, T., Ravitz, J., & Larmer, J. (2006). Pervasive Management of Project Based Learning: Teachers as Guides and Facilitators, Buck Institute for Education. Available at: http://bie.org/images/uploads/general/25a07c3bc2b40118ba8b03334fe16d58.pdf.
 
[24]  Markham, T. (2012). Project Based Learning Design and Coaching Guide, Heart IQ Press.
 
[25]  Maltese, R. (2012). Project Based Learning, 25 Projects for 21st Century Learning, Dog Ear Publishing.
 
[26]  Graham. C. R., Misanchuk, M. (2003). Computer-Mediated Learning Groups: Benefits and Challenges to Using Groupwork in Online Learning Environments, In: T.S. Roberts, ed. Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
 
[27]  Orvis, K. L., Lassiter, A. L. R. (editors) (2008). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning; Best Practices and Principles for Instructors, Book News, Inc.
 
[28]  Stanton, P., & Fairfax, D. (2007). Establishing Individual Accountability for Learning in an Exam-less, Group Project Course, Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education1-9.
 
[29]  Knight, P.T. (2000). The value of a program-wide approach to assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 237-251.
 
[30]  Moallem, M. (2007). Assessment of complex learning tasks: A design model, In Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268357217_ASSESSMENT_OF_COMPLEX_LEARNING_TASKS _A_DESIGN_MODEL.
 
[31]  Tillema, H. (2010). Formative Assessment in Teacher Education and Teacher Professional Development, International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), Elsevier.
 
[32]  Lovie-Kitchin, J. (2001). Reflecting on assessment, In Schwartz, P. et al. (Eds), Problem-Based Learning: Case Studies, Experience and Practice. London: Kogan Page
 
[33]  Macdonald, R., & Savin-Baden, M. (2004). A briefing on assessment in problem-based learning, Learning and Teaching Support Network Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/id349_a_briefing_on_assessment_in_problembased_ learning.pdf.
 
[34]  Ellis, T. J., Hafner, W. (2008). Building a Framework to Support Project-Based Collaborative Learning Experiences in an Asynchronous Learning Network. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 167-190.
 
[35]  Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2006). Representing adaptive learning strategies in IMS learning design, Retrieved from http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/601/1/BURGOSetAl_SofiaMeeting_14mar06.pdf.
 
[36]  Soller, A. (2007). Adaptive Support for Distributed Collaboration. In: Brusilovsky Peter, Kobsa Alfred, Nejdl Wolfgang (Eds.). The Adaptive Web, Methods and Strategies Web Personalization, Springer.
 
[37]  Mennin, S. (2007). Small-group problem-based learning as a complex adaptive system, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 303-313.
 
[38]  Brusilovsky, P., Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and Intelligent Web-based Educational Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156-169.
 
[39]  Papanastasiou, E. (2014). Adaptive assessment, In Gunstone R., editor, Encyclopedia of Science Education, 1st ed., Springer.