American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2016, 4(4), 347-352
DOI: 10.12691/education-4-4-8
Open AccessReview Article

The Learners' Satisfaction of E-learning: A Review Article

Fatemeh Bahramnezhad1, Parvaneh Asgari2, , Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian3, Mahmoud Shiri4 and Fathieh Bahramnezhad5

1Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2Department of Critical Care Nursing, School, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

3Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4Department of Electronic Engineering, Islamic Azad University Iranshahr Branch, Iranshahr, Iran

5Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Islamic Azad University Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Pub. Date: April 01, 2016

Cite this paper:
Fatemeh Bahramnezhad, Parvaneh Asgari, Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian, Mahmoud Shiri and Fathieh Bahramnezhad. The Learners' Satisfaction of E-learning: A Review Article. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(4):347-352. doi: 10.12691/education-4-4-8

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim of "evaluation of the evidence on students' satisfaction of e-learning and the impact of key factors upon e-learning and their usefulness in teaching." The present systematic review was done on 16 studies from around the world. The inclusion criteria were: use of the specified terminology in the title, designing research, and searching the database of Medline, Elsevier, Proquest, Google, Google Scholar, SID, MagIran. In order to determine the quality of quantitative researches, the scale of Jaddad et al was used. The results indicated that factors influencing the learners' satisfaction of e-learning were divided into three categories: the factors related to the learner, to the instructor (curriculum designing, , and to the management and technical support. In order to increase the learners' tendency toward using this method, the effective factors should be studied and based on which this method be used.

Keywords:
satisfaction student e-learning web-based learning

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Ruiz, J.G., M.J. Mintzer, and R.M. Leipzig. “The impact of e-learning in medical education”. Academic medicine, 81(3), 207-212, 2006.
 
[2]  Hrastinski, S. “A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Asynchronous & Synchronous E-Learning.” Educause Quarterly, 4, 2008.
 
[3]  Seow, C., Stewart, B.L.Valuing the adult learner in e-learning: part one-a conceptual model for corporate settings.Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 337-345. 2005.
 
[4]  Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Lasseter, Y. “A. Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity.” Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education, 2012.
 
[5]  Zamzuri, N.H., Shahrom, M., Kasim, E.S., Nasir, H.M. and Mamat, M.N., “The Role of Cognitive Styles in Influencing the users’ Satisfaction on E-Learning System.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 427-435. 2012.
 
[6]  Gerkin, K.L., T.H. Taylor, Weatherby, F.M.The perception of learning and satisfaction of nurses in the online environment.” Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 25(1), E8-E13.2009.
 
[7]  Haydn, T. “Using new technologies to enhance teaching and learning in history.”Routledge. 2013
 
[8]  Darvish, A., Bahramnezhad, F., Keyhanian, S. “The Role of Nursing Informatics on Promoting Quality of Health Care and the Need for Appropriate Education.Global journal of health science. 6(6), 11. 2014.
 
[9]  Paavilainen, E. Salminen-Tuomaala,M. “Web-based learning for continuing nursing education of emergency unit staff.” Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 26(4),159-163. 2010.
 
[10]  Katuk, N., J. Kim, Ryu, H. “Experience beyond knowledge: Pragmatic e-learning systems design with learning experience.” Computers in Human Behavior. 29(3), 747-758. 2013.
 
[11]  Strother, J.B. “An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 3(1). 2002.
 
[12]  Kim, J. Lee , W. “Assistance and possibilities: Analysis of learning-related factors affecting the online learning satisfaction of underprivileged students.” Computers & Education. 57(4), 2395-2405. 2011.
 
[13]  DeBourgh, G.A. “Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: what matters most?.” Journal of Professional Nursing. 19(3), 149-163. 2003.
 
[14]  Lee, B.-C., J.-O. Yoon, Lee, I. “Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results.Computers & Education. 53(4), 1320-1329. 2009.
 
[15]  Ozturan, M. , Kutlu, B. “Employee satisfaction of corporate e-training programs.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5561-5565, 2010.
 
[16]  Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., Despontin, M. “The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction.” Information & management, 41(5), 543-560. 2004.
 
[17]  Keller, J.M.First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning.” Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185, 2008.
 
[18]  Cocea, M. Weibelzahl , S. “Motivation: included or excluded from E-learning. 2006.
 
[19]  Maag, M. iPod, uPod? An emerging mobile learning tool in nursing education and students’ satisfaction. in Who's learning? Whose technology? Proceedings ASCILITE 2006. 2006. Citeseer.
 
[20]  Curbelo, A.M.Agricultural Education Students’ Perception of WebCT in Puerto Rico”. 2005.Available at: webct. confex. com/webct/2005/preliminaryprogram/abstract_1176. htm.
 
[21]  Martínez-Torres, M., Toral, F. Barrero, S. “Identification of the design variables of eLearning tools.” Interacting with Computers, 23(3), 279-288. 2011.
 
[22]  Chen, S. W., Hsieh, H. C. , Huang, L. L.” Learning satisfaction of undergraduates in single-sex-dominated academic fields in Taiwan.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2487-2493. 2011.
 
[23]  Attwell, G.” Personal Learning Environments-the future of eLearning? .”eLearning papers. 2(1), 1-8. 2007.
 
[24]  Yengin, I., Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D.”E-learning success model for instructors’ satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes.” Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1396-1403. 2011.
 
[25]  Jadad, A.R., Moore, R.A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D.J.M., Gavaghan, D.J. “Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? “. Controlled clinical trials, 17(1), 1-12. 1996.
 
[26]  Moore, M.G. “Handbook of distance education.” 2013: Routledge.
 
[27]  Van Mierlo, C., “Cognitive load theory and e-learning. Zheng Yan, Encyclopedia of Cyberbehavior.” IGI Global, 2011.
 
[28]  Anderson, T.” The theory and practice of online learning.” Athabasca University Press. 2008.
 
[29]  Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.” E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning.” John Wiley & Sons. 2011.
 
[30]  Manochehr, N.N. “The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study.” Computers in Higher Education Economics Review, 18(1), 10-14. 2006.
 
[31]  Davies, J., Graff ,M. “Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663, 2005.
 
[32]  Paulsen, M.F., Nipper, S., Holmberg, C.” Online education: Learning management systems: Global e-learning in a scandinavian perspective.” 2003.
 
[33]  Cook, D.A.” The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it.” Medical teacher, 31(2), 158-162. 2009.
 
[34]  Malik, M.W., Mubeen, G.” Student satisfaction towards e-learning: influential role of key factors.” in COMSATS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH CONFERENCE (CBRC), 2nd. 2009.
 
[35]  Swan, K.” Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us. Elements of quality online education.” practice and direction, 4, 13-47. 2003.
 
[36]  Malik, M.W. “Factor Effecting Learner’s Satisfaction Towards E-Learning: A Conceptual Framework.” OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), 77-82. 2010.
 
[37]  Ahmad, M.A., Tarmudi, S.M. “Generational Differences in Satisfaction with E-Learning among Higher Learning Institution Staff.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 304-311. 2012.
 
[38]  Lin, W.S. “Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 498-507, 2012.
 
[39]  Ong, C. S. , Lai, J. Y.” Developing an instrument for measuring user satisfaction with knowledge management systems. in System Sciences.” Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE. 2004.
 
[40]  Overbaugh, R.C., Nickel, C.E.” A comparison of student satisfaction and value of academic community between blended and online sections of a university-level educational foundations course.The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 164-174. 2011.
 
[41]  Park, J.-H. ,Choi ,H.J.” Differences in personal characteristics, family and organizational supports, and learner satisfaction between dropouts and persistent learners of online program. in World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.” 2007.
 
[42]  Cyr, D.” Modeling web site design across cultures: relationships to trust, satisfaction, and e-loyalty. “Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 47-72. 2008.
 
[43]  Leen, E.A., Lang, F.R.” Motivation of computer based learning across adulthood.” Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 975-983, 2013.
 
[44]  Park, J. H., Choi, H.J. “Factors Influencing Adult Learners' Decision to Drop Out or Persist in Online Learning.Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217. 2009
 
[45]  Brouwers, M.C., Makarski, J, Levinson, A.J.” Study protocol A randomized trial to evaluate e-learning interventions designed to improve learner's performance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy with the AGREE II.”Implementation Science, 5, 2010.
 
[46]  Rosenblatt, M.A.” The educational effectiveness of problem-based learning discussions as evaluated by learner-assessed satisfaction and practice change.” Journal of clinical anesthesia, 16(8), 596-601. 2004.
 
[47]  Donkor, F.” Assessment of learner acceptance and satisfaction with video-based instructional materials for teaching practical skills at a distance.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 74-92, 2011.
 
[48]  Wang, Y. S., Wang, H.-Y, Shee, D.Y.”Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792-1808. 2007.
 
[49]  Prineus, M., Cini, M. “Assessing learning in online education: the role of technology in improving student outcomes.” 2011.
 
[50]  Khan, B.H. “Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation.”: IGI Global. 2005.
 
[51]  Isik, O.” E-learning satisfaction factors. in Proceedings of 39th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute.” 2008.
 
[52]  Felix, U.” E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: the need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches.” ReCALL, 17(01), 85-100. 2005.
 
[53]  Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T. and Schreurs, J., “E-learning and constructivism: From theory to application.” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 91-109. 2009.
 
[54]  Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y. and Yeh, D., “What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.Computers & education, 50(4),1183-1202. 2008.
 
[55]  Selim, H.M.” Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models.Computers & Education, 49(2),396-413. 2007.