Comparing the Effectiveness of Four Interventions for the Support of Students with Learning Disabilities in Acquiring Arithmetic Combinations of Multiplication and Division

Afroditi Teli^1, and Ioannis Agaliotis¹

¹Social and Educational Policy Department University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece

Cite this paper:
Afroditi Teli and Ioannis Agaliotis. Comparing the Effectiveness of Four Interventions for the Support of Students with Learning Disabilities in Acquiring Arithmetic Combinations of Multiplication and Division. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(4):294-301. doi: 10.12691/education-4-4-1

Abstract

The present study examined the effectiveness of four instructional interventions for teaching arithmetic combinations of multiplication and division to students with arithmetic combinations of multiplication and division to students with Learning Disabilities. The basic intervention, through which the control group was instructed, was based on six fundamental principles of effective instruction. A combination of this basic intervention and an alternative grouping and presentation form of arithmetic combinations constituted the intervention for the 1st experimental group. The addition of fact finding strategies to the intervention for the 1st experimental group yielded the intervention used for the 2nd experimental group. Finally, the intervention through which the 3rd experimental group was supported consisted of the 2nd experimental group’s intervention plus components of number sense. The results showed that the majority of students of all groups presented significant improvement in learning the arithmetic combinations, while no significant differences were found among groups. However, in some groups differentiation was observed regarding the final performance in multiplication or division arithmetic combinations, probably due to the nature of the interaction of certain instructional techniques and the specific characteristics of the two arithmetic operations.

Keywords:
learning disabilities arithmetic combinations effective instruction fact strategies number sense

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Montague, M.M., (2007). Self-Regulation and Mathematics Instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 75-83.
[2]	Garnett, K., (1992). Developing Fluency with Basic Number Facts: Intervention for Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7-21.
[3]	Agaliotis, I., (2011). Instruction of Mathematics in Special Education: Nature and Educational management of mathematical difficulties. Athens: Gregori (in Greek).
[4]	Baroody, A.J., (2006). Why Children Have Difficulties Mastering the Basic Number Combinations and How to Help Them. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13, 22-32.
[5]	Agaliotis, I., Dimitrakopoulos Th., Theodore H., Pesli B. & Charisi A. (2003). Alternative Teaching Basic Arithmetic Facts of Multiplication in Children with Specific Learning Difficulties. Education Sciences, (3), 53-66.
[6]	Bryant, B.R., Pedrotty Bryant, D., Porterfield, J., Shih Dennis, M., Falcomata, T., Valentine, C., Brewer, C., & Bell, K., (2014). The Effects of a Tier 3 Intervention on the Mathematics Performance of Second Grade Students With Severe Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 1-13.
[7]	Woodward J. (2006). Developing Automaticity in Multiplication Facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Journal of Disability Quarterly, 40, 270-281.
[8]	Dowker A., (2009). Use of derived fact strategies by children with mathematical difficulties. Cognitive Development, 24, 401-410.
[9]	Wilson, A.J., Revkin, S.K., Cohen, D., Cohen, L., and Dehaene, S. (2006). An open trial assessment of ‘The number race’, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functioning, 2(1), 19-30.
[10]	Canobi, K.H., (2004). Individual differences in children’s addition and subtraction knowledge. Cognitive Development, 19, 81-93.
[11]	Geary D. C., Hoard M.K., Nugent L. and Bailey D.H. (2011). Mathematical Cognition Deficits in Children With Learning Disabilities and Persistent Low Achievement: A Five-Year Prospective Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (1), 206-223.
[12]	Flores, M., Hinton, V., & Strozier, S. (2014). Teaching Subtraction and Multiplication with Regrouping Using the Concrete-Representational- Abstract Sequence and Strategic Instruction Model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(2), 75-88.
[13]	Fuchs L., Fuchs D., Powell S., Seethaler P., Cirino P. & Fletcher J. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31(2): 79–92.
[14]	Ketterlin-Geller, L.R., Chard D.J., & Fien, H., (2008). Making Connections in Mathematics. Conceptual Mathematics Intervention for Low-Performing Students. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 33-45.
[15]	Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P., (2003). Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/ Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-409.
[16]	Griffin S., (2004). Teaching Number Sense. Improving Achievement in Math and Science, 61(5), 39-42.
[17]	Doadler, C. T., & Fien, H. (2013). Explicit Mathematics Instruction. What Teachers Can Do for Teaching Students With Mathematics Difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(5), 276-285.
[18]	Jones R.S.P., & Eayrs C.B., (1992). The Use of Errorless Learning Procedures in Teaching People with a Learning Disability. A Critical Review. Mental Handicap Research, 5(2), 204-212.
[19]	Gersten, R., Chard, D.J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S.K., Morhy, P., and Flojo, J., (2009). Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202-1242.
[20]	Miller, S.P. and Hudson, P.J., (2007). Using Evidence-Based Practices to Build Mathematics Competence Related to Conceptual, Procedural, and Declarative Knowledge. Learning Disabilities Practice, 22(1), 47-57.
[21]	Graham, L., Bellert, A., Thomas, J., and Pegg, J., (2007). QuickSmart: A Basic Academic Skills Intervention for Middle School Students with Learning Difficulties. JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 40(5), 410-419.
[22]	Van Luit, J.E.H., and Naglieri, J.A., (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER Program for Teaching Special Children Multiplication and Division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 98-107.
[23]	Zhang, D., Ping Xin, Y., and Si, L., (2011). Transition from Intuitive to Advanced Strategies in Multiplicative Reasoning for Students with Math Difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, XX(X), 1-15.
[24]	Baroody A.J., (1999). Children’s Relational Knowledge of Addition and Subtraction, COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 17(2), 137-175.
[25]	Iseman, J.S., and Naglieri, J.A., (2011). A Cognitive Strategy Instruction to Improve Math Calculation for Children with ADHD and LD: A Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(2), 184-195.
[26]	Van Luit J.H. and Schopman E.A.M., (2000). Improving Early Numeracy of Young Children with Special Educational Needs, Remedial and Special Education, 21(1), 27-40.
[27]	Cowan, R., and Powell, D., (2013). The Contributions of Domain-General and Numerical Factors to Third-Grade Arithmetic Skills and Mathematical Learning Disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1-16.
[28]	Tournaki N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 449-11.
[29]	Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S., (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. WORK-LEARNING RESEARCH, 1-9.
[30]	Ho, A.D. (2009). A Nonparametric Framework for Comparing Trends and Gaps across Tests. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS 34(2), 201-228.
[31]	Fritz, C., Morris, P., & Richler, J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 141(1), 2-18.
[32]	Re, A.M., Pedron, M., Tressoldi, P.E., Lucangeli, D., (2014). Response to Secific Training for Students with Different Levels of Mathematical Difficulties. Council for Exceptional Children, 80(3), 1-12.
[33]	Codding, R.S., Burns, M.K., and Lukito, G., (2011). Meta-Analysis of Mathematic Basic-Fact Fluency Interventions: A Component Analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 36-47.
[34]	Kroesbergen, E.H., and Van Luit, J.E., (2003). Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs, A Meta-Analysis. REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 24(2), 97-114.
[35]	Methe, S.A., Kilgus, S.P., Neiman, C., Riley-Tillman, T.C., (2012). Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Basic Mathematics Computation in Single-case Research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 230-253.
[36]	Carr, M. Taasoobshirazi, G., Stroud, R., and Royer, M., (2011). Combined fluency and cognitive strategies instruction improves mathematics achievement in early elementary school. Contemporary Education Psychology, 36, 323-333.
[37]	Fuchs, L.S., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Cirino, P.T., Fletcher, J.M., Fuchs, D., and Hamlett, C.L., (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89-100.
[38]	Powell L., Fuchs D.,CirinoP. and Fletcher J. (2009).Effects of fact retrieval tutoring on third-grade students with math difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Sarah R. Learning Disabilities Research, 24(1), 1-11.
[39]	Verchaffel, Luwel, Torbeyns & Van Dooren, (2009). Conceptualizing, invenstigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXIV, (3), 335-359.
[40]	Malofeeva E., Day, J., Saco, X., Ciancio, D. and Young, L., (2004). Construction and Evaluation of a Number Sense Test With Head Start Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 648-659.
[41]	Rasanen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A.J., Aunio, P., and Dehaene, S., (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills, Cognitive Development, 24, 450-472.
[42]	Cowan, R., Donlan, C., Shepherd, D., Cole-Fletcher, R., Saxton, M., and Hurry J., (2011). Basic Calculation Proficiency and Mathematics Achievement in Elementary School Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 786-803.
[43]	Butterworth B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46 (1), 3-18.
[44]	Robinson C.S., Menchetti B.M. and Torgesen J.K. (2002). Toward a Two-Factor Theory of One Type of Mathematics Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 81-89.
[45]	Hopkins S. L. and Lawson M.J., (2006). The effect counting speed has on developing a reliance on retrieval in basic addition, Contemporary Educational Phychology, 31, 208-227.
[46]	Kammii, C., Lewis, B.A., and Kirkland, L.D., (2001). Fluency in subtraction compared with addition. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 33-42.
[47]	Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L.S., and Fuchs, D., (2010). Embedding Number-Combinations Practice Within Word-Problem Tutoring. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(1), 22-30.