Project-based Approach to Teaching Standardized Test Construction: A Model for Pre-Service Education Students on How to Standardize a Test

David M. Gordon^1, , James C. Collins¹ and Kelly L. Jewell¹

¹Special Education, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater, Whitewater, USA

Cite this paper:
David M. Gordon, James C. Collins and Kelly L. Jewell. Project-based Approach to Teaching Standardized Test Construction: A Model for Pre-Service Education Students on How to Standardize a Test. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(12):1528-1535. doi: 10.12691/education-3-12-8

Abstract

The article is a descriptive case study of a project-based approach to simulate test construction in a pre-service undergraduate training program for future teachers. The curriculum for pre-service teachers (PSTs) in the training program involved learning how to develop tests, how to practice using standardized assessment instruments, and to how to interpret the results from testing. The PSTs completed an educational project to acquire hands on teaching skills in relation to test construction and standardizing a test of a sample population. This article discusses the use of a project-based instructional approach by having students develop a standardized test, rather than using a traditional lecture-based approach, to teach basic assessment skills. Results revealed that PSTs learned the necessary foundational knowledge required in the curriculum and enjoyed the hands-on approach to learning. Practical implications and areas in need of future research are discussed.

Keywords:
test construction project-based learning pre-service teachers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Asim, A.E., Ekuri, E.E., and Eni, E.I. (2013). A diagnostic study of pre-service teachers’ competency in multiple-choice item development. Research in Education, 89, 13-22.
[2]	Brickell, H.M. (1976). Needed: Instruments as good as our eyes. Journal of Career Education 2(3), 56-66.
[3]	Blood, D.F., and Budd, W.C. (1972). Educational measurement and evaluation. New York: Harper & Row.
[4]	Brownell, M.T., Ross, D.R., Colón, E.P., and McCallum, C.L. (2003). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with exemplary practices in general teacher education. (COPSSE Document Number RS-4). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
[5]	Impara, J.C., Plake, B.S., and Fager, J.J. (1993). Teachers’ assessment background and attitudes toward testing. Theory into Practice 32(2), 113-117.
[6]	Kasparek, J., Malone, B., and Schock, E. (2004). Wisconsin history highlights: Delving into the past. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Historical Society Press.
[7]	Koetsier, C.P., & Wubbels, J.T. (1995). Bridging the gap between initial teacher training and teacher induction. Journal of DEducation for Teaching, 21(3), 333-345.
[8]	Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2013). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[9]	Mayo, S.T. (1967). Pre-service preparation of teachers in educational measurement. Final report (Project No. 5- 0807). Washington, D.C Office of Education (DHEW), Bureau of Research.
[10]	Mislevy, R.J. (2011). Evidence-centered design for simulation-based assessment CRESST Report 800. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
[11]	Murphy, K.R., and Davidshofer, C.O. (1991). Psychological Testing Principles and Applications (4th ed.), Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[12]	Nenty, H. J., Adedoyin, O. O., Odili, J. and Major, T. E. (2007). Primary teachers’ perception of classroom assessment practices as means of providing quality primary education by Botswana and Nigerian teachers.Educational Research and Reviews, 2 (4), 74-81.
[13]	Parker, D.C., McMaster, K.L. and Burns, M.K. (2011). Determining an instructional level for early writing skills. School Psychology Review 40 (1) 158-167.
[14]	Yu, H. (2008). Conceptualized technical writing assessment to better prepare students for workplace writing: Student-centered assessment instruments. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 88(3), 265-284.
[15]	Zenisky, A. L., and Hambleton, R. K. (2012). Developing test score reports that work: The process and best practices for effective communication. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice 31(2), 21-26.