American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2015, 3(10A), 17-25
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-10A-3
Open AccessResearch Article

Examining the Attitudes and Intention to Use Synchronous Distance Learning Technology among Pre-service Teachers: A Qualitative Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model

M.Tuncay Sarıtaş1, , Emel Yıldız2 and Hüseyin Can ŞENEL3

1Department of Instructional Technology, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey

2Mehmetçik Secondary School, Balikesir, Turkey

3Turkish Land Forces Non-Commissioned Officer College, Balikesir, Turkey

Pub. Date: October 24, 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Educational Technology, Communication and Learning)

Cite this paper:
M.Tuncay Sarıtaş, Emel Yıldız and Hüseyin Can ŞENEL. Examining the Attitudes and Intention to Use Synchronous Distance Learning Technology among Pre-service Teachers: A Qualitative Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(10A):17-25. doi: 10.12691/education-3-10A-3


“Synchronous” distance learning environments are becoming prevalent with the rapid developments in information and communication technologies allowing participants to be actively engaged in collaborative learning activities at a distance. Innovative synchronous distance learning tools provide alternative, flexible, and rich learning opportunities, which could highly be consistent with the demands and needs of the 21st century learners. It is therefore crucial for teachers of today to develop a positive attitude toward this kind of learning environment and have an intention to use it in their work life. This study aimed at examining the attitudes of pre-service teachers toward distance education and their acceptance status of the technology supporting synchronous distance learning experience. After a four-week distance course offered by four instructors from different universities at a distance, the findings indicate that the participants developed positive attitudes toward distance education. Based on the results, we discuss the pre-service teachers who accepted this technology based on three factors: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and intention to use it again.

synchronous online courses distance education pre-service teachers technology acceptance model

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,”MIS quarterly, 425-478, 2003.
[2]  Hrastinski, S. “Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning,” Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55, 2008.
[3]  Kearsley, G., Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000.
[4]  Cleveland-Innes, M., & Ally, M., “Affective learning outcomes in workplace training: A test of synchronous vs. asynchronous online learning environments,” Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 30(1), 2013.
[5]  Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I., “Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 251-262, 2001.
[6]  Celikkan, U., Senuzun, F., Sari, D., & Sahin, Y. G., “Interactive Videoconference Supported Teaching in Undergraduate Nursing: A Case Study for ECG,” Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 286-294, 2013.
[7]  Hsu, L. L., & Hsieh, S. I., “Factors affecting metacognition of undergraduate nursing students in a blended learning environment,” International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(3), 233-241, 2014.
[8]  Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L., “Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education,” Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-248, 2004.
[9]  Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C., “Faculty perspectives on moving from Blackboard to the Moodle learning management system,” TechTrends, 50(4), 36-45, 2006.
[10]  Britt, R., “Online education: a survey of faculty and students,” Radiologic technology, 77(3), 183-190, 2006.
[11]  Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K., “E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?,” The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135, 2011.
[12]  Cox, G., Carr, T., & Hall, M., “Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 183-193, 2004.
[13]  Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M., “Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583-591, 2011.
[14]  Motycka, C. A., Onge, E. L. S., & Williams, J. S., “Asynchronous versus synchronous learning in pharmacy education,” Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 2013.
[15]  Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T., “Dissertations at a Distance: Students’ Perceptions of Online Mentoring in a Doctoral Program,” International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 27(1), 2013.
[16]  Hewett, B. L., “Synchronous online conference-based instruction: A study of whiteboard interactions and student writing,” Computers and Composition, 23(1), 4-31, 2006.
[17]  Kohorst, K., & Cox, J. R., “Virtual office hours using a tablet PC: E‐lluminating biochemistry in an online environment,” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(3), 193-197, 2007.
[18]  AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K., “Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners' discourse functions,” Computers & Education, 62, 181-190, 2013.
[19]  Finkelstein, J., Learning in real time. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishing Company. CA., 2006.
[20]  Bower, M., “Synchronous collaboration competencies in web-conferencing environments–their impact on the learning process,” Distance Education, 32(1), 63-83., 2011.
[21]  Picciano, A. G., Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2001.
[22]  Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K., Building learning communities in cyberspace (Vol. 12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
[23]  Duemer, L., Fontenot, D., Gumfory, K., Kallus, M., Larsen, J., Schafer, S., & Shaw, B., “The use of online synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development,” The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12, 2002.
[24]  Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E., “Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implications,” The American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 88-103, 2009.
[25]  Allmendinger, K., “Social presence in synchronous virtual learning situations: The role of nonverbal signals displayed by avatars,” Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 41-56, 2010.
[26]  Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M., “Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences,” The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126, 2012.
[27]  Im, Y., & Lee, O., “Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 155-170, 2003.
[28]  Branon, R. F., & Essex, C., “Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education,” TechTrends, 45(1), 36-36, 2001.
[29]  Arbaugh, J. B., “An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and class participation in an Internet-based MBA course,” Management Learning, 31(4), 503-519, 2000.
[30]  Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S., “Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums,” Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253, 2003.
[31]  Wang, S. K., & Hsu, H. Y., “Use of the webinar tool (Elluminate) to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from student-trainers’ perspective,” Journal of Interactive Online learning, 7(3), 175-194, 2008.
[32]  Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.
[33]  Ojo, D. O., & Olakulehin, F. K., “Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 2006.
[34]  Clark, R. E., “Reconsidering research on learning from media,” Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459, 1983.
[35]  Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A., “Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1), 75-94, 1991.
[36]  Xenos, M., Pierrakeas, C., & Pintelas, P. A., “Survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the course of informatics of the Hellenic Open University,” Computers & Education, 39(4), 361-377, 2002.
[37]  Romiszowski, A. J., “How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation,” Educational Technology, 44 (1), 5-27, 2004.
[38]  Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D., “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies,” Management science, 46(2), 186-204, 2000.
[39]  Carswell, A. D., & Venkatesh, V., “Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance learning environment,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(5), 475-494, 2002.
[40]  Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P., “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, 40, 191–204, 2003.
[41]  Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A & Larsen, K.R.T., “The technology acceptance model: past, present and future,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12 (50), 752-780, 2003.
[42]  Davis, F. D., “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS quarterly, 319-340, 1989.
[43]  Park, S. Y., “An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-Learning,” Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 150–162, 2009.
[44]  Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z., “Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation,” Information & Management, 42, 1095–1104, 2005.
[45]  Saadé, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W., “Viability of the" technology acceptance model" in multimedia learning environments: a comparative study,” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 175-184, 2007.
[46]  Gibson, S. G., Harris, M. L., & Colaric, S. M., “Technology acceptance in an academic context: Faculty acceptance of online education,” Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 355-359, 2008.
[47]  Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Carabajal, K., “Evaluating online learning: Models and methods,” In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 1677-1684, 2000.
[48]  Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P., Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
[49]  Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C., Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage. 1998.
[50]  Creswell, J. W., Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage, 2012.
[51]  Ağır, F., Gür, H., & Okçu, A., “Özel okullarda ve devlet okullarında çalışan ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı tutumlarının belirlenmesi,” In The 8th International Educational Technology Conference, pp. 370-375, 2008.
[52]  Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G., Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.
[53]  Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B., Designing qualitative research. Sage, 2010.
[54]  Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H., Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2006.
[55]  Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. J., “Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners’ perspectives in a blended graduate course,” Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 245-264, 2007.
[56]  Johnson, G., “The relative learning benefits of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 166-169, 2008.
[57]  Annetta, L., Murray, M., Gull Laird, S., Bohr, S., & Park, J., “Investigating student attitudes toward a synchronous, online graduate course in a multi-user virtual learning environment,” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,16(1), 5-34, 2008.
[58]  Beyth-Marom, R., Saporta, K., & Caspi, A., “Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials: Factors affecting students’ preferences and choices,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 245-262, 2005.
[59]  Akarasriworn, C., & Ku, H. Y., “Graduate Students' Knowledge Construction and Attitudes Toward Online Synchronous Videoconferencıng Collaborative Learning Environments,” Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(1), 2013.
[60]  Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M. & Huang, B., “How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature,” Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439, 2004.
[61]  Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H., “Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium,” Computers & Education, 58(3), 953-963, 2012.
[62]  McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P., “Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-17, 2009.
[63]  Chao, K. J., Hung, I. C., & Chen, N. S., “On the design of online synchronous assessments in a synchronous cyber classroom,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 379-395, 2012.
[64]  Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E., & Kuo, Y. T., “A case study of integrating Interwise: Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 164-181, 2014.
[65]  Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J., “Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses,” Computers & Education, 60(1), 87-94, 2013.
[66]  Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A., “Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance,” Computers & Education, 52(3), 599-607, 2009.
[67]  Marjanovic, O., “Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(2), 129-138, 1999.
[68]  Hart, C., “Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature,” Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19-42, 2012.
[69]  Harrell, I. L., & Bower, B. L., “Student characteristics that predict persistence in community college online courses,” American Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 178-191. 2011.
[70]  Musingafi, M. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S., “Challenges for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of the Zimbabwe Open University” Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66, 2015.
[71]  Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1984). Are validity and reliability "relevant" in qualitative evaluation research? Evaluation & the Health Professions, 7, 413-426.