American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2015, 3(8), 964-967
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-8-3
Open AccessArticle

Learning Approach of Problem Solving for Increase Learning Achievement of the Civil Engineering Evaluation Program

Riyan Arthur1,

1Civil Engineering, State University Of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Pub. Date: July 05, 2015

Cite this paper:
Riyan Arthur. Learning Approach of Problem Solving for Increase Learning Achievement of the Civil Engineering Evaluation Program. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(8):964-967. doi: 10.12691/education-3-8-3


Objective of This study aims to obtain empirical data on the application of problem solving to improve learning achievement of the subject civil engineering evaluation program. The method used in this research is a classroom action research method is performed in two cycles, each cycle consisting of four phases: 1) planning, 2) action 3). Observation and 4) reflection. The sample was 40 students of educational civil engineering, in State University of Jakarta, conducted by two cycles used to measure cognitive assessment test results and observation for affective domain. The terms of the plan to prepare teacher learning, quiz, student worksheets, observation sheet. Results collaborators response data, the activity of students, in Cycle I 56.72; Cycle II 79.56. At each cycle was carried out as a form of reflection and triangulation of data verification on each cycle. Based on the results, it can be concluded that with the implementation of problem solving approach, was able to improve learning achievement of students in the subject of civil engineering evaluation program.

classroom action research problem solving civil engineering evaluation program

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Cohen, E.G. Designing Groupwork: Strtegies for the Heterogeneus Classroom. New York: Teaching College Press, 1994
[2]  Gardner, H. The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How school Should Teach. New York :Basicbook , 1991.
[3]  Kadir. 2004. Efektivitas Strategi Peta Konsep Dalam Pembelajaran Sains-Matematika (Meta-Analisis Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, No. 051 Tahun X November 2004.
[4]  Karpov, YV danBrandsford, JD .Vygotsky and the Doctrine of Emperical and Theoritical Learning , Educational Psichologist, 1995.
[5]  Kozulin A danPresseisen .Bz.Mediated Learning Experience and Psychologist tools.
[6]  McGivney, J.M & DeFanco, T.C.1995. Geometry Proof Writing: A Problem Solving Approach a’la Polya, The Mathematics Teacher Journal: Vol. 88, 1995.
[7]  NTCM, 1980. An Agenda for Action: Recommendation for School Mathematics. Reston Virgnia.
[8]  Polya, G. 1981. Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving. New York: Jhon Willey Inc.
[9]  Sabandar, Josua. 2010. “Thinking Classroom” Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah. Bandung: UPI Bandung.
[10]  Sanjaya, Wina. StrategiPembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
[11]  Sharan,Y. Expanding Cooperative Learning Trough Group Investigation. New York: Teacher College Press, 1992.
[12]  Slavin, R. E. 1984. Meta-Analysis in Educational. How has it been Used. Educational Research. Vol. 13 (18). pp 319-352.
[13]  Suydam, M.N. 1980. Untangling Clues From Research on Problem Solving. In S Krulik and R. E. Reys (Eds). Yearbook. Problem Solving in School Mathematics. Virginia: NCTM.