American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2015, 3(2), 225-242
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-2-17
Open AccessArticle

Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanisms among the Kembata Society

Abebe Demewoz Mengesha1, , Samson Seid Yesuf2 and Tessema Gebre3

1Anthropology, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

2Institute of Indigenous Studies, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

3English, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

Pub. Date: February 11, 2015

Cite this paper:
Abebe Demewoz Mengesha, Samson Seid Yesuf and Tessema Gebre. Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanisms among the Kembata Society. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(2):225-242. doi: 10.12691/education-3-2-17

Abstract

The major goal of this study was to assess the role of indigenous institutions in handling/ settling conflicts in the Kembata people in Kembata–Tembaro Zone in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Regional State (SNNPRS).The research was conducted in Kedida Gamelo woreda and it was purposively selected. This selection was based on the following reasons. The first reason was that, it is the seat of the zonal administration, so it would be easy to consult the zonal culture and tourism department frequently. On the other hand, since it is the zone’s centre, it is thought to be relatively better secured than other woredas. Similarly, as casual visit of the research team to the study area indicate that resourceful informants can easily be found in the selected woreda. Kedida Gamella woreda has 17 rural kebeles. Bezenabenara, one of them is selected as the setting of the study because it is believed that the kebele is easily accessible from Durame town, which is the seat of the zonal administration. To achieve this goal, an attempt was made to collect the data in the study area by using different mechanisms. Qualitative research methodology was employed in the study for its appropriateness to assess the role of indigenous institutions in handling/ settling conflicts in the study area and data was collected through the use of interview, key informant interview, focus group discussion, personal observation and document review. In terms of sample size, the researchers have done interviews with 10 key informants, i.e. eight (8) key informants was with elders and two(2) key informants from court officials (judges) and three(3) FGDs were conducted from different target groups such as elders, youth and local authorities. Each FGD has eight (8) discussants classified based on sex. The results obtained from the study suggest that Conflicts in Kambata, as in anywhere else, may vary from trivial interpersonal disagreements to a serious dispute which might eventually lead to homicide. The most common conflict issues in Kambata are grazing land, water, farmland and borderland. There are many deeds and accounts in the daily activities of the society which are considered to be crimes vis-à-vis the norms and traditions of the Kembata community. However, the most serious ones are: beating a man with a slump and/or thin stick, Beating elderly, raping, murder, Physical damage, Adultery. There are different traditional institutions to solve the conflicts among Kembata societies. These are Reeda, Gudagambela tradition. The local communities prefer customary laws than courts due to the following reasons: First customary laws are flexible; they develop as the communities go forward and provide communities with a sense of ownership contrast to formal legal systems that are perceived as alien to a considerable number of people in developing countries in general and Ethiopia in particular. Secondary, customary law provides a fundamental and central role to maintain order in many communities. This owing to the fact that it is developed and maintained by local peoples as a result of which are suits local circumstances. In fact, the extent of the role of customary laws in maintaining order varies from community to community depending on many factors. In addition it plays an important cultural role in the lives of many people and beliefs. Thirdly, the law itself is more immediate and meaningful to all people concerned; as it is developed and imposed by the community itself that is by their own community major role in that process, yet having the appropriate limitations that should be imposed on the recognition of customary laws. Therefore, to sum up, the local systems of conflict resolution among the Kembata are the most preferable one even though the local community have already begun to use government courts as an opinion.

Keywords:
indigenous kembata society conflict

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Augsburger, David W.1992.Conflict Mediation across cultures: Pathways and Patterns. London: Westminster John Knox press.
 
[2]  Awel Ebrahim. 2005. “Traditional Means of conflict Resolution Jaarsaa among the Oromo, the case of Disho.” B.A Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
 
[3]  Ayalew gebre. 2001. “Conflict Management, resolution and institutions among the Karayu and their Neighbours,” In Mohamed Salih, ton Dietz and Abdel Ghaffar Mohamed Ahmed (eds) African pastoralist: Conflict, Institutions and Government.
 
[4]  Bohannan. P. 1967. Law and warfare: Studies in the Anthropology of conflict. Austin: University of Texas press.
 
[5]  Coser, Lewis A. 1968. “Conflict, Social Aspect” In international Encyclopedia of the Social Science. V.3. the Macmilian Company and Free press.
 
[6]  Dejene Aredo and Abdurahman Ame. 2005. Indigenous resolution in pastoral Areas of Ethiopia: The case of the well council and Arara of Borena. Research report, Organization for social Science research in Eastern and southern Africa. Addis Ababa.
 
[7]  Demissie Gudisa. 2005. “Social Networks, Conflict and indigenous conflict Resolution Mechanisms among the Derba Oromo of Noth Shewa.” M.A. thesis, Addis Ababa University.
 
[8]  Dunn, T. 1975. Foundations of Peace and Freedom. Swansea: Davies press.
 
[9]  Eskedar girum. 2008. “Traditional Conflict Management Institutions among the Aleltu Oromo community of Northern Shewa, Ethiopia.” M.A. thesis, Addis Ababa University.
 
[10]  Gemetchu Megerssa. 1993. “Identity, Knowledge system and the colonizing structure.” Ph.D. thesis; School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
 
[11]  Girma Gelaye. 1980.”Liability for wrongs under the Kottu-Oromo Customary Law.” LLB. Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
 
[12]  Gulliver, P.H. 1979. Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross cultural Perspective. London: Academic press.
 
[13]  Kestner, Prudence B.and ray, Larry. 2002. The Conflict resolution Training program. SanFrancisco: Jossey Bass.
 
[14]  Kit chin, R. & Tate, J.N. (2000). Conducting Research into Human Geography; Theory, Methodology and practice, Pearson Education Limited, England
 
[15]  Mamo Hebo. 2006. Land, Local custom and State policies: Land Tenure, Land Disputes and Disputes settlement among the Arsii Oromo of southern Ethiopia. Kyofo shoukadan book Sellers.
 
[16]  Melaku. Abera. 2009. “Land disputes and dispute Settlement Mechanisms among the Tulama Oromo of Suluta district” MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.
 
[17]  Miall. H. and et al. 1999. Contemporary Conflict Resolution: the prevention. Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts. Polity press
 
[18]  Mikkelesen, B. (2005). Methods for Development Work and Research: A new Guide for participation, 2nded, sage publication, New Delhi.
 
[19]  Nader, Laura. 1968. “Conflict: Anthropological Aspect.” In International encyclopedia of the social Science: vol.3, pp.230-241. New York: Macmillan Company and Free press.
 
[20]  Otterbein. Keith F. 1994. Feuding and Warfare: Selected Works of Keith F. Ot Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
 
[21]  Roberehek. Clayton. 1990. “Motivation and Material Causes: an Explanation on conflict and War” in Jonathan Haas (ed.) the anthropology of war. New York: Cambridge University press.
 
[22]  Singer, Linda R. 1990. Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System. London: West view press.
 
[23]  Taddesse Berisso. 1988. “Traditional Warfare among the Guji of Southern Ethiopia.” M.A. Thesis, Michigan State University.
 
[24]  2008. The role of Elders in conflict resolution: The Case of Arsi Oromo with special Reference to Dodolla district and its Environments: In Tarekegn Adebo & Hannah Tsadik (eds.) Making Peace in Ethiopia: Five Cases of Traditional Mechanisms for Conflict Resolution. Addis Ababa: Peace and Development Committee.PP.48-77.