American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(11A), 8-15
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-11A-2
Open AccessResearch Article

Learner Attitude towards Chemistry, Study Skills and Examination Preparedness: A Case of a Public School in Eastern, Kenya

Winnie Muthoni Ngila1 and Lazarus Ndiku Makewa1,

1University of Eastern Africa, Baraton

Pub. Date: December 08, 2014

Cite this paper:
Winnie Muthoni Ngila and Lazarus Ndiku Makewa. Learner Attitude towards Chemistry, Study Skills and Examination Preparedness: A Case of a Public School in Eastern, Kenya. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(11A):8-15. doi: 10.12691/education-2-11A-2


This study intended to test if there was significant difference in chemistry preparedness in terms of attitude towards chemistry, study skills and exam preparedness between boys and girls, between boarders and day scholars and between low and high achievers. Two hundred and eleven (211) subjects participated. A questionnaire was designed to measure preparedness in chemistry in relation to attitude towards chemistry, study skills, and exam preparedness. To address the hypotheses, frequency distributions and other descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations and percentages were used. Independent sample t-tests were performed to address the first and the second hypotheses to determine whether differences between variables existed. The results indicate that there is homogeneity of variance amongst attitude towards chemistry, study skills and exam preparedness. The findings also inform that preparedness in chemistry in terms of attitude towards chemistry, study skills, and exam preparedness is the same in both boys and girls but boys lagged slightly below girls in attitude towards chemistry. There was no significant difference in chemistry preparedness between genders in relation to these variables. Borders and day scholars have similar preparedness in chemistry in terms of attitude, study skills and exam preparedness. The results further show that day scholars have a slightly higher preparedness in chemistry than the boarders. Higher achievers have more positive attitude towards chemistry, better study skills and higher exam preparedness.

learner attitude chemistry study skills examination preparedness

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Aiken, L. R., & Aiken, D. R. (1969). Recent research on attitudes concerning science. Science Education, 53, 295-305.
[2]  Andreassen, R. & Braten, I. (2011). Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 520-537.
[3]  Al-Hilawani, Y.A.and Sartawi, A. A. (1997), “Study Skills and Habits of Female University Students,” College Student Journal, 31, 537-544.
[4]  Allgood, W.P., Risko, V.J., Alvarez, M.C. and Fairbanks, M.M. (2000), “Factors that Influence Study,” In R.F. Flippo and D.C. Caverly (Eds.).Handbook of College Reading and Study Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[5]  Aydeniz, M. & Kaya, E. (2012). Factors impacting Turkish students’ attitudes towards science and their academic performance in science. Turkish Science Education, 9 (2), 25-48.
[6]  Azubuike, O.C. (2011). Influential Factors Affecting the Attitude of Students Towards Vocational/Technical Subjects in Secondary Schools South Eastern Nigeria. Educational and Social Research, 1 (1), 49-56.
[7]  Boekaerts, M. & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2), 199-231.
[8]  Butler, R. (1998). Determinants of help seeking: Relations between perceived reasons for classroom help-avoidance and help-seeking behaviors in an experimental context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 630-643.
[9]  Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
[10]  Can, H.B. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards school chemistry: the effect of interaction between gender and grade level. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13 (1), 1-16.
[11]  Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
[12]  Cheung, D. (2007). Students’ attitude towards chemistry lessons: the interactive effect between grade level and gender. Res Sci Educ 2009 (39), 75-79.
[13]  Cheung, D. (2009). Developing a scale to measure students’attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (16), 2185-2203.
[14]  Clarebout, G., Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2010). The relations between self-regulation and the embedding of support in learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58 (5), 573-587.
[15]  Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537-550.
[16]  Corno, L. (1993). The Best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
[17]  De Bruin, A.B., Thiede, K.W., & Camp, G. (2001). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109 (3), 294-310.
[18]  De Corte, E., Mason, L., Depaepe, F., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Self-regulation of mathematical knowledge and skills. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 155-172). New York: Routledge.
[19]  Dignath, C. & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264.
[20]  Di Vesta,F.J. and Moreno, V. (1993), “Cognitive Control Functions of Study Activities: A Compensation Model,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18 (1), 47-65.
[21]  Elliot, L., Foster, S. and Stinson, M. (2002), “Student Study Habits using Notes from Speech-to-Text Support Service.” Council of Exceptional Children, 69 (1), 25-40.
[22]  Francis, L. J. & Greer, J. E. (1999). Measuring attitude toward science among secondary school students: The affective domain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17 (2), 219-226.
[23]  Glasman, L. R. & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (5), 778-822.
[24]  Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2004). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241.
[25]  Harnishferger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, research. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 176-206). San Diego: Academic Press.
[26]  Hofstein, A. & Naaman, R.M. (2011). High school students’ attitude toward and interest in learning chemistry. Educación química, 22 (2), 90-102.
[27]  Hofstein, A., Ben-zvi, R., Samuel, D., & Tamir, P. (1977). Attitudes of Israeli high-school students toward chemistry and physics: A comparative study. Science Education, 61 (2), 259-268.
[28]  Hoover, J.J. (1989), “Study skills,” In E.A. Polloway. J.R. Patton, J.S. Payne, and R.A. Payne. Strategies for Teaching Learners with Special Needs (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
[29]  Inzahuli, S.M., Role, E. & Makewa, L. N. (2012). Gender Disparities in Self-concept, Attitude and Perception in Physics and Chemistry. Atlas Journal of Science Education 2 (1): 61-69 2012.
[30]  Jones, C.H., Slate, J.R. and Kyle, A. (1992), “Study Skills of Teacher Education Students,” Teacher Education, 28 (1), 7-15.
[31]  Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (7), 871-893.
[32]  King, A. (1992), “Comparison of Self-Questioning, Summarizing, and Note Taking Review as Strategies for Learning from Lectures,” American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323
[33]  Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72, 115-126.
[34]  Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (3), 222-232.
[35]  Kolovelonis, A., Goudas, M., & Dermitzaki, I. (2011). The effect of different goals and self-recording on self-regulation of learning a motor skill in a physical education setting. Learning and Instruction, 21 (3), 355-364.
[36]  Kuhl, J. (1998) Volitional mediators of cognition–behavior consistency: self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckman (eds) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 101-128). New York: Springer.
[37]  Labuhn, A.S., Zimmerman, B.J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards Metacognition and Learning, 5 (2), 173-194.
[38]  Nyamba, S.Y. & Mwajombe, K.K. (2012). Students’ preferences on science subject: does this affect their performance?: a case study of Udzungwa Secondary School, Kilolo, Iringo, Tanzania. International Journal of Science and Technology, 20(8), 556-560.
[39]  Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.
[40]  Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (9), 1049-1079.
[41]  Paris, S. G. and Winograd, P. (2001), “The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching: Principles and Practices for Teacher Preparation,” U.S. Department of Education Project Preparing Teachers to Use Contextual Teaching and Learning Strategies To Improve Student Success In and Beyond School, (accessed August 17, 2014), available at
[42]  Quinn, G. P. & Keogh M. J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[43]  Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13, 93-114.
[44]  Satta, K. & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitude towards chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88 (1), 525-547.
[45]  Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26-59.
[46]  Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23 (1), 7-25.
[47]  Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371.
[48]  Shrigley, R. L. (1990). Attitude and behavior are correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 97-113.
[49]  Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18.
[50]  Souvignier, E. & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
[51]  Spall, K., Dickson, D., & Boyes, E. (2004). Development of school students’ constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (7), 787-803.
[52]  Stanley, B., Slate, J.R. and Jones, C.H. (1999), “Study behaviors of college preparatory and honors students in the ninth grade,” The High School Journal, 82 (3), 165-171.
[53]  Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2011). Self-regulatory training through elementary-school students’ homework completion. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 87-101). New York: Routledge.
[54]  Tonks, S. M., & Taboada, A. (2011). Developing self-regulated readers through instruction for reading engagement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 173-186). New York: Routledge.
[55]  VanMeter, P., Yokoi, L. and Pressley, M. (1994), “College Students’ Theory of Note-Taking Derived from Their Perceptions of Note-Taking,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
[56]  Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387-398.
[57]  Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-188.
[58]  Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998) Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker & J. Dunlosky (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, The educational psychology series. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[59]  Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205.
[60]  Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
[61]  Wood, E., Willoughby, T., McDermott, C., Motz, M., Kaspar, V. and Ducharme, M.J. (1999), “Developmental differences in study behavior,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 527-536.
[62]  Yager, R. E., & Yager, S. O. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (4), 347-358.
[63]  Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1994). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.
[64]  Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revised (pp. 139-164). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age.