American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(11), 1005-1014
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-11-2
Open AccessArticle

Teacher-Student Attachment and Student School Adaptation: A Variable Centered and Person Centered Analytical Approaches

David Granot1,

1Department of special education, Oranim-Academic College of Education, Tivon, Israel

Pub. Date: November 02, 2014

Cite this paper:
David Granot. Teacher-Student Attachment and Student School Adaptation: A Variable Centered and Person Centered Analytical Approaches. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(11):1005-1014. doi: 10.12691/education-2-11-2

Abstract

The present study followed the attachment perspective for assessing the contribution of teacher-student relationships to the explanation of student school adaptation. The study sample included 100 pairs comprised of Israeli homeroom teachers and their school-aged students (mean age=10.7 years). Participating teachers and students reported on their perceptions about their reciprocal relationships on dimensions used for the evaluation of parent-child attachment relationships, such as availability, acceptance, closeness, rejection, conflict, and dependence. Additionally, 56 of the children's subject-matter teachers reported on the children's school adaptation. Person-centered cluster analysis identified two teacher-student ad hoc attachment-like relationship groups: secure (n=72), characterized by high levels of acceptance and closeness, and by low levels of rejection, conflict, and dependency; and insecure (n=28), characterized by high levels of rejection, conflict, and dependence, and by low levels of acceptance and closeness. After controlling for children's socio-demographic indicators (gender, age, class size, and family socioeconomic status), analysis revealed that children in the secure teacher-student attachment-like group showed lower levels of behavior problems (externalizing, internalizing), difficulties in learning self-regulation, higher levels of frustration tolerance, task orientation, popularity among peers, and better academic achievement than did the children in the insecure teacher-student attachment-like group. Implications for educational counseling intervention for teachers and for research are discussed.

Keywords:
teacher-student attachment-like relationships school adaptation socio-economic indicators

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Al-Yagon, M., & Mikulincer, M., “Socio-emotional and academic adjustment among children with learning disorders: the meditational role of attachment-based factors’” , Journal of Special Education, 38 (2), 111-123. 2004.
 
[2]  Al-Yagon, M., & Mikulincer, M., “Children's appraisal of teacher as a secure base and their socio-emotional and academic adjustment in middle childhood”. Research in Education, 75, 1-18. 2006.
 
[3]  Bergin C., & Bergin D., “Attachment in the classroom”, Educational psychology review, 21, 141-170. 2009.
 
[4]  Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W., “The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment”. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61-80. 1997.
 
[5]  Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W., “Children's interpersonal behaviors and the teacher-child relationship”. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934-946. 1998.
 
[6]  Bridget, K. H., & Pianta, R., “Can instructional and emotional support in first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?” Child Development, 76 (5), 949-967. 2005.
 
[7]  Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A,, “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis”. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-317. (1985).
 
[8]  Davis, H,. “A Conceptualizing the Role and Influence of Student-Teacher Relationships on Children's Social and Cognitive Development”. Educational Psychologist, 38 (4), 207-234, 2003.
 
[9]  Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C., Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ; Prentice Hall. 1998.
 
[10]  Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C. A., “The teacher-child rating scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies”. School Psychology Review, 15, 393-409. 1986.
 
[11]  Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C, C., “Children's relationships with peers: Differential association with aspects of the teacher-child relationships”. Child Development, 65, 253-263. 1994.
 
[12]  Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Philipsen, L C., “Stability and continuity of child-caregiver and child-peer relationships”. Child Development, 6, 418-426. 1998.
 
[13]  Hughes, J., N., “Teacher-student relationships and school adjustment: progress and remaining challenges”. Attachment & Human Development, Vol. 14, No. 3, 319-327. 2012.
 
[14]  Hughes, J., N., Cavell, T., A., & Jackson, T., “Influence of the teacher-student relationships on childhood conduct problems: A prospective study”. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, No, 2, 173-184. 1999.
 
[15]  Hughes, J., N., Gleason, K. A., & Zhang, D., “Relationship influence on teachers' perceptions of academic competence in academically at-risk minority and majority first grade classrooms”. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 303-320. 2005.
 
[16]  Israeli Ministry of Education general manager Policy Circular, “The homeroom teacher”. Hozer Mankal Ministry of education general manager policy circular No 6 -October, (in Hebrew), http://www.eduocation.org.il./Mankal, (pp 10-14). 1994.
 
[17]  Kerns, K. A., Attachment in middle childhood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications New York: Guilford, 2008, 366-382.
 
[18]  Komproe, I. H., Rijken, M., Wynarnd, J. R., Jacques, A M. W., & Harm't, H., “Available support and received support: Different effects under stressful circumstance”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 59-77. 1997.
 
[19]  Lakey, B., & Cohen, S., Social support theory and measurement. In. S. Cohen & L. Underwood (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 29-52.
 
[20]  Magnusson, D., Individual development: A holistic, integrated approach. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context, New York: American Psychological Association, 1995, 19-60.
 
[21]  Mayseless, O., Ontogeny of attachment in middle childhood: Conceptualization of normative changes. In K. A. Kerns & R. A. Richardson (Eds.), Attachment in Middle Childhood, London: Guilford, 2005, 1-23.
 
[22]  McClelland, D. C., “Testing for competence rather than for intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14. 1973.
 
[23]  Merrit, E., G., Wanless, S., B., Rimm-Kaufman, S., E. Cameron, C. & Peugh, J., L., “The Contribution of teachers' social behaviors and self-regulatory skills in first grade”, School Psychology Review, 2012, 41, No. 2, 141-159.
 
[24]  Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M., Understanding cluster-analysis. In E. Mooi & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), A Concise Guide to Market Research. The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics, Heidelberg Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, 259-283.
 
[25]  Murdock, T., B. & Miller, A., “Teachers as source of middle school students' motivational identity: Variable-centered and person centered analytic approaches”. The Elementary School Journal, 103 (4), 383-430. 2003.
 
[26]  Murray, C., & Murray, K. M., “Child level correlates of teacher-student relationships: An examination of demographic characteristics, academic orientations and behavioral orientations”. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 751-762. 2004.
 
[27]  Murray, C., & Murray, K. M., & Waas, G, A., “Child and teacher reports of teacher-student relationships: Concordance of perspectives and associations with school adjustment in urban kindergarten classrooms”. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29 (1), 49-61. 2008.
 
[28]  Murray, C., & Pianta, R. C., “The importance of teacher-child relationships for adolescents with high incidence disabilities”. Theory into Practice, 46, 105-112. 2007.
 
[29]  O'Connor, E. E., Collins, B. A. & Supplee, L., “Behavior problems in late childhood: the roles of early maternal attachment and teacher-child relationships trajectories”. Attachment & Human Development. Vol. 14, No. 3, 265-288. 2012.
 
[30]  Pianta, R. C., “Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers”. Journal of school psychology, 32, 15-31. 1994.
 
[31]  Pianta, R.C., Supporting teachers: The key to affecting child-teacher relationships. In R.C. Pianta (Ed.), Enhancing Relationships Between children and Teachers, American Psychological Association. Washington, DC, 1999, 125-168.
 
[32]  Pianta, R. C., Classroom Management and Relationships Between Children and Teachers: Implications for Research and Practice. In N. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006, 149-162.
 
[33]  Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. S., “Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school”. New Directions for Child Development, 57, 61-80, 1992.
 
[34]  Rose-Krasnor, L., “The nature of social competence: A theoretical Review”. Social Development, 6, 11-135. 1997.
 
[35]  Saft, E. W., & Pianta, R. C., “Teachers' perceptions of their relationships with students: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children”. Scholl Psychology Quarterly, 16, 125-141. 2001.
 
[36]  Salomon, G. & Mayseless, O., Dialectic contradictions in the experiences of Israeli Jewish adolescents: Efficacy and stress, closeness and friction, and conformity and non-compliance. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan, (Eds.) Adolescence and Education, Volume III: International perspectives on adolescence, Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2003, 149-171.
 
[37]  Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R. & Pierce, G. R., “Social support: The search for theory”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 133-147. 1990.
 
[38]  Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J., “Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and teacher-child relationships during the school transition”. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 39-60. 2005.
 
[39]  Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Thijs, J. T. & Van der Leij, A., “Supporting teachers' relationships with disruptive children: the potential of relationships-focused reflection”. Attachment & Human Development, Vol. 14, No. 3, 305-318, 2012.
 
[40]  Yair, G., “The deprivation index: Paradoxes and empirical assessment, policy implications”. Megamot, 34, 5-26, 1991 (in Hebrew).
 
[41]  Verschueren, K. & Koomen, H. M.Y., “Teacher-child relationships from an attachment perspective”. Attachment and Human Development, Vol. 14, No. 3, 205-211. 2012.
 
[42]  Zionts, L.T., Examining relationships between students and teachers: A potential extension of attachment theory? In K. A. Kerns & R. A. Richardson (Eds.), Attachment in Middle Childhood, London: Guilford, 2005, 231-254.