American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(10), 932-941
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-10-13
Open AccessArticle

Home, School and Gender Differences in Early Reading Fluency among Standard Three Pupils in Primary Schools in Kiuu Sublocation, Kiambu County, Kenya

Tabitha Wang’eri1, and Doyne Mugambi1

1Department of Educational Psychology, P. O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi-Kenya

Pub. Date: October 21, 2014

Cite this paper:
Tabitha Wang’eri and Doyne Mugambi. Home, School and Gender Differences in Early Reading Fluency among Standard Three Pupils in Primary Schools in Kiuu Sublocation, Kiambu County, Kenya. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(10):932-941. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-13


The intention of the study was to establish the relationship between home and school factors and reading fluency in Kiswahili and English languages among standard three pupils in Kiuu sub location, Kiambu County, Kenya. To achieve this, the study investigated family factors such as family size, number of children attending school, languages spoken at home, parental support such as helping with homework and the frequency of reading story books for children. The study also sought to establish school factors that support reading fluency such as languages of instruction teachers used as well as the number of Kiswahili and English text books children possessed. Bronfennbrener (1979) ecological systems theory was used to ground the study. The study sample consisted of four purposefully selected primary schools two of which were public and the other two privately owned. Data regarding the school and home factors were collected through a paper based questionnaire while the data relating to pupils’ Kiswahili and English reading fluency was collected through one-minute reading passages one in Kiswahili and the other in English. The results revealed that majority of the children lived with both parents and had between 1 and 3 siblings in school and the languages spoken at home, school and among the peers were mother tongue, Kiswahili and English. For majority of the children homework was overseen by the mother while many of them could not recall the last time a parent read to them a story book. With regard to accessing books for reading, the findings revealed that children in private schools had more access to English and Kiswahili books than their counterparts in public schools. With regard to reading fluency, the study established that the maximum number of English words read per minute were 171 while the least were 0 with a mode of 69. The maximum number of Kiswahili words read was 118 with a minimum of 0 and a mode of 61. Children in Private schools displayed better fluent reading than their counterparts in public schools and girls were more fluent readers than boys. The study recommended that the literary environments be improved both at home and in the schools and that the language policy be further interrogated given that the language children are exposed to at home is different from the language of instruction at school and also different from the language used among peers. Another recommendation of this study was that curriculum developers engage in material development both in Kiswahili and the various local languages in tandem with policy requirements. The study further recommended that methods of improving reading acquisition and fluency be sought.

reading fluency public primary school private primary school gender differences

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Kuhn, M. & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95. (1), 3-21.
[2]  Abadzi, H. (2006). Efficient Learning for the Poor: Insights from the Frontier of Cognitive. Neuroscience. Washington: The World Bank.
[3]  Fielding, L., Kerr, N., & Rosier, P. (2007). Annual Growth for all students, Catch-Up Growth for those who are behind. Kennewick, WA: The New Foundation Press, Inc
[4]  Jeynes, W.H. (2010). Parental Involvement and Encouraging That Involvement: Implications for School-Based Programs. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 747-774.
[5]  Min, X., Kushner, S. B., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Steiner, R. (2010). The relationship between parental involvement, self-regulated learning, and reading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS-K database. Social Psychology of Education, 13(2), 237-269.
[6]  Fan, W., & Williams, C. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53-74.
[7]  Tan, E. T., & Goldberg, W. A. (2009). Parental school involvement in relation to children's grades and adaptation to school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 442-453.
[8]  Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J., Thomas, E., & Daley, K. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Re-search Quarterly, 32, 96-116.
[9]  Senechal, M. & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of child’s reading skill: A five Year Longitudinal Study. Child development, March/April 2002, volume 73, Number 2, page445-460.
[10]  Samuels, S. J. (2006). Towards a model of reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp.24-46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
[11]  Kosonen, K. (2005). Education in local languages: Policy and practice in Southeast Asia. First languages first: Community-based literacy programmes for minority language contexts in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO, Bangkok.
[12]  UNESCO. 2010. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2010: Reaching the Marginalized; Regional Overview, Sub-Saharan Africa. Paris: UNESCO.
[13]  Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[14]  Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, Hi: Pacific Resources for Education and learning.
[15]  Gacheche, K. (2010). Challenges in implementing a mother tongue based language-in-education policy: Policy and Practice in Kenya. POLIS Journal Vol. 4 pp 1-45
[16]  Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (Eds.). (2006). The Handbook of Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[17]  Modirkhamene, S. (2011). EFL learners’ additional language proficiency and academic achievement: Possible effects of bilinguality. Germany: Lambert Publications (LAP).
[18]  Wrigglesworth, G. & Simpson, J. (2008). The language learning environment of pre-school children in indigenous communities. In: S. May, ed. Critical Multiculturalism: Rethinking Multicultural and Anti-racialist Education. London: Farmer Press, pp.13-29.
[19]  Cunningham, P. (2005). “If they don’t read much, how they ever gonna get good?” The reading teacher, 59, (1), 88-90.
[20]  August, Diane, and Timothy Shanahan, eds. (2006). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language, Minority Children, and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[21]  Chomsky, C. (1978). When you still can’t read in the third grade: After decoding what? In S. J. Samuels (Ed.), what research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 13-30). Newark, DE: international reading association
[22]  Palumbo, T. J., & Willcutt, J. R. (2006). Perspectives on fluency: English- language learners and students with dyslexia. In S. J. Samuels (Ed.), what research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 159-178). Newark, DE: international reading association.