American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(10), 883-891
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-10-6
Open AccessArticle

The Assessment Process of Pupils’ Learning in Saudi Education System: A Literature Review

Yahya Al Alhareth1, and Ibtisam Al Dighrir2

1Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

2General Administration of Education in Najran region, Ministry of Education, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Pub. Date: October 08, 2014

Cite this paper:
Yahya Al Alhareth and Ibtisam Al Dighrir. The Assessment Process of Pupils’ Learning in Saudi Education System: A Literature Review. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(10):883-891. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-6

Abstract

Assessments are essential components of teaching and learning programmes and help shape individual learning. Assessment at secondary and higher education levels in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) uses an examination system and it relies solely on the teacher to assess students. The assessment does not assess the ability of students to design and carry out experiments or even evaluate their understanding of mathematical and scientific concepts. Thereby, this paper will review the literature of the assessment process in the Saudi General Education System by considering several different aspects. This consideration will include the definitions and purpose of assessment as a means of learning about students and the progression of their learning. The different forms of assessment will also be considered as well the assessment practices in mathematics, and in particular in intermediate schools in Saudi Arabia as it can provide insights into the quality of assessment practices.

Keywords:
summative assessment formative assessment assessment process mathematics assessment

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Abir, A., (1993), Saudi Arabia: Government, Society, and the Gulf Crisis, New York: Routledge.
 
[2]  Al Kadri, H. M., Al‐Moamary, M. S., Magzoub, M. E., Roberts, C. and van der Vleuten, C. P. M., (2011), Students’ Perceptions Of The Impact Of Assessment On Approaches To Learning: A Comparison Between Two Medical Schools With Similar Curricula, International Journal of Medical Education, 2: pp. 44-52.
 
[3]  Al-Hakel, S., (2007), School Administration and its Manpower in Saudi Arabia (Riyadh, Saudi.
 
[4]  Alhammad, T. M., (2010), The Education Dilemma in Saudi Arabia [online], The Harvard Crimson. Available at: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2010/2/12/saudi-education-students-school/, [Accessed: 04-09-2014].
 
[5]  Alromi, N., (2000), Vocational Education in Saudi Arabia, State College, PA: Penn State University.
 
[6]  Alsadaawi, A., (2008), An Investigation of Performance-Based Assessment in Science in Saudi Primary Schools, Cambridge.
 
[7]  Alsadaawi, A., (2010), Saudi National Assessment of Educational Progress (SNAEP), International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 5(11): pp. 1-14.
 
[8]  Al-Sadan, I., (2000), Educational Assessment in Saudi Arabian Schools, Assessment in Education, 7 (1): pp. 143-155.
 
[9]  Baehr, M., (2005), Distinctions between Assessment and Evaluation, Coe College, Faculty Guidebook, pp. 441-444.
 
[10]  Berry, R., (2008), Assessment for Learning, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
 
[11]  Black, P. & William, D., (1998), Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment, Phi Delta Kappan international, 80(2): pp. 139-148.
 
[12]  Black, P. & William, D., (2003), In Praise of Educational Research: Formative Assessment, British Educational Research Journal, 29: pp. 1-16.
 
[13]  Black, P., (1998), Formative Assessment: Raising standards inside the classroom. School Science Review, 90(291): pp. 39-46.
 
[14]  Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D., (2002), Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: King's College.
 
[15]  Broadfoot, P., & Black, P., (2004), 'Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1): pp. 7-26.
 
[16]  Chester, C., and Quilter, S. M., (1998), In-service teachers’ perceptions of educational assessment, Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 33(2): pp. 210-236.
 
[17]  Darling-Hammond, L., (1994), Performance-based assessment and educational equity, Harvard Educational Review, 64(1): pp. 1-27.
 
[18]  Department for Education (DfE), (2009), Report of the Secretary of State for Education Expert committee [online], United Kingdom, available at: http://publications.dcsf.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/Expert-Group-Report.pdf, [Accessed: 07-08-2014].
 
[19]  Dochy, F., & Segers, M., (2006), ‘Enhancing Student learning Through Assessment: Alignment between Levels of Assessment and Different Effects on learning,’ Studies in Educational Evaluation, Belgium, 32: pp. 171-179.
 
[20]  Earl, L., (2003), Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
 
[21]  Green, K. E., (1992), Differing options on testing between pre-service and in-service teachers, Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 37-42.
 
[22]  Harlen, W. and James, M., (1997), Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships between Formative and Summative Assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3): pp. 365-379.
 
[23]  Herman, J., & Choi, K., (2008), Formative Assessment and the Improvement of Middle School Science Learning: The Role of Teacher Accuracy, Los Angeles, University of California.
 
[24]  Izard, J., (2004), Gathering evidence for learning: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Melbourne.
 
[25]  Kadzamira, E. C., and Chibwana, M. P, (2000), Gender and primary schooling in Malawi, IDS Research Report, 40, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
 
[26]  Laker, E., (1996), what the research says about student assessment [online], Improving America's Schools: A Newsletter on Issues in School Reform: the U.S. Department of Education, available at: http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/IASA/newsletters/assess/pt4. html, [accessed: 08-07-2014].
 
[27]  Linn, M. A., (2008), ‘Library and information science education in Saudi Arabia,’ Education for Information, 14(3): pp. 195-214.
 
[28]  Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB), National Research Council, (1993), Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
 
[29]  McAlpine, M (2002), Principles of Assessment, Robert Clark Centre for Technological Education, University of Glasgow.
 
[30]  McMillan, J. H., (2001), Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices, Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 20(1): pp. 20-32.
 
[31]  McMillan, J.H., Myran, S., & Workman, D., (2002), Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices, Journal of Educational Research, 95(4): pp. 203-213.
 
[32]  Mertler, C.A. (1998). Classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Conference paper: EDRS
 
[33]  Ministry of Education (MOE), (2011), the mechanism of testing for intermediate and secondary stages [online], Saudi Arabia, available at http://portal.moe.gov.sa/Documents/ Mechanism%20tests.pdf [accessed: 10-08-2014].
 
[34]  Morgan, C., and Watson, A., (2002), The interpretative nature of teachers’ assessment of students’ mathematics: Issues for Equity, Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 33(2): pp. 78-110.
 
[35]  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), (1995), Assessment Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.
 
[36]  Newby, P., (2010), Research methods for Education, Harlow, Essex, Pearson Education Ltd.
 
[37]  Pamrasad, A., (1983), ‘On the definition of feedback,’ Behavioural Science, 28: pp. 4-13.
 
[38]  Petty, G., (2004), Teaching Today Practical approach, 3rd Ed., London: Nelson Thornes.
 
[39]  Rust, C., (2002), Purposes and Principles of Assessment, Oxford Brooks University
 
[40]  Sadler, D., (1989), Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems Instructional Science, 18: pp. 119-144.
 
[41]  Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission (SACM), (2010) Grading System in Saudi General Educational System [online], Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission, Washington, DC., available at http://www.sacm.org/Education/GradingEdu.aspx, [Accessed: 12-07-2014].
 
[42]  Shavelson, R.J., & the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory [SEAL], (2003), On the integration of Formative Assessment in Teaching and Learning with Implications of Teacher Education, Paper Presented at the Biannual Meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Padova, Italy.
 
[43]  Shepard, L. A., Flexer, R. J., Hiebert, E. H., Marion, S. F., Mayfield, V., & Weston, T. J., (1996), Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(3): pp. 7-18.
 
[44]  Suskie, L. A., (2009), Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide, 2nd Ed., Sanfrancisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
 
[45]  Taras, M., (2005), Assessment: Summative and Formative-Some Theoretical Reflections, British Journal of educational Studies, University of Sunderland, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 53(4): pp. 466-478.
 
[46]  Van, K., Amichand, S., Carkner, M., Ireland, M., Orynik, K., and Potter, J., (2007), Quality Assurance in PLAR: Issues and Strategies for Post-secondary Institutions, Quality Assurance in PLAR, volume 1.
 
[47]  Verman, J., Aschbacher, P., & Winters, L., (2008), ‘A practical guide to alternative assessment,’ ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED352389.
 
[48]  Webber, C. F., and Lupart, J. L., (2011) Leading Student Assessment, London: Springer.