American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(1), 44-49
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-1-8
Open AccessArticle

Analysis of Grades 7 and 8 Physics Textbooks: A Quantitative Approach

Zemenu Mihret Zewdie1,

1Debre Markos College of Teacher Education, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

Pub. Date: January 25, 2014

Cite this paper:
Zemenu Mihret Zewdie. Analysis of Grades 7 and 8 Physics Textbooks: A Quantitative Approach. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(1):44-49. doi: 10.12691/education-2-1-8

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to analyze grade 7 and 8 physics student textbooks for Ethiopian schools. The study was conducted based on the comments collected from the school teachers during physics handbook familiarization workshops. In addition, the Ministry of Education demands that textbooks currently in use as well as those that will be produced in the future will be greatly improved or revised. The main method of the research employed was content analysis. The different categories of grade 7 and 8 physics textbooks such as learning objectives, activities, figures and diagrams, text narratives, unit summaries, and end-of-unit exercises were sampled. Quantitative analysis techniques were employed and index values for students’ involvement were calculated. In addition, open-ended questionnaires were prepared, distributed, and collected from teachers and students to triangulate the data obtained from the six sample aspects of the textbooks. The data obtained from the textbooks were analyzed quantitatively and interpreted based on the index value interpretation guideline adapted from literature. The data obtained from the questionnaires were analyzed qualitatively and used to support the quantitative data. The results revealed that learning objectives were stated in all the units in the textbooks. In addition, the figures, diagrams, other drawings, and points that demand emphasis were put in attractive colors that grasp students for reading. However, the other aspects of the textbooks were found to have limitations. These aspects of the textbooks emphasized on memorization of facts, explanations, principles; the activities had immediate answers in the textbooks; figures and diagrams concentrated mainly for illustrative purpose; review questions and problems demanded simple memory and mere mathematical calculations based on previous learning of formulas; summaries reflected main points in the text narratives and limited to raise new questions and up-to-date scientific researches. Accordingly, conclusions were drawn and recommendations for further improvements and revisions were forwarded.

Keywords:
constructivism quantitative analysis of textbook student-centered textbook

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Amhara National Regional State Education Bureau (ANRSEB). (2001). Education statistics annual abstract. Bahir Dar. Harar Printing Press.
 
[2]  Bhatti, A. N. and Hashmi, A. M. (n.d). An evaluation of the physics textbook by secondary school teachers for general outlook and content relatedness suitability. Retrieved on Monday, December 02, 2013 from http://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed05/AbstractsFullPapers2005/files%5Csubtheme1%5CMAHNAB.pdf
 
[3]  Dalim, S.F.and Mubarrak, M. (2013). Quantitative method of textbook evaluation fro chemistry (KBSM) form 4 textbook. Retrieved on Friday, November 8, 2008 from http://worldconferences.net/proceedings/icssr2013/toc/240%20-%20SITI%20FAIRUZ%20DALIM%20%20QUANTITATIVE%20METHOD%20OF%20TEXTBOOK%20EVALUATION%20FOR%20CHEMISTRY%20(KBSM)%20FORM%204%20TEXTBOOK_done.pdf.
 
[4]  Engida, T. (2005). Chemistry Teaching in Secondary Schools (Ched 391). Addis Ababa University. Unpublished.
 
[5]  Haury, D. L., and Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. Retrieved on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/eric/eric-5.htm.
 
[6]  Khine, M. S. (2008). Analysis of science textbooks for instructional effectiveness. Retrieved on Monday, November, 26, 2013 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-007-4168-3_15.
 
[7]  Laws, P., and Horsley, M. (2006). Educational Equity? Textbooks in New South Wales Secondary Schools. Sydney: The University of Sydney.
 
[8]  Mergo, T. (2012). The extent to which the chemistry textbook of grade 11 is appropriate for learner-centered approach. AJCE, 2012, 2(3).
 
[9]  Ministry of Education. (2009 a). Physics Syllabus, Grades 7 and 8. Unpublished.
 
[10]  Ministry of Education. (2011a.). Physics Grade 7 Student Textbook. Dubai: Al Ghurair Printing and Publishing House LLC.
 
[11]  Ministry of Education. (2011b.). Physics Grade 8 Student Textbook. Dubai: Al Ghurair Printing and Publishing House LLC.
 
[12]  Ministry of Education. (2009b). Strategies for improving Science and Mathematics education in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Unpublished
 
[13]  MoE. (2002). The Education and Trainning Policy and Its Implimentation. Retrieved on Tuesday, December 03, 2013 from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Ethiopia/Ethiopia_education_policy_implementation.pdf.
 
[14]  National Academy of Sciences. (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
 
[15]  Redish, E.F. (2002). Teaching Physics with the physics suite. London: John Wiley and Sons
 
[16]  Robert, A. (1962). The teaching of science in the upper primary school: African Education Journal. 7(2):pp9-20. Lusaka
 
[17]  Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7 (17). Retrieved on Tuesday March, 09, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
 
[18]  Translational Government of Ethiopia (TGE). (1994). Education and Training Policy. Addis Ababa: EMPDA
 
[19]  UNESCO. (n.d). Objectives in the educational process. Retrieved on Tuesday, December 03, 2013 from http://www.unesco.org/webworld/ramp/html/r8810e/r8810e04.htm.
 
[20]  Wilson, R. (2008).Promoting the Development of Scientific Thinking. Retrieved on Tuesday, December 03, 2013 from http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleId=409.
 
[21]  Yimulaw, M. (2007). Modules and active learning. The Ethiopian Journal of Education. XXVII (1): pp 73-86. Addis Ababa.