[1] | T. M. Haladyna, S. M. Downing, and M. C. Rodriguez, “A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 309-333, 2002. |
|
[2] | F. Elikai and P. W. Schuhmann, “An examination of the impact of grading policies on students’achievement,” Issues Account. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 677-693, 2010. |
|
[3] | J. Schneider and E. Hutt, “Making the grade: a history of the A-F marking scheme,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 201-224, 2014. |
|
[4] | Thomas R. Guskey & Robert Thomas, “Perception of Teachers’ about Grading,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 4, no. 7, p. 2, 2001. |
|
[5] | CERID, “A Narrative Report of Proceeding of the National Seminar on Letter Grading System: Implication and its Impacts in Higher Education,” vol. 2016, no. 22 February, 2016. |
|
[6] | Kohn, “A History of Grading,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 3, no. 6, 1999. |
|
[7] | J. Malouff, “Bias in Grading,” Coll. Teach., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 191-192, 2008. |
|
[8] | A. KOHN, “The Case Against Grades,” Educ. Leadersh. Educ. Dig., no. January, pp. 8-16, 2012. |
|
[9] | J. Schinske and K. Tanner, “Feature Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently ),” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 13, pp. 159-166, 2014. |
|
[10] | M. P. Wagle, “New SLC grading system reflects students’ capability better,” Kathmandupost.com, 2016. |
|
[11] | R. Sawyer, “Beyond Correlations: Usefulness of High School GPA and Test Scores in Making College Admissions Decisions,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 89-112, 2013. |
|
[12] | A. Martinez, “Parent Involvement and Its Effects on Student,” Califonia State Univ. Stanislaus, no. May, 2015. |
|
[13] | CERID, “School Effectiveness in Nepal: A Synthesis of Indicators,” no. July, 2002. |
|
[14] | Malouff, “Effects of Grading on Student Learning and Alternative Assessment Strategies,” J. Curric. Stud., 2008. |
|
[15] | R. M. Krawczyk, “Effects of Grading on Student Learning and Alternative Assessment Strategies,” Eff. Grading Student Learn. Altern. Assess. Strateg. p. 45, 2017. |
|
[16] | C. Reddy, “Grading System in Education: Advantages and Disadvantages,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, p. 3, 2016. |
|
[17] | T. Isaacs, Assessment in Education in England, vol. 9, no. 1. 2012. |
|
[18] | D. M. Yesbeck, “Grading practices: Teachers’ considerations of academic and non-academic factors,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, pp. 31-164, 2011. |
|
[19] | J. S. Turner, “The relationship between secondary school teacher perception of student motivation and the effects of teacher professional development on student motivation.” vol. 68, no. 10-A, p. 4248, 2008. |
|
[20] | T. R. Guskey and L. J. Link, “Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 303-320, 2019. |
|
[21] | T. R. G. and S. M. Brookhart, “What We Know about Grading,” in The Science News-Letter, vol. 11, no. 306, 2019, p. 115. |
|
[22] | R. Simon, M., Tierney, R. D., Forgette-Giroux, R., Charland, J., Noonan, B., & Duncan, “A secondary school teacher’s description of the process of determining report card grades,” McGill J. Educ., vol. 45, pp. 535-554, 2010. |
|
[23] | S. M. Brookhart et al., “A Century of Grading Research: Meaning and Value in the Most Common Educational Measure,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 803-848, 2016. |
|
[24] | Starch, “Reliability of grading high school work in english, maths ad science,” J. Educ. Educ. Dev., vol. 21, no. 3, 1913. |
|
[25] | D. Starch, “Can the variability of marks be reduced?,” Sch. Soc., vol. 2, pp. 242-243, 1915. |
|
[26] | G. of N. Ministry of Education, LGS Nerdeshika First amendment 2073.12. Kathmandu, 2016, pp. 1-10. |
|
[27] | K. B. Cox, “Putting Classroom Grading on the Table: A Reform in Progress,” Am. Second. Educ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 67-87, 2011. |
|
[28] | K. O. Connor, “Part 1: How to Grade for Learning Presented by,” p. 156, 2009. |
|
[29] | J. A. Erickson, “a_call_to_action_transforming_grading_practices Eriksion Jaffrine A.pdf,” in Principal Leadership, pp. 42-46. |
|
[30] | S. M. Brookhart, “Teachers’ Grading: Practice and Theory,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2009, pp. 279-301, 1994. |
|
[31] | Youyi Sun and Liying Cheng, “Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and Values assigned,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 326-343, 2014. |
|
[32] | L. A. (2014) Swan, G. M., Guskey, T. R., & Jung, “Parents’ and Teachers’ perception of Standards-based and Traditional Report Cards.,” Educ. Assessment, Eval. Account. vol. 26, pp. 289-299, 2014. |
|
[33] | T. R. Guskey, “Grading-5-0-Alternatives.pdf,” in Zero alternatives, Principle Leadership, 2004, pp. 49-53. |
|
[34] | T. R. Guskey, “Making High School Grades Meaningful,” Phi Delta Kappa Int., vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 670-675, 2011. |
|
[35] | J. H. McMillan, “Secondary Teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices.” Educ. Meas. issues Pract., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 20-32, 2001. |
|
[36] | M. Simon & Schusternd, “Nora Rowley, 5th graders view of grades in Clements. A.,” Rep. Card, pp. 72-73, 2004. |
|
[37] | J. W. Creswell, QUALITATIVE INQUIRY & RESEARCH DESIGN, 3RD ed. USA: SABE Publications.Inc. 2013. |
|
[38] | C. O. Boyd, “Phenomenology the Method,” Nurshing Res. A Qual. Perspect., pp. 93-122, 2001. |
|
[39] | J. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998. |
|
[40] | Y. K. Djamba and W. L. Neuman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Pearson Ne., vol. 30, no. 3. USA: Pearson Education Limited, 2011. |
|
[41] | H. Venden Berg, “Qualitative Social Research,” Reanalyzing Qual. interviews from Differ. Angl. risk decontextualization other Probl. Shar. Qual. data. vol. 6, no. 1, 2005. |
|
[42] | B. S. Marriam, Qualitative research and case study applications in education. USA: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Oxford: Routledge. 1998. |
|
[43] | P. F. and M. L. Jonathan A. Smith, “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory Method and Research (Book Review),” no. January. Sage, 2009. |
|
[44] | C. S. DWECK, MINDSET_The New Psychology of Success. NEW YORK: RANDOM HOUSE NEW YORK, 2006. |
|
[45] | M. Crotty, “THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIAL RESEARCH: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process,” SAGE Publ., p. (9) 280, 1998. |
|
[46] | L.H Cross & R.B.Frary, “Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53-72, 1999. |
|
[47] | D. Iamarino, “The benefits of standards-based grading: A critical evaluation of modern grading practices,” Curr. Issues Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2014. |
|
[48] | Z. Munzur, “Reflections on the Impact of Absence of Summative Assessment on Students’ Motivation and Learning,” J. Educ. Futur., vol. 5, no. 2, 2014. |
|
[49] | J. M. S. &T. R. M. Douglas, “Sociology of education: an A-to-Z guide.” (J. Ainsworth, Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publ. Inc., 2013. |
|
[50] | T. R. Guskey, “Making the grade: What benefits students?,” Educ. Leadership., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 14-20, 1994. |
|
[51] | J. Khanal, “Corporal Punishment in Nepalese Private Schools: Perception of Teachers,” J. Am. Acad. Res., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1-9, 2015. |
|