American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2019, 7(12), 957-965
DOI: 10.12691/education-7-12-10
Open AccessArticle

The Development Instrument Test of PISA and Student Worksheet (LKPD) with Shape and Space Content Using RME Approach to Improve the Mathematic Representation Ability of High School Students

Chrisna Sinaga1, , KMS. Amin Fauzi1 and Izwita Dewi1

1Mathematics Education Postgraduate Program, State University of Medan, Medan, Indonesia

Pub. Date: December 22, 2019

Cite this paper:
Chrisna Sinaga, KMS. Amin Fauzi and Izwita Dewi. The Development Instrument Test of PISA and Student Worksheet (LKPD) with Shape and Space Content Using RME Approach to Improve the Mathematic Representation Ability of High School Students. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(12):957-965. doi: 10.12691/education-7-12-10

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce Student Worksheet (Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik / LKPD) and PISA-based test instruments that were valid, practical, effective and able to improve students mathematical representation abilities. This type of research was the Tessmer model development research. The trials in this study were conducted in class X-Science 3 and X-Science 4 of SMA Negeri 1 Dolok Batu Nanggar. From the results of trial I and trial II obtained: (1) LKPD and PISA-based test instruments on the developed RME model were valid and practical, but have not met effective criteria namely: a) classical student completeness of more than 85%; b) achievement of learning objectives of more than 75% for each item; c) students who gave a positive response of more than 80%; and d) achievement of learning time was the same as regular learning time; and (2) there was an increase in the average mathematical representation ability of students in the first trial was 0.4 with moderate and in the second trial was 0.6 in the medium category.

Keywords:
student worksheets test instruments PISA RME mathematical representation ability

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Novita, R & Niawati. 2016. The Application of Contextual Approach in Geometry Cubes and Blocks in 8th Grade Junior High School. Numeracy. Volume 3 No 1 pp 36-49.
 
[2]  Dewimarni, Syelfia. 2017. Analysis of Communication Skills and Understanding of Linear Algebra Concept for Students in Universitas Putra Indonesia ‘YPTK’ Padang. Mathematics Education Journal. Vol 8 No 1, 2017, pp 53-62.
 
[3]  NCTM. 1999. Mathematics Teacher. Volume 92 No. 1
 
[4]  Dwiyogo, Wasis. 2016. Teaching and Learning Process: Thinking and Problem Solving. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education Volume 6, Pg 121-129.
 
[5]  OECD, PISA. 2017. How Does PISA for Development measure mathematical literacy? Paris: OECD Publisher.
 
[6]  OECD. 2013. The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Problem Solving Knowledge Skills. Paris: Author, 2013.
 
[7]  Hasan, Buaddin. 2015. The Use of Scaffolding to Overcome Difficulties in Solving Mathematical Problems. Journal of Mathematics Study Program. Vol 1 No 1.
 
[8]  Choo, Serene. 2017. Effect of worksheet scaffolds on student learning in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education
 
[9]  Verenikina, Irina. 2008. Scaffolding and Learning: It’s role in Nurturing New Learners. Univesity of Wollongong Research Online
 
[10]  Minarni, Ani. 2016. Mathematical Understanding And Representation Ability Of Public Junior High School In North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education. Volume 7, No 1, pp 43-56.
 
[11]  Hmelo-Silver, C. E, Duncan, R. G, and Chin, C. A. 2006. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark” Journal of Educational Psychologist, 42 (2), 99-107.
 
[12]  Kamaliyah, Zulkardi. 2013. Developing the Sixth Level of PISA- Like Mathematics Problems for Secondary School Students. Journal Mathematics Education. Vol. 4 No. 1 January 2013, pp. 9-28
 
[13]  Tessmer, Martin. 1993. Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. Philadephia: Kogan.
 
[14]  Sugiyono. 2011. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung.
 
[15]  Arikunto, S. 2013. Research Procedure: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
 
[16]  Kurniati, Intan. 2018. The Development of Student Worksheet Based on PISA to Improve Problem Solving Ability. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018, 6(11), 1581-1585.
 
[17]  Hake, RR. 1998. "Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Data Test for Introductory Physics Courses," American Journal of Physics, 66 (1).
 
[18]  Barniol, P and Zavala, G. 2016. "A Tutorial Worksheet to Help Students Develop the Ability to Interpret the Dot Product as a Projection," Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (9). 2387-2398.
 
[19]  Askois, A & Jailani. 2017."Effectiveness of Worksheet with Problem Solving Approach," Proceeding: International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics
 
[20]  Haruehansawasin, S and Kiattikomol, P, "Scaffolding in Problem Based Learning for Low-Achieving Learners," The Journal of Educational Research.
 
[21]  Charmila, Ninik. 2016. PISA Model Mathematics Development Using the Jambi Context. Journal of Educational Research & Evaluation. Volume 20, No. 2, Dec 2016 (198-207).
 
[22]  Naimah, K.2016. Effectiveness of Solution-Based Mathematics Worksheets Problems, Muhammadiyah University Surakarta, Surakarta.