American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Educational Research. 2019, 7(7), 463-470
DOI: 10.12691/education-7-7-5
Open AccessSpecial Issue

Regulation 274: Barrier or Opportunity for Newly Certified Ontario Teachers?

Blaine E. Hatt1, , Nancy Maynes1 and Anna Liisa Mottonen1

1Nipissing University

Pub. Date: July 02, 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hiring Teachers: The Issues)

Cite this paper:
Blaine E. Hatt, Nancy Maynes and Anna Liisa Mottonen. Regulation 274: Barrier or Opportunity for Newly Certified Ontario Teachers?. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(7):463-470. doi: 10.12691/education-7-7-5


Newly certified teachers in the province of Ontario, Canada encounter a series of hurdles imposed by Regulation 274 before they qualify for full-time employment in the profession. Provincial Faculties of Education and US border colleges, which were certifying Ontario teachers, graduated an unprecedented number of newly certified teachers. Between the years 2006 - 2015, the annual surplus of newly certified teachers in the province reached 7,800. Faced with the results of heavy over-certification and underemployment of teachers brought on in large part by lax government control and seemingly unrestricted access to teacher education programmes, the provincial government initiated an ill-conceived reaction and introduced legislation, known as Regulation 274, to staunch the flow of newly certified teachers. In addition to Regulation 274, the government launched a plan-of-action that resulted in changing the one-year teacher education program to a two-year program while cutting the number of seats available within Faculties of Education to one-half post 2015 numbers. Regulation 274, characterized at the time by the Premier, as an “over-correction”, required newly certified teachers, beginning in 2015, to be subject to policies and standards that restricted their immediate entry into the rank and file of classroom teachers. While the trend in supply and demand has favoured employment opportunities for Ontario teachers since 2016, Regulation 274 is still in effect. Given the restrictions of 274 and the added expense of another year of specialized education, this study sought to identify the job-seeking behaviours and plans, in the current employment climate of the province of the first cohort of graduates from the two-year program in a northern Ontario university, exiting in 2017. Employment prospects and other social factors were found to influence employment decisions of these new teachers.

regulation 274 teacher education programmes employment of newly certified teachers

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Toronto: Alfred A Knopf Canada.
[2]  Hatt, B. E., Maynes, N. & Kmiec, J. (2015). What’s wrong with getting teacher hiring right?. In N. Maynes & B. E. Hatt (Eds.) The Complexity of Hiring, Supporting, and Retaining New Teachers in Canada. (pp. 179-194). Canadian Association for Teacher Education/Association canadienne pour la formation à l’enseignement.
[3]  Ontario College of Teachers. (2015). Transition to teaching 2015. Retrieved from:
[4]  Province of Ontario. (2013). Education Act Ontario Regulation 274/12 Hiring Practices. Retrieved from:
[5]  Ontario College of Teachers. (2018). Transition to teaching 2018. Retrieved from:
[6]  Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill.
[7]  Glasow, P. A. (2005). Fundamentals of survey research methodology. McLean, VA: Mitre.
[8]  Kraemer, K. L. (1991). Introduction. Paper presented at The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods.
[9]  Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 75-105.
[10]  Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[11]  Klemenčič, M. & Chirikov, I. (2015). How do we know how students experience higher education? On the use of student surveys. Retrieved from:…/tsle_m_klemenic_i_chirikov_final_ic_mk_changes_accepted….
[12]  McIntyre, L. J. (1999). The practical skeptic: Core concepts in sociology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
[13]  Campbell, T. D., & Profetto-McGraff, J. (2013). Skills and attributes required by clinical nurse specialists to promote evidence-based practices. Clinical Nurse Specialists, 27(5), 245-254.
[14]  Gibbert, W. S., Keating, S. M., Jacobs, J. A., Dodson, E., Baker, E., Diem, G., Giles, W., Gillespie, K. N., Grabaukas, v., Shatchkute, A., & Brownson, R. C. (2013). Training the workforce in evidence-based public health: An evaluation of impact among U.S. international practitioners. PubMed Resources. Retrieved from pubmed/24007676
[15]  Bell, S. (1996). Learning with information systems: Learning cycles in information systems development. New York: Routledge.
[16]  Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[17]  Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (1999). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[18]  Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[19]  Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1997). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
[20]  Fowler, J., & Floyd, J. (1995). Improving survey question: Design and evaluation. (Vol. 38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[21]  Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (1998). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[22]  Tourangeau, R. (1999). Interdisciplinary survey methods research. In M.G. Sirken, D. J. Herrmamm, S. Schechter, N. Schwartz, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition and survey research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[23]  Spain, R. D., Priest, H., & Murphy, J. (2012). Current trends in adaptive training with military applications: An introduction. Military Psychology, 24(2), 87-95.
[24]  Hudson, P., Skamp, K., & Brooks, L. (2005). Development of an instrument: Mentoring for effective primary science teaching. Science Teacher Education, 89(4) 657- 674.
[25]  Narayan, A. P., Whicker, S. A., Staples, B. B., Bookman, J., Bartlett, K. W., & McGann, K. A. (2014). Using an innovative curriculum evaluation tool to inform program improvement: The clinical skills fair. Journal of Graduate Medical Education.
[26]  Ennis, C. D., & Hooper, L. M. (1988). Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 277-280.
[27]  Owen, J. M. (2007). Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches (3 ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
[28]  Tepper, K., Shaffer, B. C., & Tepper, B. J. (1996). Latent structure of mentoring function scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 848-857.
[29]  Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley and Son.
[30]  Malaney, G. D. (2002). You still need high response rates with web-based surveys. Student Affairs On-Line, 3(1).