American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2019, 7(7), 455-462
DOI: 10.12691/education-7-7-4
Open AccessSpecial Issue

Improving the Outcomes of the “Prediction Problem”: A Framework Approach to Teacher Hiring

Jerome Cranston1,

1University of Regina

Pub. Date: July 02, 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hiring Teachers: The Issues)

Cite this paper:
Jerome Cranston. Improving the Outcomes of the “Prediction Problem”: A Framework Approach to Teacher Hiring. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(7):455-462. doi: 10.12691/education-7-7-4

Abstract

This article describes how a deliberate commitment to use a research-based framework of teaching effectiveness can be combined with existing hiring practices to yield better outcomes from the teacher screening and selection process. The author proposes that when school leaders apply a well-developed and agreed-upon framework of teaching effectiveness – one that reflects the expectations of what it means to be effective in a local school context - that the result will be a better hiring process than many of those currently employed. In the end, such a process means that those who demonstrate the greatest promise of being effective in the classroom will be more likely given the opportunity to teach.

Keywords:
teacher hiring teaching effectiveness framework assessment

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Gladwell, M. (2008, December 15). Most likely to succeed. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/12/15/most-likely-to-succeed-malcolm-gladwell.
 
[2]  Shulman. L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
 
[3]  Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43-74.
 
[4]  Hanushek, E., A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466-479. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w16606.pdf.
 
[5]  Cranston, J. (2012a). Evaluating prospects: The criteria used to hire new teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 350-367.
 
[6]  Cranston, J. (2012b). Exploring school principals’ hiring decisions: Fitting in and getting hired. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 135. Retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/42835.
 
[7]  Cranston, J. (2014). Navigating the Bermuda Triangle of teacher hiring practices in Canada. In N. Maynes & B. Hatt (eds.), Hiring Supporting Retaining New Teachers Across Canada (pp. 128-149). Canadian Association forTeacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.edu.uwo.ca/faculty-profiles/docs/other/pollock/Hiring-Supporting-Retaining-New-Teachers-Across-Canada-8.pdf.
 
[8]  Spector, P. E. (2012). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
 
[9]  Wong, R. & Wong, H. (2011). Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers and Principals. Retrieved from: http://www.newteacher.com/pdf/INSIGHT_SP11.pdf
 
[10]  Danielson, C. (2010/2011). Evaluations that help teacher. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35-39.
 
[11]  Kuncel, N. R., Ones, D. S., & Klieger, D. M. (2014, May). In hiring, algorithms beat instincts. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2014/05/in-hiring-algorithms-beat-instinct.
 
[12]  Stronge, J. (2010). Evaluating what good teachers do: Eight research-based standards for assessing teacher excellence. Larchmont, NY: Eyes on Education.
 
[13]  Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
 
[14]  Merriam, S. B. & Simpson, E. L. (2000). A guide to research for educators and trainers of adults (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
 
[15]  Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
[16]  Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
 
[17]  Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
 
[18]  Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Developing a differentiated model. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
 
[19]  Ritchie J. & Lewis J.(2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: Sage.
 
[20]  Whitehurst, G. R., Chingos, M. M., & Lindquist, K. M. (2014, May). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Brown Centre on Education Policy at Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Evaluating-Teachers-with-Classroom-Observations.pdf.
 
[21]  Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. MET Project Research Paper. Retrieved from http://k12education.gatesfoundation.org/download/?Num=2676&f ilename=MET_Validating_Using_Random_Assignment_Research_Paper.pdf.
 
[22]  Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
[23]  Levin, J., & Quinn, M. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. The New Teacher Project.
 
[24]  Liu, E. & Johnson, S. M. (2006). New teachers’ experiences of hiring: Late, rushed, and information-poor. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 324–360.
 
[25]  Ryan, A. M. & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65 693-717.
 
[26]  Henry, G. T., Campbell, S. L. Thompson, C. L., Patriarca, L. A., Luterbach, K. J., Lys, D. B., & Covington, V. M. (2013). The predictive validity of measures of teacher candidate programs and performance: toward an evidence-based approach to teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5) 439-453.
 
[27]  Abernathy, T., Forsyth, A., & Mitchell, J. (2001). The bridge from student to teacher: What principals, teacher education faculty and students value in a teaching applicant. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 109-119.
 
[28]  Braun, J., Willems, A., Brown, M., & Green, K. (1987). A survey of hiring practices in selected school districts. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 45-49.
 
[29]  Cain-Caston, M. (1999). A survey of opinions of North Carolina school administrators regarding factors considered most important in hiring teachers for their first teaching positions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(2), 69-73.
 
[30]  Ralph, E. G., Kersten, C., Lang, H., & Smith, D. (1998). Hiring new teachers: What do school districts look for? Journal of Teacher Education, 49(1), 47-57.
 
[31]  Theel, R. K. & Tallerico, M. (2004). Using portfolios for teacher hiring: Insights from school principals. Action in Teacher Education, 26(1), 26-33.
 
[32]  Darling-Hammond, L. & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
 
[33]  Hayton, G. & Wagner, Z. (1998) Performance assessment in vocational education and training. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Education Research, 6(1), 69-85.
 
[34]  Lurie, S. J. (2012). History and practice of competency-based assessment. Medical Education, 2012(46), 49-57.
 
[35]  Danielson, C. (2013). The Framework for Teaching: Evaluation Instrument. Princeton, NJ; The Danielson Group.
 
[36]  Lesmond, G., Mc Cahan, S., & Beach, D. (2017). Development of analytic rubrics for competency assessment. Toronto, ON: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
 
[37]  McDaniel M. A., Whetzel, D., Schmidt, F. L, & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599-616.
 
[38]  El Khadri, M. S. & Roth, W. M. (2015). The teaching practicum as a locus of multi-level, school-based transformation. Teaching Education, 26, 17-37. Retrieved from http://web.uvic.ca/~mroth/PREPRINTS/teachingR.pdf.
 
[39]  Macan, T. (2009). The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review,19 (3), 203-218.
 
[40]  Wiesner, W. H. & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
 
[41]  Campion, M., Palmer, D., & Campion, J. (1998). Structuring employment interviews to improve reliability, validity, and users' reactions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 77-82. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182509.
 
[42]  Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
 
[43]  Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior-based interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 577-580.
 
[44]  Janz, T., Hellervik L., & Gilmore D. (1986). Behavior Description Interviewing. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
 
[45]  Latham, G. P. & Sue-Chan, C. (1996). A legally defensible interview for selecting the best. In R. S. Barrett (Ed.), Fair employment strategies in human resource management (pp. 134-143). New York, NY: Quorum Books.
 
[46]  Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Hudson, J. P. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 998-1002.
 
[47]  Delli, D. A. & Vera, E. M. (2003). Psychological and contextual influences on the teacher selection interview: A model for future research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(2), 137-155.
 
[48]  Engel, M. (2012). Problematic preferences? A mixed method examination of what principals look for when hiring teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 52-91.
 
[49]  Rutledge, S. A., Harris, D. N., Thompson, C. C., & Ingle, W. K. (2008). Certify, blink, hire: An examination of the process and tools of teacher screening and selection. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(3), 237-263.
 
[50]  Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., O'Brien, D. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The Market for Teacher Quality. (NBER Working Paper Series No. 11154). Retrieved from: https://www.nber.org/papers/w11154.pdf.
 
[51]  Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.
 
[52]  Staiger D. O. & Rockoff, J. E. (2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 97-117.
 
[53]  Mertler, C. A. (2014). The data-driven classroom: How do I use student data to improve instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
 
[54]  Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.