American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2019, 7(3), 194-198
DOI: 10.12691/education-7-3-2
Open AccessCase Study

Young Scientists Discovering Food Web: An IBSE (Inquiry Based Science Education) Activity at Zoo Delle Maitine (Benevento, Italy)

Rizzelli Daniele1, and Pagliarulo Lorella Pina2

1Head of Education, Zoo delle Maitine, Pesco Sannita, Italy

2Head Keeper, Zoo delle Maitine, Pesco Sannita, Italy

Pub. Date: March 02, 2019

Cite this paper:
Rizzelli Daniele and Pagliarulo Lorella Pina. Young Scientists Discovering Food Web: An IBSE (Inquiry Based Science Education) Activity at Zoo Delle Maitine (Benevento, Italy). American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(3):194-198. doi: 10.12691/education-7-3-2

Abstract

The IBSE approach in the study of science allows pupils to formulate themselves the questions to which they need to find an answer. Is a highly stimulating approach that was used in an Educational Activity about food web at the Zoo. Starting from the observation of living creatures (from insects to reptiles and small mammals as well) and then posing themselves questions, kids were stimulated to find answers and to hypothesize conjectures. The success, calculated by questionnaires, both between kids and teachers, and checking every five minutes the attention of students, was great and the lesson about food web in nature was, for sure, learned. A total of 480 students participated in the activities; 69 teachers were present and questioned at the end of activities: 25 had the IBSE lab, 44 the non IBSE. Opinions about both activities, IBSE and NON IBSE, were generally good but the activity conducted with the IBSE method scored a higher value so the IBSE method was a great success.

Keywords:
IBSE methodology zoo zoo education conservation education food web

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Hyson J. (2004). Education, entertainment, and institutional identity at the Zoo. Curator 47: 247-51.
 
[2]  Dierking L.D., Burtnyk K., Buchner K.S., Falk J.H. (2002). Visitor Learning in Zoos, and Aquariums: A Literature Review. Silver Spring, MD: American Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
 
[3]  Turley S.K. (2001) Children and the demand for recreational experiences: The case of zoos. Leisure studies 20: 1-18.
 
[4]  Moss A., Jensen E. and Gusset M. (2015) Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Conservation Biology 29: 537-544.
 
[5]  Gusset M. & Dick G. (2011) The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology 30: 566-569.
 
[6]  Tavares A.C., Silva S., Bettencourt T. (2015). Advantages of science education outdoors through IBSE methodology. Innovation in higher education. Teaching and learning, volume 4, 151-169.
 
[7]  Bošnjak et al. 2014. An IBSE (Inquiry Based Science Education) approach in teaching sciences using external environment of the school and computing platform. J. BioSci. Biotech. 2014, SE/ONLINE: 115-121.
 
[8]  Bernard et al. 2012. Introduction of Inquiry Based Science Education into polish science curriculum. General findings of teacher’s attitude. CHEM DIDACT ECOL METROL. 2012; 17(1-2): 49-59.
 
[9]  Aksela M, J.A. (2010). Taking IBSE into Secondary School. Report on the conference, York, UK, October 27-29 2010.
 
[10]  Narode R (1987) Teaching Thinking Skills: Science. Washington, DC, National Education Association.
 
[11]  Kyle W C (1985) What research says: Science through discovery: Students love it. Science and Children 23(2), 39-41.
 
[12]  Rakow S J (1986) Teaching Science as Inquiry. Fastback 246. Bloomington, Phi Delta Kappa Educ. Found.
 
[13]  Tavares A.C., Silva S., Bettencourt T. (2015). Advantages of applying the IBSE method: the Coimbra Inquire Course case-study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 (2015): 174-178.
 
[14]  Rudd, T. (2008). Reimagining outdoor learning spaces. Futurelab Ed.Bristol. UK.
 
[15]  Bora, S., McCrea, E., Gay, M., Herrmann, L., Hutchison, L., Pistillo, M.B. et al. (2010). Early childhood environment education programs: guidelines for excellence. Washington: The North American Association for Environmental Education Publications.
 
[16]  Demeo, S. (2005). Gazing at the Hand: A Foucaultian View of the Teaching of Manipulative Skills to Introductory Chemistry Students in the United States and the Potential for Transforming Laboratory Instruction. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(3), 295-338. Wiley.
 
[17]  Gatt S, Tunnicliffe S, Borg K, Lautier K. (2007). Young maltese children’s ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 117-121.
 
[18]  Patrick P, Tunnicliffe S.D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 630-642.
 
[19]  Tavares A.C. (2013). Explorers in the bothanic garden: An IBSE model on biodiversity and climate change. O/El Botanico – Revista da Associação Ibero-Macaronesica de Jardins Botanicos, 7, 47-50.