Digital Technologies
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/dt Editor-in-chief: Piter Vorobienko
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Digital Technologies. 2015, 1(1), 17-21
DOI: 10.12691/dt-1-1-4
Open AccessArticle

A Case Study on P2P Computing System for Digital Network and Different Simulation Tools

Anwar Mohd. Mansuri1,

1Computer Science & Engineering, MIT Mandsaur, Mandsaur, India

Pub. Date: May 31, 2015

Cite this paper:
Anwar Mohd. Mansuri. A Case Study on P2P Computing System for Digital Network and Different Simulation Tools. Digital Technologies. 2015; 1(1):17-21. doi: 10.12691/dt-1-1-4

Abstract

Computer network technologies have been growing explosively and the study in computer networks is being challenging task system participants want to get the final result, In this research work central node may become overloaded, especially if many nodes request the result at the same time. This work present a proposal to build a high throughput computing system totally based upon the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) paradigm. In this work discuss the general characteristics of P2P systems this way we avoid overloading the central node, as well as network congestion we assume that the computing system works on the top of an overlay network. Here present a complete description of the P2P computing system shows a classification of the tools used in communications networks. And we discuss how different simulation tools used in different area like educational research, commercial research is done on P2P system.

Keywords:
network P2P NS distributed system computing systems simulation tools

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Y. Breitbart, M. Garofalakis, B. Jai, C. Martin, R. Rastogi, A. Silbershatz, Topology discovery in heterogenous IP networks: the NetInventory system, IEEE/ ACM Transactions on Networking 12 (3) (2004) 401-414.
 
[2]  Stuart Kurkowski, Tracy Camp, Michael Colagross, MANET simulation studies: the incredibles, ACM SIGMOBILE MCCR 9 (4) (2005) 50-61.
 
[3]  M.A. Rahman, A. Pakstas, F.Z. Wang, Network modelling and simulation tools, in: Proceedings of the Eighth EPSRC Annual Postgraduate Symposium on the Convergence of telecommunications, Networking and Broadcasting (EPSRC PGNet 2007), Liverpool John Moores University, June 28-29, Liverpool, UK, 2007.
 
[4]  Humayun Akhtar, An Overview of some network modeling, simulation & performance analysis tools, in: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC’97), 1997, pp. 344-348.
 
[5]  Jukka K. Nurminen, Models and algorithms for network planning tools – practical experiences, System Analysis Laboratory Research Reports, Helsinki University of Technology, May 2003.
 
[6]  R.S. Cahn, Wide Area Network Design: Concepts and Tools for Optimization, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, 1989.
 
[7]  Ma H. (Bob), Network Design Tool, Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 1989.
 
[8]  D.W. Bachmann, M.E. Segal, M.D. Srinivasan, T.J. Teorey, NetMod: A Design Tool for Large–Scale Heterogeneous Campus Network. Center for Information Technology Integration (CITI), University of Michigan, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, January 1991, vol. 9(1),pp-15-24.
 
[9]  Davis C.M. Wood, Sean S. Coleman, Michael F. Schwartz, Fremont: a system for discovering network characteristics and problems, in: Proceedings of the USENIX Winter Conference, 25-29 January, San Diego, CA, 1993, pp. 335-348.
 
[10]  R. Samanta, T. Funkhouser, K. Li, Parallel rendering with K-way replication, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Symposium on Parallel and Large-Data Visualization and Graphics, 2001, pp. 75-84.
 
[11]  D. Hughes, J. Walkerdine, Distributed video encoding over a Peer-to-Peer network, in: The Proceedings of PREP 2005, vol. 1, 2005.
 
[12]  S. Draves, The interpretation of dreams, an explanation of the electric sheep distributed screen-saver.
 
[13]  A. Legout, G. Urvoy-Keller, P. Michiardi, Understanding BitTorrent: an experimental perspective, Technical Report, INRIA-00000156, 2005.
 
[14]  B. Godfrey, K. Lakshminarayanan, S. Surana, R.M. Karp, I. Stoica, Load balancing in dynamic structured p2p systems, in: INFOCOM.
 
[15]  I.T. Foster, C. Kesselman, The globus project: a status report, in: Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, pp. 4-18.
 
[16]  R. Gupta, V. Sekhri, A.K. Somani, Compup2p: an architecture for internet computing using peer-to-peer networks, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 17 (2006) 1306-1320.
 
[17]  G. Chmaj, K. Walkowiak, A p2p computing system for overlay networks, Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (1) (2013) 242-249.
 
[18]  J.-C. Charr, R. Couturier, D. Laiymani, Jacep2p-v2: a fully decentralized and fault tolerant environment for executing parallel iterative asynchronous applications on volatile distributed architectures, Future Generation Computer Systems 27 (2011) 606-613.
 
[19]  Giovanni Vigna, Fredrik Valeur, Jingyu Zhou, Richard A. Kemmerer, Composable tool for network discovery and security analysis, in: 18th Annual Computer Security Application Conference, 09–13 December, San Diego CA, 2002, pp. 14-24.
 
[20]  M.A. Rahman, A. Pakstas, F.Z. Wang, An approach to integration of network design and simulation tools, in: Proceedings of the Eighth International IEEE Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL 2005), Zagreb, Croatia, June 15–17, 2005, pp. 173–180
 
[21]  J.M. Pullen, The network workbench: network simulation software for academic investigation of internet concepts, Computer Networks. Elsevier Science Ltd, March 2000, vol. 3(3), 2000, pp. 365-378.
 
[22]  B.L. Barnett III, An ethernet simulator for undergraduate networking, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, in: Proceedings of the 24th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, vol. 25(1), Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1993, pp. 145-150.
 
[23]  D. Griffin, Traffic engineering for quality of services in the internet, at large-scale, Technical Report, CEC Deliverable Number: 201/UCL/bl, TEQUILA Consortium, 2000.
 
[24]  C. Alaettinoglu, I. Dussa-Zieger, A.U. Matta, Shankar, O. Gudmundsson, Introducing MaRS, a Routing Testbed, ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 95-96.
 
[25]  G.F. Riley, M.H. Ammar, Simulation large networks: how big is big enough? in: Proceedings of First International Conference on Grand Challenge for Modeling and Simulation, San Antonio, TX, 2002, pp. 39-45.
 
[26]  M.A. Rahman, A. Pakstas, F.Z. Wang, An approach to integration of network design and simulation tools, in: Proceedings of the Eighth International IEEE Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL 2005), Zagreb, Croatia, June 15-17, 2005, pp. 173-180.
 
[27]  Y. Breitbart, M. Garofalakis, B. Jai, C. Martin, R. Rastogi, A. Silbershatz, Topology discovery in heterogenous IP networks: the NetInventory system, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12 (3) (2004) 401-414.
 
[28]  S. Park, A. Savvides, M.B. Srivastava, SensorSim: a simulation framework for sensor networks, in: International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2000, pp. 104-111.
 
[29]  S. Penz, Wireless multicast support for the NS-2 emulation environment, in: Proceedings of the Fifteenth IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, 2007, pp. 267-273.
 
[30]  Giovanni Vigna, Fredrik Valeur, Jingyu Zhou, Richard A. Kemmerer, Composable tool for network discovery and security analysis, in: 18th Annual Computer Security Application Conference, 09–13 December, San Diego CA, 2002, pp. 14-24.