Chemical Engineering and Science
ISSN (Print): 2328-7381 ISSN (Online): 2328-7373 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ces Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Chemical Engineering and Science. 2013, 1(2), 27-31
DOI: 10.12691/ces-1-2-3
Open AccessArticle

Effect of pH and Treatment Time on the Removal of Arsenic Species from Simulated Groundwater by Using Fe3+ and Ca2+ Impregnated Granular Activated Charcoals

P. Mondal1, , B. Mohanty1 and C. B. Majumder1

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India

Pub. Date: April 30, 2013

Cite this paper:
P. Mondal, B. Mohanty and C. B. Majumder. Effect of pH and Treatment Time on the Removal of Arsenic Species from Simulated Groundwater by Using Fe3+ and Ca2+ Impregnated Granular Activated Charcoals. Chemical Engineering and Science. 2013; 1(2):27-31. doi: 10.12691/ces-1-2-3

Abstract

This paper deals with the removal of arsenic species from simulated groundwater containing arsenic (As(III):As(V): 1:1), Fe and Mn in concentrations of 0.188mg/l, 2.8mg/l and 0.6mg/l respectively, by surface modified granular activated charcoals produced by impregnating Fe3+ and Ca2+ on GAC surface. Effects of pH and treatment time on the removal of arsenic species by using these adsorbents have been compared. The phenomenon has been explained on the basis of individual pHzpc of oxides and metal complexes present in the adsorbents. The present approach clearly explains the adsorption of negatively charged arsenic species at high pH (>11). Under optimum process conditions at neutral pH, Fe3+ impregnated granular activated charcoal (GAC-Fe) has been found more efficient for the treatment of contaminated groundwater than Ca2+ impregnated granular activated charcoal (GAC-Ca). Treatment time for equilibrium adsorption of arsenic species on GAC-Ca is found to be less than that of GAC-Fe.

Keywords:
arsenic GAC-Fe GAC-Ca pHzpc adsorption surface modification

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 3

References:

[1]  Mohan, D. and Pittman C.U., “Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents-A critical review”, J. Hazardous Materials”, 142(1-2), 1-53, April 2007.
 
[2]  Goel, R., Kapoor S.K., Misra K. and Sarma R.K., “Removal of arsenic from water by different adsorbents”, Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 11(4), 518-525, 2004.
 
[3]  Gu, Z., Deng B. and Fang J., “Preparation and evaluation of GAC-based iron-containing adsorbents for arsenic removal”, Environmental Science &Technology, 39(10), 3833-3843, April 2005.
 
[4]  Fierro V., Muñiz G., Gonzalez-Sánchez G., Ballinas M.L. and Celzard A., “Arsenic removal by iron-doped activated carbons prepared by ferric chloride forced hydrolysis”. J. Hazardous Materials, 168(1), 430-437, August 2009.
 
[5]  Haque M. N., Morrison G. M., Aguilera I. C. and Torresdey I. C., “Iron-modified light expanded clay aggregates for the removal of arsenic(V) from groundwater”, Microchemical Journal, 88(1), 7-13, February 2008.
 
[6]  Tripathy, S. S. and Raichur A.M., “Enhanced adsorption capacity of activated alumina by impregnation with alum for removal of As (V) from water”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 138(1-3), 179-186, May 2008.
 
[7]  Mondal, P., Mohanty B., Bhandari N. and Majumder C.B., “Removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater by GAC-Fe: A Modeling approach”, AIChE Journal, 55(7), 1860-1871, July 2009.
 
[8]  Mondal, P., Mohanty B. and Majumder C.B., “Treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater using calcium impregnated granular activated carbon in batch reactor: Optimization of process parameters”, Clean, Soil, Air, Water, 38(2), 229-239, February 2010.
 
[9]  Mondal, P., Majumder C. B., and Mohanty B., “A Laboratory study for the treatment of arsenic, iron, and manganese bearing ground water using Fe+3 impregnated activated carbon: Effects of shaking time, pH and temperature”, J. Hazardous Materials, 144(1-2), 420-426, June 2007.
 
[10]  Manju, G. N., Raji C. and Anirudhan T. S., “Evaluation of coconut husk carbon for the removal of arsenic from water”, Water Research, 32(10), 3062-3070, October 1998.
 
[11]  Donkova, B., Penchava J. and Djarova, M., “ Influence of complex formation upon inclusion of Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) in ZnC2O4.2H2O”, Crystal Research and Technology, 39(3), 207-213, March 2004.
 
[12]  Mondal, P., Mohanty B. and Majumder C.B., “Removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater using GAC-Ca in batch reactor: Kinetic and equilibrium studies”, Clean, Soil, Air, Water, 40(5), 506-514, May 2012.