Biomedical Science and Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2373-1257 ISSN (Online): 2373-1265 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2015, 3(1), 15-22
DOI: 10.12691/bse-3-1-4
Open AccessArticle

Assessment Evaluation of Bio-Ethanol Yield for Energizing Prosthetics Production Plant Based on Bacterial Growth and Shaking Rate

C. I. Nwoye1, , P. C. Agu2, B. C. Chukwudi3, S. O. Nwakpa1, I. A. Ijomah1 and N. E. Idenyi4

1Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

2Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria

3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria

4Department of Industrial Physics, Ebonyi State University, Abakiliki, Nigeria

Pub. Date: June 25, 2015

Cite this paper:
C. I. Nwoye, P. C. Agu, B. C. Chukwudi, S. O. Nwakpa, I. A. Ijomah and N. E. Idenyi. Assessment Evaluation of Bio-Ethanol Yield for Energizing Prosthetics Production Plant Based on Bacterial Growth and Shaking Rate. Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2015; 3(1):15-22. doi: 10.12691/bse-3-1-4


This paper presents an assessment evaluation of bio-ethanol yield based on the bacteria growth (BG) and shaking rate (SR) during bioprocessing of sugar cane molasses with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Critical computational analysis of generated experimental results indicates that the bio-ethanol yield response typified an empirical model which is exponential-linear in nature. The model was validated prior to evaluation of the yield response coefficient and predictive analysis of generated results. The validity of the derived model expressed as; ζ = 4.6335e[0.0068(ϑ/ɤ)] + 0.00012₰ - 0.00004ε was rooted on the core model expression ζ - 0.00012 ₰ = 4.6335e 0.0068(ϑ/ɤ) - 0.00004ε where both sides of the expression are correspondingly approximately equal. Results of ethanol yield were generated using regression model and its trend of distribution was compared with that from derived model for the purpose of verifying its validity relative to experimental results. The results of the verification process show very close dimensions of covered areas and alignment of curves designating ethanol yield, which precisely translated into significantly similar trend of data point’s distribution for experimental (ExD), derived model (MoD) and regression model-predicted (ReG) results. Ethanol yield per unit input ratio SR/ BG were evaluated from experimental, derived model & regression model predicted results as 0.0496, 0.0573 & 0.0565 rpm/ O.D respectively. Standard errors incurred in predicting ethanol yield for each value of SR, BG & SR/ BG considered as obtained from experiment, derived model and regression model were 0.13369, 0.9674 and 1.3380%, 1.3096, 1.3615 and 1.5300 % & 1.3701, 0.5969 and 1.1459 x 10-5 respectively. The operationally viable deviation range of model-predicted ethanol yield from the experimental results was 0.9 -13.47 %. This translated into 86.53-99.1 % operational confidence and reliability level for the derived models, as well as 0.86 - 0.99 yield response coefficient of ethanol to the input ratio SR/ BG. Consequently, in order to obtain high confidence level, the derived model considers input parameter value; 50 rpm (shaking rate) very extraneous. This was as a result of 23.66% deviation associating the use of this input parameter value.

Bio-Ethanol yield input ratio of shaking rate and microbial growth bioprocessing sugar cane molasses Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Osman, M. E., Khattab, O. H., Hammad, I. A., El-Hussieny, N. I. (2011).Optimization of Bio-Fuel Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Isolated from Sugar Cane Bagasse. Journal of American Science. 7(5):485-492.
[2]  Shahbazali, E. (2013).Biorefinery: From Biomass to Chemicals and Fuel. Green Processing and Synthesis. 2(1): 87-88.
[3]  Gaur, K., (2006). Process Optimization for the Production of Ethanol via Fermentation. MSc. Dissertation, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala.
[4]  Antunes, F. A. F, Chandel, A. K., Milessi, T. S. S., Santos, J. C., Rosa, C. A., and Da Silva, S. S. (2014).Bioethanol Production from SugarCane Bagasse by a Novel Brazillian Pentose Fermenting Yeast, Scheffersomyces shehatae UFMG-HM 52.2: Evaluation of Fermentation Medium. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2014:8..
[5]  Morimura, S., Ling, Z. Y., and Kida, K. (1997). Ethanol production by repeated batch fermentation at high temperature in a molasses medium containing a high concentration of total sugar by thermotolerant flocculating yeast with improved salt tolerance. J Ferment Bioeng 83: 271-74.
[6]  Agrawal, P. K., Kumar, S, and Kumar, S (1998). Studies on alcohol production from sugarcane juice, sugarcane molasses, sugarbeet juice and sugarbeet molasses, Saccharomyces cerevisiae NSI-113. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologists Association of India, Shimla, India.
[7]  El- Diwany, A I, El-Abyad, M. S. and EL-Rafai, A. H, Sallam, L. A. and Allam, R. P. (1992). Effect of some fermentation parameters on ethanol production from beet molasses by Saccahromyces cerevisiae Y-7. Biores Technol 42: 191.
[8]  Bulawayo, B, Brochora, J. M., Munzondo, M. I .and Zvauya, R. (1996). Ethanol production by fermentation of sweet sorghum juice using various yeast strains. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 12: 357-60.
[9]  Sree, N. K., Sridhar, M., Suresh, K., Bharat, I. M., and Rao, L. V. (2000). High alcohol production by repeated batch fermentation using immobilized osmotolerant S.cerevisiae. J Indust Microbiol Biotechnol 24: 222-26.
[10]  Beall, D. S., Bassat, L. O, Doran, A. B., Fowler, D .E., Hall, R. G., and Wood, B. E. (1992). Conversion of hydrolysate of corn cobs and hulls into ethanol by recombinant E.coli B containing integrated genes for ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett 14: 857.
[11]  Arni, S., Molinari., M, Borghi. M., Converti, A. (1999). Improvement of alcohol fermentation of a corn starch hydrolysate by viscosity raising additives. Starch Starke 218-24.
[12]  Othman, A. S., Othaman. M. N., Abdulrahim, A. R. and Bapar, S. A. (1992). Cocoa, Pineapples, Sugarcane Waste for ethanol production. Planter 68: 125.
[13]  Silva, C. A., Castro-Gomez, R. J. H., Abercio-da-Silva, C., and Gomez, R. J. H. C. (1995). Study of the fermentation process using milk whey and the yeast Kluyveromyces fragilis, Semina londrina 16: 17-21.
[14]  Ghalay, A. E. and Ben-Hassan, R. M. (1995). Kinetics of batch production of single cell protein from cheese whey. Appl Biochem Biotechnol - Part A, Enz Engin Biotechnol 50: 79-92. molasses by flocculating yeast for use as a alternative energy source.
[15]  Dabas, R., Verma, V. K., and Chauhary, K. (1997). Ethanol production from wheat starch. Indian J Microbiol vol 37: 49-50.
[16]  Sharma, S., and Tauro, P. (1986). Control of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of national symposium on yeast biotechnology held at Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
[17]  Yadav, A., Dilbaghi, N., and Sharma, S. (1997). Pretreatment of sugarcane molasses for ethanol production by yeast. Indian j. of Microbiol 37: 37-40.
[18]  Ok, T. and Hashinaga, F. (1997). Identification of sugar tolerant yeasts isolated from high sugar fermented vegetables extracts. J Gen Appl Microbiol 43: 39-47.
[19]  Skotnicki, M. L., Lee, K. J., Tribe, D. E and Rogers, P. L. (1981). Comparison of ethanol production by different Zymomonas strains. Applied and Environmental. Microbiol 889-893.
[20]  Bansal, R, and Singh, R. S. (2003). A comparative study on ethanol production from molasses using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis. Indian J. Microbiol 43:261-64.
[21]  Uma, V. and Polasa, H. (1990). S.cerevisiae of palm wine enhanced ethanol production by using mutagens. J Indust Microbiol Biotechnol 5: 1-4.
[22]  Bertolini, M. C., Ernandes, J. R. and Laluce, C. (1991)New yeast strains for alcoholic fermentation at higher sugar concentration. Biotechnol Lett 13: 197-202.
[23]  Nwoye, C. I., Odo, J. U., Chukwudi, B. C., and Asuke, F.(2011).Empirical Model for Assessment Evaluation and Optimization of Ethanol Production during Microbial Treatment of Sugar Cane Molasses. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Metallurgical Engineering, Abuja, Nigeria. Oct., 26-29.
[24]  Nwoye, C. I., Odo, J. U., Onyedika, G. O., and Ugwuegbu, C. C. (2011). Model for Predictive Analysis and Optimization of Bio-Fuel Production during Bio-treatment of Sugar Cane Molasses. Proceedings of the 3rd FUTO International Conference on Renewable and Alternative Energy and 2nd Annual Conference of the Renewable Energy and Alternative Energy Society of Nigeria, FUTO Owerri, Nigeria. Aug., 7-11.
[25]  Nwoye, C. I., Odo, J. U., Chukwudi, B. C., and Mbah, C. N. (2011). Model for Analysis and Prediction of Ethanol Production Based on Treatment Temperature and Microbial Growth during Biodegradation of Sugar Cane Molasses Combined Proceedings of the Nigerian Materials Congress and Meeting of the Nigerian Materials Research Society, Akure, Nigeria, Nov., 21-24.
[26]  Nwoye, C. I., (2008). Data Analytical Memory; C-NIKBRAN.
[27]  Nwoye, C. I., and Nwabanne J. T. (2013). Empirical Analysis of Methane Gas Yield Dependence on Organic Loading Rate during Microbial Treatment of Fruit Wastes in Digester. Advances in Applied Science Research 4(1): 308-318.