An Analytic Method to Study the Comparative Efficiency of Different Software Model

Jimmy Soni^1, and Sanjay Agal^2,

¹Rajasthan Technical University, Kota 03-PA-38, Prabhat Nagar, Sect-05, Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

²Rajasthan Technical University, Kota 15-j, Road No 13, Shakti Nagar, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Cite this paper:
Jimmy Soni and Sanjay Agal. An Analytic Method to Study the Comparative Efficiency of Different Software Model. American Journal of Software Engineering. 2017; 5(1):16-19. doi: 10.12691/ajse-5-1-2

Abstract

The challenge that all organizations confront in a rapidly changing business condition is to remain competitive with a specific end goal to hold and the off chance that conceivable grow their piece of the pie. To acquire the most productivity, the use of minimum aid is the purpose of any software industry. Software engineering presents an abstraction procedure to develop software program product. It has introduced various methodologies, principles and ideas. Most of them are the software program technique models that are also known as software program lifestyles cycle fashions. In the software industry, extraordinary types of tasks (small, medium, big, complicated) arrive in random inter arrival time for the improvement of software products. On the simple of take a look at of the tasks performed through Acnosys Software Private Limited, earlier than enforcing the goods, task managers decide the precise software technique model in documentation which is used in manufacturing of merchandise. An empirical has a look at performed in 2012 that offers diverse effecting factors for choosing any software life cycle version. One of the essential elements among them is group length. Software enterprise has a development team which goes in co-ordination and depends on each other. Every now and then project managers aren't intelligently assigned assets to precise phases of software program life cycle model. Consequently, to triumph over these issues we're simulating iterative waterfall and incremental version to determine ideal resources for each section of software existence cycle model. This observes shall permit the project supervisor to decide most appropriate resource without imposing software product. We have used Process simulator to provide base to our proposed model provided by Microsoft.

Keywords:
SDLC model software engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Nabil Mohammed Ali Munassar and A. Govardhan, “A Comparison Between Five Models Of software Engineering” IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol 7, Issue 5, Sep, 2010.
[2]	Pratap K.J Mohapatra “Software Engineering: Life cycle Approach”, 1th ed., NAIL, 2010.
[3]	Ian sommervilla, Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 9th ed, 2010.
[4]	Roger S. Pressman, “Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach”, 5th ed., TMH, 2001.
[5]	Stephen R. Schach, “Object oriented software engineering”, 1th ed, THM, 2008.
[6]	Steve Easterbrook, “software life cycle”, university of Toronto, Department of computer science, 2001.
[7]	Royce W., “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems”, Proceedings of IEEEWESCON 26, pp.1-9, 1970.
[8]	IEEE-STD-610, “A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries”, IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary, 1991.
[9]	CTG.MFA-003, “A survey of System Development Process Models”, Models for action projects: Developing and preservation, center for technology in Government University at Albany/Suny, 1998.
[10]	Jim Ledin, “Simulation Planning” PE, Ledin Engineering, 2000.
[11]	Craig Larman and Victor Basili, “Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History”, IEEE Computer, 2003.
[12]	CTG.MFA-003, “A Survey of System Development Process Model”, Models for Action Project: Developing Practical Approaches to Electronic Records Management and Preservation, Center for Technology in Government University at Albany/Suny, 1998.
[13]	Steve Easterbrook, “Software Lifecycle”, University of Toronto Department of Computer Science, 2001.
[14]	Christian Walck “Handbook on statistical distribution” university of stockholem, 2007.
[15]	Balci O, “Guidelines for Successful Simulation Studies”, Proceeding of Simulation Conference Pp.25-32, New Orleans, LA, 1990.
[16]	Caroln Mizell, Linda Malone, “A Software Development Simulation Model of a Spiral Process”. Available: Carolyn. A.Mizell@nasa.gov.
[17]	Rupa Mahanti, M.S. Neogi and Vandana Bhattacherjee, “Factors Affecting the Choice of Software Life Cycle Models in the Software Industry-An Empirical Study”, Journal of Computer Science: 1253-1262, © 2012 Science Publications.
[18]	Extreme Chaos (2001), Standish Group. Available: http:// standishgroup.com/sample_research/extreme_chaos.pdf.
[19]	Youssef Bassil, “A Simulation Model for the Waterfall Software Development Life Cycle”, International Journal of Engineering &Technology, Vol.2, No.5, 2012.
[20]	B. Boehm and K.J Sullivan, “Software Economics. Status and Prospects,” Special Millennium Issue, Information and Software Technology, 2000.
[21]	Leung H. and Fan Z., Software Cost Estimation. Handbook of Software Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University 2002.
[22]	Reuevn R. Levary, Chi Y. Lin, “Modeling the Software Development process using an Expert Simulation System Having Fuzzy Logic”, Journal of Software Practice and Experience, vol. 21, no 2, pp.133-148, 1991.
[23]	www.ibirdsservices.com
[24]	Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Available [online]: www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26.
[25]	Simphony.NET 4.6(2005), University of Alberta, [online]. Available:http://ircconstruction.ualberta.ca/htl/research/software/simphony.net.html.