American Journal of Rural Development
ISSN (Print): 2333-4762 ISSN (Online): 2333-4770 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajrd Editor-in-chief: Chi-Ming Lai
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Rural Development. 2016, 4(3), 59-64
DOI: 10.12691/ajrd-4-3-1
Open AccessArticle

Corruption-Related Factors Limiting the Success of Community and Social Development Projects (CSDP) in Imo State, Nigeria

Okereke-Ejiogu E.N.1, Asiabaka C.C.2 and Umunakwe P.C.1,

1Department of Agricultural Extension, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 1526, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria

2Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development Studies, Imo State University Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria

Pub. Date: July 27, 2016

Cite this paper:
Okereke-Ejiogu E.N., Asiabaka C.C. and Umunakwe P.C.. Corruption-Related Factors Limiting the Success of Community and Social Development Projects (CSDP) in Imo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Rural Development. 2016; 4(3):59-64. doi: 10.12691/ajrd-4-3-1

Abstract

The study analyzed corruption-related factors limiting the effectiveness of Community and Social Development Projects (CSDP) in Imo State, Nigeria. Specifically, it determined the people’s participation in the projects, assessed their perceived effectiveness of the projects, and identified corruption-related constraints to the success of the projects in the study area. Multistage sampling technique was used to select a sample of 216 respondents. A set of structured questionnaire was used to elicit data from the respondents. Data were analyzed using percentages and mean. Results show that effective projects were water borehole (88.4%), drainage systems (88.4%), solid waste management (86.6%) and construction of health centres (86.6%). The result further revealed that theft (90.0%), untimely release of counterpart fund (80.8%), embezzlement of funds by government officials (79.9%), diversion of project equipment (78.0%) and bloating of project cost (78.2%) were the major constraints to CSDP in the study area. The use of participatory approaches in the running of the projects, proper need assessment and strict monitoring and evaluation of projects were recommended for the effectiveness of the project in the study area.

Keywords:
community and social development project constraints effectiveness Nigeria

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Dike, V.E. (2005). Corruption in Nigeria: a new paradigm for effective control. African Economic Analysis. Retrieved online on 24th December, 2015 from http://www.africaneconomicanalysis.org.
 
[2]  Eboh, F.E. & Uma, K.E. (2013). Corruption, economic development and emerging markets: evidence from Nigeria. Asian Journal of Management Science and Education, 2(3): 56-67.
 
[3]  Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). (2005). Effect of corruption on Nigeria’s economy. EFCC Information and Communication Technology Department, Abuja.
 
[4]  Ekong, E.E. (2011). Introduction to rural sociology. Uyo: Dove Publishers.
 
[5]  Gyimah-Brempong, K. (2002). Corruption, economic growth and income inequality in Africa. Economics of Governance 3.
 
[6]  Ike, D.N. (2009). Corruption and its impacts on the economic development of Nigeria. Public Lecture delivered at Covenant University Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria, 17th April.
 
[7]  Independent and Corrupt practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) (). Nigerian and corruption.
 
[8]  Lawal, G. (2007). Corruption and development in Africa: challenges for development and economic change. Humanity and Social Science Journals, 2(1), 01-07.
 
[9]  Mo, P.H. (2000). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 29. Retrieved online on 24th December, 2015 from http://www.idealibrary.com.
 
[10]  Mutongu, Z.B. (n.d.). Women’s participation in community-based organizations development as a strategy for poverty eradication in Kenya. Paper for the Journal of Constructive Theology.
 
[11]  National Population Commission, NPC. (2006). Nigerian population census report 2006.
 
[12]  Nekwaya, J.H. (2007). Assessing community participation in in development planning and service delivery. A case study of Omusati Regional Council. A Master’s thesis of the Department of Sustainable Development and Management, University of Stellenbosch. Retrieved online on 14th December, 2016 from http://ed.sun.ac.za/bitstream/10019/690/1/Nekwaya%2C%20J.H.pdf/June.
 
[13]  Ngugi, D., Mukundu, D., Epperson, J. & Achaempong, Y. (2003). Determinants of household participation in rural development project. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Mobile, Alabama, February 1-3.
 
[14]  Obayelu, A.E. (2007). Effects of corruption and reforms on economic growth and development: lessons from Nigeria. Paper submitted for African Economic Conference.
 
[15]  Ogbulie, N. (2013). Why Nigerians are corrupt. Business World, Monday 6. Retrieved online on 1st January, 2016 from http://www.businessworld.ng.com/web/articles/3017/1/why-Nigerians-are-corrupt/page1.html.
 
[16]  Osuagwu, A.E. (2008). Conceptualizing corruption in business organizations: nature, causes, consequences, remedies and research directions.
 
[17]  Rao, A, Staurt, R. & Kelleher, D. (1999). Gender at work: organizational change for equality. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
 
[18]  Thangata, P.H., Hunderbradt, P.E. & Gladwin, C.H. (2002). Modelling agroforestry adoption and household decision making in Malawi. African Studies Quarterly 6. No. 1 &2.
 
[19]  Theron, F. (2005). Public participation as a micro-level development strategy. In: D.F. Theron & K.J. Maphuryne (Eds.), Participatory development in South Africa: a development management perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
 
[20]  Transparency International (2011). Corruption perception index. Retrieved online on 1oth December, 2015 from http://www.tranparency.org/cpi2011/results.
 
[21]  United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2015). Work for human development. Briefing note for countries on the 2015 human development report.