American Journal of Public Health Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-669X ISSN (Online): 2327-6703 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajphr Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Public Health Research. 2018, 6(6), 237-242
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-6-6-1
Open AccessArticle

Proportion of Disrespectful and Abusive Care during Childbirth among Women in Khartoum State-2016

Awatif Altahir1, , Asma Abd Alaal1, Amal Mohammed1 and Dalya Eltayeb2

1Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, al-qasr road, Khartoum, Sudan

2Maternal and Child Health Directorate-PHC General Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Nile Street, Khartoum, Sudan

Pub. Date: November 28, 2018

Cite this paper:
Awatif Altahir, Asma Abd Alaal, Amal Mohammed and Dalya Eltayeb. Proportion of Disrespectful and Abusive Care during Childbirth among Women in Khartoum State-2016. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2018; 6(6):237-242. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-6-6-1

Abstract

The access to good quality hospital care during childbirth has been identified as a key strategy in increasing maternal and infant survival. In spite of that, home delivery was 79.5% according to the Sudan 2010 Household Survey. Previous evidence tells that one of the major factors deterring pregnant women from delivering at a health facility is disrespectful and abusive treatment by the health care providers. This study attempted to measure the proportion of disrespectful and abusive care (D&A) during childbirth among women in Khartoum state in 2016 and to determine the types of D&A within selected health facilities. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in three hospitals in Khartoum State, Sudan. The distribution of the sample to health facilities was made proportionately based on the number of clients who received childbirth services at each facility. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, 263 mothers were interviewed in which the disrespect and abuse during childbirth was measured under seven categories using 15 performance indicators that were pre-set by Bowser & Hill’s landscape analysis. Respondents who experienced at least one category of D&A were 77.2%. The proportion of women who had a low, medium and high level of D&A was 39.3%, 32.3% and 5.6% respectively. The most common categories of D&A were found to be Non-confidential care (79.8%), Non-consented care (71.5%) & Abandonment of care (21.7%). The proportion of D&A during childbirth is very high, these findings should alert all stakeholders who aim at reducing maternal mortality. Presence of protocols that regulate respectful and non-abusive care was identified but these results raise the question of adherence to protocols; therefore, health administrators should study and validate these protocols and their proper implementation.

Keywords:
disrespect abuse childbirth Sudan Khartoum

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Koblinsky M, Chowdhury ME, Moran A, Ronsmans C. Maternal morbidity and disability and their consequences: Neglected agenda in maternal health. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2012; 30 (2): 124-30.
 
[2]  World Health Organization. Maternal mortality in 2000: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2004, 30p. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42930.
 
[3]  MoH & CBS. Sudan Household Health Survey by National Ministry of Health and Central Bureau of Statistics [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/MICS4-Sudan-2010.pdf.
 
[4]  Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth Report of a Landscape Analysis. 2010; 1-57. Available from: http://www.urc-chs.com/uploads/resourceFiles/Live/Respectful CareatBirth9-20-101Final.pdf.
 
[5]  Kruk ME, Paczkowski MM TA et al. Women’s preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010; 64(11); 984-988.
 
[6]  Wagner M. Fish can’ t see water : the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2001; 25-37. Available from: https://www.birthinternational.com/articles/birth/18-fish-cant-see-water.
 
[7]  Umbeli T, Kunna A, Ismail S, Mirghani sulman M, O MI. Why women choose to deliver at home in Omdurman, Sudan 2013. Merit Res J. 2014; 2(8): 174-178.
 
[8]  Human Rights, Accountability , and Maternal Death in Nigeria The Center for Reproductive Rights [Internet]. New york; 2008. 87 p. Available from: https://www.reproductiverights.org/document/broken-promises-human-rights-accountability-and-maternal-death-in-nigeria.
 
[9]  Phillips, Araya, Sepúlveda. Violations of the Rights of HIV-Positive Women in Chilean Health Facilities [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.reproductiverights.org/feature/dignity-denied-violations-of-the-rights-of-hiv-positive-women-in-chilean-health-facilities.
 
[10]  Kruk ME, Paczkowski M, Mbaruku G, De Pinho H, Galea S. Women’s preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: A population-based discrete choice experiment. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(9): 1666-72.
 
[11]  A High Price to Pay. Detention of Poor Patients in Burundian Hospitals [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/report/2006/09/07/high-price-pay/detention-poor-patients-burundian-hospitals.
 
[12]  WRA. Respectful Maternity Care: the universal rights of childbearing women. 2012; 1-6. Available from: http://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/WRA/assets/File/Final-RMC-Charter.pdf%3E.Retrieved.
 
[13]  Mohammed Kl, Alaf- KK, Mohammed Al, Gamble J, Creedy D. Jordanian woman's dissatisfaction with childbirth care-int. Nurse Rev. 2014; 61(2) 278: 84.
 
[14]  Center for Reproductive Rights, Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya. Failure to Deliver: Violations of Women’s Human Rights in Kenyan Health Facilities. United states; 2007. 105 p.
 
[15]  Human Rights Watch, Unaccountable: Addressing Reproductive Health Care Gaps, New York; 2010. 14 p. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/wrd0510webwcover.pdf.
 
[16]  Fonn S, Xaba M. Health Workers for Change: developing the initiative. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2001; 16: 13-8.