American Journal of Public Health Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-669X ISSN (Online): 2327-6703 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015, 3(4A), 45-48
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-3-4A-9
Open AccessResearch Article

A Prospective Study on Impact of Non Stress Test in Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome

Pravin Shrestha1, , Mehak Misha1 and Smita Shrestha1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal

Pub. Date: June 26, 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maternal and Child Health)

Cite this paper:
Pravin Shrestha, Mehak Misha and Smita Shrestha. A Prospective Study on Impact of Non Stress Test in Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015; 3(4A):45-48. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-3-4A-9


This prospective study was done at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal to identify effectiveness of NST in detecting high risk fetus thus preventing perinatal morbidity and mortality. The cohort of 125 pregnant mothers from 37 completed weeks to 42 weeks irrespective of risk factors, were subjected to NST for 20 minutes and extended to 40 minutes to avoid fetal sleep cycle. NST was categorized into Cat I, II and III according to NICHD. Fetal distress, meconium stained liquor was higher in Cat III group. There was more intervention in Cat II and Cat III group. Total number of patients who underwent LSCS was 51. Most common indication for LSCS (53%) was for fetal distress out of which 85% had NST of Cat II (37%) and Cat III (48%). For detecting high risk fetus, NST is a simple screening procedure and is helpful in decreasing perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Non Stress Test (NST) Perinatal Morbidity Perinatal Mortality

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 145: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance, July 2014. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 182-92.
[2]  Cunningham FG, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong C, Dashe J (2014). Williams Obstetrics 24th edition, The McGraw-Hill companies. 2014; 551-556.
[3]  Sathian B, Sreedharan J, Baboo NS, Sharan K, Abhilash ES, Rajesh E. Relevance of Sample Size Determination in Medical Research. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 1 (1): 4-10.
[4]  Sathian B. Methodological Rigors in the Medical Journals from Developing Countries: Asian Scenario. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 1 (5): 141-43.
[5]  Gurung G, Rana A, Giri K. Detection of intrapartum fetal hypoxia using admission test. N.J Obstet. Gynaecol Vol. 1, No. 2, p 10-13 Nov-Dec 2006.
[6]  Patel S, Gupta S, Modi K, Desai A, Shaha S and Pamnani D. Correlation of admission NST in Low risk Pregnancy with Neonatal outcome. American journal of Ethnomedicine, 2015, Vol 2, No 2.
[7]  Verma A, Shrimali L. Impact of admission Non stress test as a screening procedure on perinatal outcome. International Journal of science and research, 2012; 3(5); 6-10.
[8]  Bhide AA, Bhattacharya MS. Predictive value of nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome. J Postgrad Med. 1990; 36 (2): 104-105.
[9]  Hafizur R, Renjhen P, Dutta S, Kar S. Admission cardiotocography: Its role in predicting foetal outcome in high-risk obstetric patients. AMJ 2012, 5, 10, 522-527.
[10]  Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaron S, Ingemarsson E, Tambiraja RJ, Ratnam SS. Admission Test: A screening test for distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 800-6.
[11]  Kulkarni AA, Shroti AN. Admission Test: Apredictive test for distress in high risk labor. JObstet Gynecol Res 1998; 24 (4): 255-9.
[12]  Bhat RA. Labour admission test: A screening tool. Obs & Gynae Today 2006; 9 (6): 328-31.
[13]  Phelan JP. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan; 139 (1): 7-10.
[14]  Lohana R U, Khatri M, Hariharan C. Correlation of nonstress test with foetal outcome in term pregnancy (37-42 weeks). Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 2 (4); 639-645.
[15]  Eden RD, Siefert LS, Koack LD, et al. A modified biophysical profile for ante natal fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:365-39.
[16]  Bano I, Noor N, Motwani L, Arshad Z. Comparative study of Non stress test and Foetal acoustic stimulation of assessment of foetal well being.
[17]  Lawrence DD, Morrison J, Meartin J Jr., Palmer S, Martin R, Searle N et al. Non stress testing and ontraindication stress testing. OGCNA. 1999; 535-556.