American Journal of Nursing Research
ISSN (Print): 2378-5594 ISSN (Online): 2378-5586 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajnr Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Nursing Research. 2019, 7(3), 310-315
DOI: 10.12691/ajnr-7-3-11
Open AccessArticle

Exploring the Experiences of Nursing Students during Debriefing: A Qualitative Study

Wafaa Elarousy1, 2, , Jennifer de Beer1 and Hend Alnajjar1

1College of Nursing, Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, KSA

2Pediatric Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Egypt

Pub. Date: March 23, 2019

Cite this paper:
Wafaa Elarousy, Jennifer de Beer and Hend Alnajjar. Exploring the Experiences of Nursing Students during Debriefing: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2019; 7(3):310-315. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-7-3-11

Abstract

Background: Debriefing is a process involving the active participation of learners, guided by a facilitator or instructor whose primary goal is to identify and close gaps in knowledge and skills. It promotes understanding and supports transfer of knowledge, skills and attitudes with the focus on safe and high quality patient care. Hence, the aim of the study was to explore the experiences of nursing students during debriefing. Methodology: The study was conducted at the College of Nursing – Jeddah, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. A qualitative research design was used which included convenient sampling of nursing students who were enrolled in clinical courses. Four focus groups were conducted until saturation was reached. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and data analysis followed a content analysis approach. Results: Three main themes emerged: facilitators, barriers and the way forward. The participants within this study highlighted that learning from shared experiences of colleagues was a factor that promoted a positive attitude towards debriefing. Long clinical days was the most prominent barrier to debriefing with debriefing sessions focusing on the same content that was discussed in the clinical area was identified as the next barrier. Hence nothing new was added in order to promote learning during debriefing. Conclusion: This study affirmed many of the common, frequently cited advantages and disadvantages of the debriefing process. There is certainly an opportunity for the process to be improved by using evidence-based methods that will achieve the same or better results.

Keywords:
debriefing qualitative study student nurses

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Raemer D., (2011). Research Regarding Debriefing as Part of the Learning Process. Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 6(7): PAGE NUMBERS.
 
[2]  Pivec J., Renee C., (2011). "Debriefing after Simulation: Guidelines for Faculty and Students". Master of Arts in Nursing Theses. http://sophia.stkate.edu/ma_nursing accessed Feb. 2016.
 
[3]  Decker, S., Fey, M., Sideras, S., Caballero, S., Rockstraw, L. , Boese, T., Franklin, A. E., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., Sando, C. R., Meakim, C., &Borum, J. C. (2013). Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard VI: The debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6S): S27-S29.
 
[4]  Arafeh, J., Hansen, S., Nichols A. (2010). Debriefing in Simulated-Based Learning: Facilitating a Reflective Discussion. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 24(4): 302–309.
 
[5]  Baldwin, K. (2007). Friday night in the pediatric emergency department: A simulated exercise to promote clinical reasoning in the classroom. Nurse Educator, 32(1), 24-29.
 
[6]  Fanning., R. & Gaba D. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Society for Simulation in Health Care, 2(2): 115-125.
 
[7]  Overstreet, M. (2009). "The Current Practice of Nursing Clinical Simulation Debriefing: A Multiple Case Study." PhD diss., University of Tennessee, http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/627 accessed Feb., 2016.
 
[8]  Cant R. Cooper S. (2011). The benefits of debriefing as a formative feedback in nurse education, Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1): 37-47.
 
[9]  Salas E., Wilson K., Burke S., Priest H., (2005). Use simulation-based training to improve patient safety: what does it take? Commission Journal on Quality & patient Safety, 31(7): 363-71.
 
[10]  Mangone N., King J., Croft T., Church J. (2005). Debriefing: An approach to psychosocial support for new graduate Registered Nurses and Trainee Enrolled Nurses. Contemporary Nurse, 20(2): 248-257.
 
[11]  Rudolph J., Simon R., Rivard P., Dufresne R., Raemer D. Debriefing with Good Judgment: Combining Rigorous Feedback with Genuine Inquiry. Anesthesiology Clin, 25 (2007): 361-376.
 
[12]  Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning. New Jersey; Prentice Hall.
 
[13]  Cantrell, M. (2008). The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 4(2): e19-e23.
 
[14]  Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research, London, Sage.
 
[15]  Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
 
[16]  Polit, D. & Beck, C. 2012. Nursing research principle and methods, Philadelphia, Lippincott.
 
[17]  Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park, California, Sage.
 
[18]  Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
 
[19]  Björkström, M., Athlin, E. and Johansson, I. (2008). Nurses’ development of professional self – from being a nursing student in a baccalaureate programme to an experienced nurse. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(10):1380-1391.
 
[20]  Öhlén, J., Berg, L., BjörkBrämberg, E., Engström, Å., German Millberg, L., Höglund, I., Jacobsson, C., Lepp, M., Lidén, E., Lindström, I., Petzäll, K., Söderberg, S. and Wijk, H. (2011). Students’ learning as the focus for shared involvement between universities and clinical practice: a didactic model for postgraduate degree projects. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(4): 471-487.
 
[21]  Dzioba, J., Cant, R., Cooper, S., Bogossian, F. and Phillips, N. (2014). Barriers and enablers to learning during team-based clinical simulations: Reflective interviews with final year undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4(10): 32-39.
 
[22]  Tutticci, N., Ryan, M., Coyer, F. and Lewis, P. (2017). Collaborative facilitation of debrief after high-fidelity simulation and its implications for reflective thinking: student experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 1-14.
 
[23]  Johnston, S., Coyer, F. and Nash, R. (2017). Simulation debriefing based on principles of transfer of learning: A pilot study. Nurse Education in Practice, 102-108.
 
[24]  Gibbons, C. (2010). Stress, coping and burn-out in nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(10): 1299-1309.
 
[25]  Watson, R., Deary, I., Thompson, D. and Li, G. (2008). A study of stress and burnout in nursing students in Hong Kong: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(10): 1534-1542.
 
[26]  Healy, S. and Tyrrell, M. (2013). Importance of debriefing following critical incidents. Emergency Nurse, 20(10): 32-37.
 
[27]  Magyar, J. and Theophilos, T. (2010). Review article: Debriefing critical incidents in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 22(6):499-506.
 
[28]  Nocera, M. and Merritt, C. (2017). Pediatric Critical Event Debriefing in Emergency Medicine Training: An Opportunity for Educational Improvement. AEM Education and Training, 1(3): 208-214.
 
[29]  RoshanEssani, R. and Ali, T. (2011). Knowledge and Practice Gaps among Pediatric Nurses at a Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi Pakistan. ISRN Pediatrics, 2011: 1-8.