Journals A-Z
All Subjects
Free Journals
sciepub.com
American Journal of Materials Science and Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2333-4665 ISSN (Online): 2333-4673 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajmse Editor-in-chief: Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Issue 3, Volume 2
Article Metrics
  • 32088
    Views
  • 22723
    Saves
  • 5
    Citations
  • 84
    Likes
Export Article
American Journal of Materials Science and Engineering. 2014, 2(3), 28-35
DOI: 10.12691/ajmse-2-3-1
Open AccessReview Article

A Review of Conventional and Contemporary Luting Agents Used in Dentistry

Sita Ramaraju DV1, Rama Krishna Alla2, , Venkata Ramaraju Alluri3 and Raju MAKV4

1Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India

2Department of Dental Materials, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India

3Department of Prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India

4Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India

Pub. Date: August 15, 2014
View Full Text Full Text PDF Full Text ePUB

Cite this paper:
Sita Ramaraju DV, Rama Krishna Alla, Venkata Ramaraju Alluri and Raju MAKV. A Review of Conventional and Contemporary Luting Agents Used in Dentistry. American Journal of Materials Science and Engineering. 2014; 2(3):28-35. doi: 10.12691/ajmse-2-3-1

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate luting agent influences the long-term clinical success of fixed prosthodontic restorations. There are varieties of luting agents available from conventional water-based to contemporary adhesive resin cements. However, no single luting agent is capable of meeting all the stringent requirements. Introduction of adhesive resin systems has completely changed the face of fixed prosthodontic practice leading to an increased use of bonded all-ceramic crowns and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. This review aims at presenting an overview of current cements and discusses physical properties, biocompatibility and other properties that make particular cement the preferred choice depending on the clinical indication.

Keywords:
dental luting agents cements biocompatibility film thickness adhesion

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Anusavice KJ, Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials, WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 2003, 11th Edition, 443-493.
 
[2]  Rama Krishna Alla, Dental Materials Science, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt Limited, New Delhi, India, 2013, 1st Edition, 91-125.
 
[3]  Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, Elsevier, Mosby, Philadelphia, 2011, 12th Edition, 327-348.
 
[4]  J’Obrien W, Dental Materials and their selection, 3rd edition, quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, 2002, 132-155.
 
[5]  Ladha K, Verma M, Conventional and Contemporary Luting Cements: An Overview, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 10(2), 79-88, June 2010.
 
[6]  Pameijer CH, A Review of luting agents, Oral Health Group, 1-11, Nov 2013 (http://www.oralhealthgroup.com/news/a-review-of-luting-agents-cornelis-h-pameijer-dmd-dsc-phd/1002702355/?&er=NA).
 
[7]  de la Macorra JC, Pradíes G, Conventional and adhesive luting cements, Clin Oral Invest,6:198-204, Nov 2002.
 
[8]  Jivraj SA, Kim TH, Donovan TE. Selection of luting agents, part 1. J Calif Dent Assoc, 34(2):149-160, Feb 2006.
 
[9]  Kim TH, Jivraj SA, Donovan TE. Selection of luting Agents, part 2. J Calif Dent Assoc,34(2):161-166, Feb 2006.
 
[10]  Smith DC, A new dental cement. Br. Dent. J, 124(9), 381-4, Nov 1968.
 
[11]  Wilson AD, Kent RE.: A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement, Br. Dent. J, 132(4), 133-135, Feb 1972.
 
[12]  Mesu FP, Degradation of luting cements measured in vitro, J. Dent. Res, 61(5), 665-72, May 1982.
 
[13]  Zhen Chun Li, White SN, Mechanical properties of dental luting cements, J Prosthet Dent, 81(5), 579-609, May 1999.
 
[14]  Mitchell CA, Douglas WH, Comparison of the porosity of hand mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements, Biomater, 18, 1127-1131, Aug 1997.
 
[15]  Oilo G, Luting cements: A review and comparison. Int. Dent. J, 41, 81-8, Apr 1991.
 
[16]  Gattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM, Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass Ionomer cements, Dent Mater, 159(1), 71-78, Jan 1999.
 
[17]  Gattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM, Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water, Dent. Mater, 10, 37-44, 1994.
 
[18]  McCabe JF, Angus W.G. Walls, Applied Dental Materials, Blackwell publishing company, UK, 1998 8th Edition, 245 -264.
 
[19]  Combe EC. Notes on dental materials, Longman Group Limited, 1986 5th edition.
 
[20]  Ebru SÜMER, Yalçın DEĞER, Contemporary Permanent Luting Agents used in Dentistry: A Literature Review, Int Dent Res, 1(1), 26-31, 2011.
 
[21]  Ferrance JF, Materials in Dentistry: Principles and Applications. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2nd edition, 2001, 59-116.
 
[22]  Russell D, ZNP red copper cement. Materia Medica, 1-3, 2001.
 
[23]  Overman PR, Biofilm: A new view of plaque. J Contemp Dent Pract, 1(3), 18-29, Aug 2000.
 
[24]  Upadhya NP, Kishore G, Glass Ionomer Cement – The Different Generations, Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs, 18 (2), 158-165, Jan 2005.
 
[25]  Croll TP, Berg JH, Glass Ionomer cement systems, Inside Dent, 6(8), 82-84, 2010.
 
[26]  Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Clinical applications of glass ionomers in endodontics: a review, Int Dent J, 62: 244-250, Oct 2012.
 
[27]  Kendzoir GM, Leinfelder KF, Characteristics of zinc phosphate cements mixed at sub-zero temperatures [Abstract no.134], J Dent Res, 55(Special Issue B), B95, 1976.
 
[28]  Myers CL, et al., A comparison of properties for zinc phosphate cements mixed on room temperature and frozen slabs, J Prosthet Dent, 40(4), 409-12, 1978.
 
[29]  Pameijer, A Review of luting agents, Int J Dent, 2012: 1-7. Article ID 752861.
 
[30]  Gosavi SS, Gosavi SY, Alla RK, Local and Systemic Effects of Unpolymerised Monomers, Dent Res J, 7(2), 82-87, Summer-Autumn 2010.
 
[31]  Rosensteil SF, et al., Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature, J Prosthet Dent, 80, 280, Sep 1998.
 
[32]  Bowen RL, Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations, J Am Dent Assoc, 66, 57-64, Jan 1963.
 
[33]  Ravi RK, Alla RK, Shammas M, Devarhubli A, Dental Composties – A Versatile Restorative material: An Overview, Ind J Dent Sci, 5(5), 111-115, Dec 2013.
 
[34]  Xu X, Burgess JO, Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials, Biomater, 24(14), 2451-61, June 2003.
 
[35]  Mc Comb D, Adhesive luting cements - classes, criteria, and usage, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 17(8), 759-62, Aug 1996.
 
[36]  Robertello FJ, Coffey JP, Lynde TA, King P, Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro, J Prosthet Dent,82(2), 172-6, Aug1999.
 
[37]  Rosensteil SF, Rashid RG, Post cementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions, J Prosthodont, 12(2), 73-81, Jun 2003.
 
[38]  Tjan AHL, Tao L, Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement, J Prosthet Dent, 67(4), 478-483, Apr 1992.
 
[39]  Griffith JR, Cannon RWS, Cementation—materials and techniques, Aust Dent J, 19(2), 93-99, Apr 1974.
 
[40]  Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML, Direct surface pH determination of setting cements, Oper Dent, 16(6), 231-238, Nov-Dec 1991.
 
[41]  Swift EJ, Lloyd AH, Felton DA, The effect of resin desensitizing agents on crown retention, J Am Dent Assoc,128(2), 195-200, Feb 1997.
 
[42]  Smith DC, Ruse ND, Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity, J Am Dent Assoc, 112(5), 654-657, May 1986.
 
[43]  Johnson GH, Powell LV, Derouen TA, Evaluation and control of postcementation pulpal sensitivity of Zinc phosphate and glass-ionomer cements, J Am Dent Assoc, 124(11), 39-46, Nov 1993.
 
[44]  Attar N, Onen A, Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of esthetic restorative materials, J Oral Rehabil, 29(8), 791-8, Aug 2002.
 
[45]  Bell A, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Saunders WP, The effect of saliva on fluoride release by a glass-ionomer filling material, J Oral Rehabil, 26(5), 407-12, May 1999.
 
[46]  De Moor RJ, VerBeeck RM, DE Maeyer EA, Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass-ionomer formulations, Dent Mater, 12(2), 88-95, Mar 1996.
 
[47]  Dhull KS, Nandlal B, Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from PRG-composites and compomer on application of topical fluoride: An in-vitro study, J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent, 27(1), 27-32, Jan-Mar 2009.
 
[48]  Setty JV, Singh S, Subba Reddy VV, Comparision of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional Glass Ionomers and Polyacid modified Composite resins- An in-vitro study, J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent, 21(2), 55-69, Jun 2003.
 
[49]  Preston AJ, Mair LH, Agalamanyi EA, Highham SM, Fluoride release from aesthetic dental materials, J Oral Rehabil, 26(2), 123-129, Feb 1999.
 
[50]  Lee SY, Dong DR, Huang HM, Shih YH, Fluoride ion diffusion from glass ionomer cement, J Oral Rehabil, 27(7), 576-586, Jul 2000.
 
[51]  Kiran A, Hegde V, A short term comparative analysis of Fluoride release from a newly introduced Glass Ionomer Cement in deionised water and lactic acid, J Int Oral Health, 2(2), 71-77, Aug 2010.
 
[52]  Moreau JL, Xu HK, Fluoride releasing restorative materials: Effects of pH on mechanical properties and ion release, Dent Mater, 26(11), e227-e235, Nov 2010.
 
[53]  Pithon MM, Dos Santos RL, Oliveira MV, Ruellas AC, Romano FL, Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions, Angle Orthodont, 76(4), 700-4, Jul 2006.
 
[54]  Pereira TB, Jansen WC, Pithon MM, Souki BQ, Tanaka OM, Oliveira DD, Effects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Eur J Orthod,35(4), 442-6, Aug 2013.
 
[55]  Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Vreven J, Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements, compomers, and resin composites, J Oral Rehabil, 28, 26-32, Jan 2001.
 
[56]  Weigand A, Buchalla W, Attin T, Review of fluoride-relaesing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity, and influence on caries formation, Dent Mater, 23(3), 343-362, Mar 2007.
 
[57]  Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I, Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer, and giomer, Dent Res J, 6(2), 75-81, Autumn 2009.
 
[58]  Qvist V, Poulsen A, Teglers PT, Mjor IA, Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeh, Int Dent J, 60(3), 156-160, Jun 2010.
 
[59]  Patil S, Goud M, Sajjan, Effect of short-term Fluoride release from various restorative cements on enamel demineralization: A in vitro study, Int J Prostho Rest Dent, 1(1), 29-33, April-June 2011.
 
[60]  Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B, The biocompatibility of resin-modied glass-ionomer cements for dentistry, Dent Mater, 24(12), 1702-1708, Dec 2008.
 
[61]  Smith DC, Dental cements. Current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am, 6(3), 763-793, 1983.
 
[62]  Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ, Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature, J Prosthet Dent, 80(3), 280-301, Sep 1998.
 
[63]  Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC, Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives, Oper Dent, 31(5), 584-589, Sep-Oct2006.
 
[64]  Ravi RK, Alla RK, Shammas M, Ramesh KSV, Non-Carious lesions due to tooth surface loss: A Review, Dental Era – A Journal of Dentistry, 3(3), 35-40, Jul-Sept 2013.
 
[65]  Strutz JM, White SN, Yu Z, Kane CL, Luting cement metal surface physicochemical interactions on film thickness, J Prosthet Dent, 72(2), 128-132, Aug 1994.
 
[66]  Øilo G, Evje DM, Film thickness of dental luting cements, Dent Mater, 2(2), 85-89, Apr 1986.
 
[67]  Cho E, Kopel H, White SN, Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials, Quitessence Int, 269(5), 351-358, May 1995.
 
[68]  White SN, Yu Z, Film thickness of new adhesive luting agents, J Prosthet Dent, 67(6), 782-785, Jun 1992.
 
[69]  White SN, Yu Z, Sangsurasak S, In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements, J Prosthet Dent, 74(1), 25-32, Jul 1995.
 
[70]  Hosada H, Katsuyama S, Ishikawa T, Fujii B (eds) Glass ionomer dental cement-the materials and their clinical use. Ishiyaku Euroamerica, St Louis, 16-24, 40-46, 1993.
 
[71]  Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM, Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite, J Dent Res, 62(5), 590-592, May 1983.
 
[72]  Hajizadeh H, Ghavamnasiri M, Namazikhah MS, Majidinia S, Bagheri M, Effect of different conditioning protocols on the adhesion of glass ionomer cement to dentin, J Contemp Dent Pract, 10(4), 9-16, July 2009.
 
[73]  Yamamoto K, Kojima H, Tsutsumi T, Oguchi H, Effects of tooth-conditioning agents on bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant to enamel, J Dent, 31(1), 13-18, Jan 2003.
 
[74]  Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR, Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics, J Prosthet Dent, 81(2), 135-141, Feb 1999.
 
[75]  Sidhu SK, Sheriif M, Watson TF, The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations, J Dent Res, 76(8), 1495-1501, Aug 1997.
 
[76]  Sidhu SK, Watson TF, Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements, Int J Prosthodont, 3(5), 425-429, Sep-Oct 1990.
 
Manuscript template