Laboratory Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever using Widal and Blood culture Methods in Aba, Southeastern Nigeria

Ezeigbo O.R.^1, , Agomoh N. G.¹ and Asuoha-Chuks N.¹

¹Department of Biology/Microbiology, Abia State Polytechnic, Aba, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Ezeigbo O.R., Agomoh N. G. and Asuoha-Chuks N.. Laboratory Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever using Widal and Blood culture Methods in Aba, Southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Microbiological Research. 2015; 3(6):181-183. doi: 10.12691/ajmr-3-6-1

Abstract

The emergence of multidrug resistance strains of Salmonella typhi poses a big challenge to the eradication of typhoid fever. Typhoid fever shares similar transmission factors with malaria, and require careful and accurate laboratory diagnosis for effective treatments of patients. Increased request for Widal test as a quick diagnosis of typhoid fever has produced exaggerated results since typhoid fever and malaria often show mimicking symptoms even in laboratory diagnosis. The main objective of this study is to investigate the rate of infection of typhoid fever in Aba, southeastern Nigeria, using Widal test and blood culture methods. Widal and blood culture were carried out on all the samples. Out of 400 blood samples examined, comprising of 126 (31.5%) males and 274 (68.5%) females, 98 (24.5%) were tested positive for Salmonella typhi using the Widal test while the blood culture method only recorded 37 (9.3%). On age-related prevalence, the age bracket 31-40 years showed the highest prevalence rate for both methods with 23 (32.4%) for Widal test and 9 (12.7%) for blood culture method. Sex-related prevalence also showed that more males (34.9% and 11.1%) were infected with Salmonella typhi than females (19.7% and 8.4%) for Widal and blood culture methods respectively. The result of this study shows a significant mean difference (t-value = 2.95, p-value = 0.026) between Widal and Blood culture at 5% level of significance. The blood culture test was found to be more sensitive than the widal test. It is therefore recommended that the assumingly high incidence of the disease using Widal test will be greatly reduced if blood culture technique is routinely adopted as a baseline for the diagnosis of typhoid fever.

Keywords:
laboratory diagnosis typhoid fever widal test blood culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Uneke, C. J.”Concurrent malaria and typhoid fever in the tropics: diagnostic challenges and public health implications,” J. Vector Borne Dis. 45: 133-142, 2008.
[2]	Marathe, S. A., Lahiri, A., Negi, V. D. and Chakravortty. “Typhoid fever and vaccine development: a partially answered question. India J. Med. Res, 135: 161-169, 2012.
[3]	World Health Organization. Typhoid: WHO Position Paper, 83(6): 49-59. Geneva: WHO; 2008. Available at: http:// www.who.int/wer/2008/wer8306.pdf.
[4]	Udeze, A. O., Abdulrahman, F., Okonko, I. O. and Anibijuwon, I. I. “ Seroprevalence of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi among the first year students of University of Ilorin-Nigeria.” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 6(3): 257-262, 2010.
[5]	Raveendran, R., Datta, S. and Wattal, C. “Drug resistance in Salmonella typhi and Paratyphi A.” JIMSA, 23(1): 21-24, 2010.
[6]	Mweu, E and English, M. “Typhoid fever in children in Africa.” TropicalMedicine and International Health, 13(4): b532-540, 2008.
[7]	Buckle, G. C., Fischer Walker, C. L. and Black, R. E. “Typhoid fever and Paratyphoid fever: systematic review to estimate global morbidity and mortality for 2010”. Journalof global Health, 2(1), 2012, 2.
[8]	Aziz, T. and Haque, S.S. “Role of Widal test in the diagnosis of typhoid fever in context to other test.” American Journal of Biochemistry, 2(1): 16-18, 2012.
[9]	Alhassan, H. M., Shidali, N. N., Manga, S. B., Abdullahi, K and Hamid, K. M. “ Co-infection profile of Salmonella typhi and Malaria parasite in Sokoto-Nigeria.” Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology”, 2, 201, 13-20, 2012. Available at: http://www.gjset.org.
[10]	Mushayabasa, S., Bhunu, C. P. and Mhlanga, N. A. “Modeling the transmission dynamics of typhoid in malaria endemic setting.” International Journal of Application and Applied Mathematics, 9(1): 121-140, 2014.
[11]	Wain, J. and Hosoglu, S. “The laboratory diagnosis of enteric fever”. J Infect Dev Ctries., 2: 421-425. 2008.
[12]	Keddy, K.H., Sooka, A., Letsoalo, M.E., Hoyland, G, Chaignat, C.L., Morrissey, A.B. and Crump, J.A. “Sensitivity and specificity of typhoid fever rapid antibody tests for laboratory diagnosis at two sub-Saharan African sites”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89. 640-647, 2011.
[13]	Cheesebrough, M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. Cambridge University Press, UK, 2006, pp 62-70.
[14]	Alhassan, H.M., Shidali, N.N., Manga, S.B, Abdullahi, K and Hamid, K.M. “Co-infection profile of Salmonella typhi and malaria parasite in Sokoto-Nigeria”. Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 1ssue 2,201, 13-20, 2012.
[15]	Yagoub, H. A. “Comparison between the widal test and culture technique in the diagnosis of enteric fever in Khartoum State, Sudan,” African Journal of Bacteriology Research, 7(5): 56-59, 2015.
[16]	Prasanna P. “Co-infection of typhoid and malaria”. J. Med. Lab. Diagn., 2(3): 22-26, 2011.
[17]	Nwafia, W. C. and Nwafia, I. N. “A survey of typhoid fever epidemic in eastern Nigeria.” Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology, 2015, Open Access. Available online: www.omicsonline.org/proceedings/a-survey-oftyphoid-fever-epidemic-ineastern-nigeria-29281-html.