American Journal of Microbiological Research
ISSN (Print): 2328-4129 ISSN (Online): 2328-4137 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Microbiological Research. 2014, 2(6), 189-200
DOI: 10.12691/ajmr-2-6-5
Open AccessArticle

Bacteriological Assessement of Vegetables Cultivated in Soils Treated with Poultry Manure and the Manure-Treated Soil Samples

OBI C. N.1,

1Department of Microbiology, College of Natural Sciences, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria

Pub. Date: November 11, 2014

Cite this paper:
OBI C. N.. Bacteriological Assessement of Vegetables Cultivated in Soils Treated with Poultry Manure and the Manure-Treated Soil Samples. American Journal of Microbiological Research. 2014; 2(6):189-200. doi: 10.12691/ajmr-2-6-5


Bacteriological quality of four vegetables: waterleaf (W), pumpkin (P), cucumber (C) and tomatoes (T) cultivated in soils treated with poultry manure and the manure-treated soil samples (S1, S2, S3 and S4) were assessed using standard microbiological methods. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp., Bacillus spp, Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp were recovered from the soil and vegetable samples. The total bacterial count of the soil samples ranged from 1.75×109 (S3) to 5.9×104cfu/ml (S4) while the total bacterial count for the vegetable samples ranged from 2.65×109 (P) to 1.50×105cfu/ml (W). The total coliform count of the soil samples ranged from 1.65×107(S3) to 6.9×104cfu/ml (S4) while that of the vegetable samples ranged from 1.20×108(P) to 7.2×105cfu/ml (W). S1 was significantly different from S2 and S4 for the total bacteria count for the soil samples while P and W were significantly different for the vegetable samples (P< 0.05). For Salmonella-Shigella plate counts, S1 and S4 were significantly different and S2 and S3 were same (P< 0.05); while for the vegetable samples, P, W, C and T were significantly different (P< 0.05). S1, S2, S3, and S4 were significantly different for the total coliform count for the soil samples and same for P, W and C (P<0.05). Sensitivity screening for the isolates showed that Bacillus spp was most sensitive to Ofloxacin (25mm) while Staphylococcus aureus was most sensitive to Ofloxacin (22mm). Shigella was most sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (25mm) while E. coli showed highest sensitivity to Ciproflacin (25mm) and Ofloxacin (25mm). In addition, Klebsiella spp was most sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (23mm) and Ofloxacin (23mm) and Salmonella showed resistance to all the antibiotics. This study demonstrated that there is a high level of microbial contamination associated with the cultivation of vegetables in soils in which organic manure has been applied to which is of risk to the consumers.

bacterial pathogens contamination poultry manure soil vegetables

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Abdelnoor, A. M., Batshoun, R and Roumani, B. M. (1983). The bacterial flora of fruits and vegetables in Lebanon and the effect of washing on the bacterial content. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., I. Abt. Orig. B. 177:342-349.
[2]  Amoah, P., Drechsel, P., Abaidoo, R. C and Abraham, E. M. (2009): Improving food hygiene in Africa where vegetables are irrigated with polluted water. Regional Sanitation and Hygiene Symposium. 21: 3-5.
[3]  Baker, F. J and Breach. M. R. (1980): Medical Microbiology Techniques (1st ed.). Butter worths and co. (publishers) ltd. London. Pp 547.
[4]  Beuchat, C. R. (1995). Pathogenic microorganisms associated with fresh produce. Journal of Food Protection. 59(2): 204-216.
[5]  Beuchat, L. R. (1998). Pathogenic microorganisms associated with fresh produce. J. Food Prot. 59: 204-216.
[6]  Beuchat, L. R. (2002). Ecological factors influencing survival and growth of human pathogens on raw fruits and vegetables. Microbes Infect. 4: 413-423.
[7]  Buck, J. W., Walcott, R. R and Beuchat, L. R. (2003). Recent trends in microbiological safety.of fruits and vegetables. Plant Health Progress. 10: 1094.
[8]  Carmo, L. S., Cummings, C., Linardi V. R., Dias, R. S., Souza, J. M., Sena, M. J., Santos, D. A., Shupp, J. W., Pereira, R. K and Jett, M. (2004): A case study of a massive Staphylococcal food poisoning incident. Foodborne Pathog.Dis. 1: 241-246.
[9]  Cheesbrough, M. (2000): District laboratory practice in Tropical Countries. Part 2. Cambridge University Press. U.K. Pp 62-70.
[10]  Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute, CLSI. (2009). Performance for antimicrobial susceptibility. 10th edition. Vol 29: Pp1-3.
[11]  Cowan, S. T. and steel, K.J. (1985): Manual for the identification of medical Bacteria. Cambridge University press. 45-60.
[12]  Djoussé, L., Arnett, D. K., Coon, H., Province, M. A., Moore, L. L and Ellison, R. C. (2004): Fruit and vegetable consumption and LDL cholesterol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 79: 213-217.
[13]  Fisher, T. L and Golden, D. A. (1998). Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground apples used in cider production. J. Food Prot. 61:1372-1374.
[14]  Fredlund, H., Back, E., Sjoberg, L and Tornquist, E. (1987). Watermelon as a vehicle of transmission of shigellosis. Scand. H. Infect. Dis., 19:219-219.
[15]  Houang, E., Bodnaruk, P and Ahmet, Z. (1991). Hospital green salads and the effects of washing them. J. Hosp. Infect., 17:125-131.
[16]  John, J. H and Ziebland, S. (2004): Reported barriers to eating more fruit and vegetables before and after participation in a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative study. Health Edu. Res. 19: 165-74.
[17]  Kalia, A and Gupta, R. P. (2006). Handbook of Fruit and Fruit processing. Blackwell publishing. Pp 3-28.
[18]  Kudva, I. T., Blanch, K and Hovde, C. J. (1998). Analysis of Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival in ovine and bovine manure and manure slurry. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 64: 3166-3174.
[19]  Maboko, M. M. and Du Plooy, C. P. (2008). Evaluation of crisp head lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L.) for winter production in a soilless production system. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2(10): 113-117.
[20]  Macklin, K. S., Hess, J. B., Bilgili, S. F and Norton, R. A. (2005). Bacterial levels of pine shavings and sand used as poultry litter. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:238-245.
[21]  Mullins, G. L. (2002). An investigation in Poutry manure. Poultry Virginia Tech Pub. No. 424-434.
[22]  Ofor, M. O., Okorie, V. C., Ibeawuchi, I. I., Ihejirika, G. O., Obilo, O. P and Dialoke, S. A. (2009): Microbial Contaminants in Fresh Tomato Wash Water and Food Safety Considerations in South-Eastern Nigeria. Life Sci. J.1:80-82
[23]  Pell, A. N. (1997). Manure and microbes: public and animal health problem. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2673-2681.
[24]  Ray, B and Bhunia, A. K. (2007). Fundamental Food Microbiology. 4th Edn.,CRC Press, USA., p 492.
[25]  Riboli, E and Norat, T. (2003): Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78: 559S-69S.
[26]  Schefferle, H. E. (1995). The microbiology of built up poultry litter. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 28(3):403-411.
[27]  Solomon, H. M., Kautter, D. A., Lilly, T and Rhodehamel, E. J. (1990). Outgrowth of Clostridium botulinum in shredded cabbage at room temperature under modified atmosphere. J. Food Prot., 53:831-833.