American Journal of Microbiological Research
ISSN (Print): 2328-4129 ISSN (Online): 2328-4137 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Microbiological Research. 2019, 7(1), 12-18
DOI: 10.12691/ajmr-7-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Different PCR Techniques in Diagnosis of Camel (Camellus Dromedary) Brucellosis in Sudan

Muna O. Elhaj1, , Taha Abdelnassir A.2 and El Sanousi Enaam3

1Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Khartoum, Sudan

2Veterinary Laboratory Unit, Dubai Municipality

3Department of Preventive Medicine and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum

Pub. Date: January 21, 2019

Cite this paper:
Muna O. Elhaj, Taha Abdelnassir A. and El Sanousi Enaam. Evaluation of Different PCR Techniques in Diagnosis of Camel (Camellus Dromedary) Brucellosis in Sudan. American Journal of Microbiological Research. 2019; 7(1):12-18. doi: 10.12691/ajmr-7-1-2


Fifteen tissue samples of lymph nodes and spleens from Brucella sero-positive camels were subjected to Four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which were, abortus melitensis ovis suis (AMOS) PCR, Bruce-ladder multiplex PCR, Multilocus Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (MLVA) and the Real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Extraction of Brucella DNA from tissue samples was done by heat, which was found to be satisfactory for conduction of the tests. Brucella species could be distinguished according to the banding pattern and the amplification fragment length polymorphisms which is a diagnostic tool of specific strains. In this study, we evaluated the performances of newly designed real-time PCR assays using TaqMan probes and targeting the insertion sequence IS711, for the detection of Brucella at genus level. Real-time PCR assays are easy-to-use, produce results faster than conventional PCR systems while reducing DNA contamination risks. The IS711-based real-time PCR assay is specific and highly sensitive and appears as an efficient and reproducible method for the rapid and safe detection of the genus Brucella. MLVA assay has the same advantages of multiplex PCR beside it can differentiate Brucella isolates on biovar level (genotyping). Bruce-ladder PCR assay is recommended for testing the seed cultures commonly used in the production of living Brucella vaccines (Rev-1, S19 and RB51) and in evaluating them in quality control laboratories and also in identification and differentiation of Brucella isolates. PCR techniques are recommended to be used for identification of Brucella instead of isolation, which is dangerous and complex.

Brucellosis PCR AMOS RT-PCR MLVA and Bruce-ladder multiplex

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Bang, B. (1897). The etiology of epizootic abortion. J. Comp. Path. Therap., 10: 125-149.
[2]  Meyer KF. & Shaw EB. (1920). A comparison of the morphologic, cultural and biochemical characteristics of B. abortus and B. melitensis. J. Infect. Dis., Vol. 27, (1920), pp. (173-184).
[3]  Dafalla, E. N. (1962). Incidence of animal and human brucellosis in the Sudan.Sudan J. Vet. Sci. and Anim. Husb., 3 (2): 80-88.
[4]  Fekete A; Bantle JA; Halling SM; Sanborn MR. (1990). Preliminary development of a diagnostic test for Brucella using polymerase chain reaction. J. Appl. Bacteriol; vol. 69(2), 216-27.
[5]  Romero, C. et al. (1995). Specific detection of Brucella DNA by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol., Vol. 33, (1995). pp. (615-617).
[6]  Nimri LF. (2003). Diagnosis of recent and relapsed cases of human brucellosis by PCR assay.BMC Infect Dis; 3: 5. Nonphagocytic Cells In Vitro. Infection and Immunity, Vol. 58, No. 7, (2003), pp. (2320-2328).
[7]  Baily, G. G; Krahn, J. B; Drasar, B. S.; Stoker, N. G. (1992). Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. J. Tro.Med. Hyg, 95: 271-5.
[8]  Morata, P. et al. (1999b). Post treatment follow-up of brucellosis by PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol., Vol. 37, pp. (4163-4166).
[9]  Queipo-Ortuno, M. I. et al. (2005).Comparison between Light Cycler Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay with serum and PCR enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay with whole blood samples for the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Clin Infect. Dis. Vol. 40, (2005), pp. (260-264).
[10]  C. Hänsel, K. Mertens, M. C. Elschner, F. Melzer (2015). Novel real-time PCR detection assay for Brucella suis. Vet Rec Open 2015; 2: e000084.
[11]  Bricker, B. J. and Halling, S. M. (1995). Enhancement of the Brucella AMOS PCR assay for differentiation of Brucella abortus vaccine strains S19 and RB51. J. Clin. Microbiol., 33, 1640-1642.
[12]  Bricker, B.J., Ewalt, D.R., Olsen, S.C. and Jensen, A.E. (2003). Evaluation of the Brucella abortus species-specific polymerase chain reaction assay, an improved version of the Brucella AMOS polymerase chain reaction assay for cattle. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 15, 374-3783.
[13]  López-Goñi, I., García-Yoldi, D., Marín, C. M., de Miguel, M. J., Muñoz, P. M., Blasco, J. M., Jacques, I., Grayon, M. Cloeckaert, A., Ferreira, A. C., Cardoso, R., Corrêa de Sá, M. I., Walravens, K., Albert, D., Garin-Bastuji, B. (2008). Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) for molecular typing of all Brucella species and of the vaccine strains. J.Clin. Microbiol., 46, 3484-3487.
[14]  Le Flèch e P., Jacques I., Grayon M., Al Dahouk S., Bouchon P., Denoeud F., Nockler K., Neubauer H., Guilloteau L.A. and Vergnaud G. (2006). Evaluation and selection of tandem repeat loci for a Brucella MLVA typing assay. BMC Microbiol., 6, 9.
[15]  Bounaadja, L., Albert D., Chenais B., Henault S., Zygmunt M.S., Poliak S., and Garin-Bastuji B., (2009). Real-time PCR for identification of Brucella spp.: A comparative study of IS711, bcsp31 and per target genes. Vet. Microbiol., 137:156-164.
[16]  Bricker, B. J. (2002). PCR as a diagnostic tool for brucellosis, Vet. Microbiol., 90, 435-446.
[17]  Ewalt,D.R. and Bricker B.J. (2003). Identification and differentiation of Brucella abortus field and vaccine strains by BaSS-PCR. In: Methods in Molecular Biology, Volume 216: PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens: Methods and Protocols, Saches K. and Frey J., eds. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 97-108.
[18]  Vladimira Hinić, Isabelle Brodard, Andreas Thomann, Milena Holub, Raymond Miserez and Carlos Abril (2009). IS 711-based real-time PCR assay as a tool for detection of Brucella spp. in wild boars and comparison with bacterial isolation and serology.
[19]  KHAMESIPOUR Faham, RAHIMI Ebrahim, SHAKERIAN Amir, DOOSTI Abbas, MOMTAZ Hassan (2014). Molecular study of the prevalence of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis in the blood and lymph node samples of slaughtered camels by polymerase chain reaction. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd, 64 2: 245-256.
[20]  Gwida, M. M., El-Gohary, A. H, Melzer, F., Tomaso, H., Rösler, U. and Wernery, U., Wernery, R., Elschner, MC, Khan, I, Eickhoff, M., Schoner, D. andNeubauer, H. (2011). Comparison of diagnostic tests for the detection of Brucells spp. in camel sera. BMC Research notes, 4: 525.