American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-4102 ISSN (Online): 2328-4110 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajme Editor-in-chief: Kambiz Ebrahimi, Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2017, 5(5), 175-198
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-5-5-1
Open AccessArticle

Graphite-Epoxy Composite Design for Aircraft Wing Skin Using Computational Techniques - Part II

Akindapo Jacob Olaitan1, and Johnson-Anamemena Nnaemeka, Garba Danladi King1

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria

Pub. Date: September 25, 2017

Cite this paper:
Akindapo Jacob Olaitan and Johnson-Anamemena Nnaemeka, Garba Danladi King. Graphite-Epoxy Composite Design for Aircraft Wing Skin Using Computational Techniques - Part II. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2017; 5(5):175-198. doi: 10.12691/ajme-5-5-1

Abstract

This present work is on graphite-epoxy design for light weight high performance structure of an aircraft wing skin using computational technique. MATLAB MuPAD software was used to derive an analytical model for aircraft wing loads using symbolic computation to estimate the shear force acting on the wings while Autodesk Simulation Composite Design and ANSYS 14 Mechanical APDL (ANSYS Parametric Design Language) software were used to design and analyze the idealized composite structures of the wing skin. An idealized structure such as a flat plate which is a good approximation for the purposes of preliminary design and analysis was first developed using Autodesk Simulation Composite Design. After which, finite element analysis was also employed using ANSYS 14 Mechanical APDL to provide progressive failure analyses of the graphite-epoxy composite structures in order to determine the in-plane shear stress, displacement and other desired mechanical properties that would aid in material selection during fabrication and manufacturing. This investigation reveals that to withstand shear force of 3,000N for wing skin laminates designs, High Modulus (HM) and Ultra Modulus (UM) with [(+/-45)s] stacking sequence offers the best maximum shear stress output of 0.1991010 N/m2 prior to delamination. For failure prediction, Low Modulus (LM) and Ultra Modulus (UM) with [(+/-45)s] design has the best property prior to failure at 0.4991010 N/m2. HM and UM with [(+/-45/0/90)s] stacking sequence demonstrates the least compressive deformation of 0.004195m.

Keywords:
aircraft wing skin epoxy graphite high modulus low modulus ultra modulus

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Airbus, “A380 The best solution for 21st century growth”. [Online]. http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/passengeraircraft/a380family/. Retrieved November 21, 2015.
 
[2]  Akindapo J.O., Johnson-Anamemena N., and Garba D.K., (2017); “Graphite-epoxy Composite Design for Aircraft Wing Spar Using Computational Techniques – Part I”, American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 4, 117-127.
 
[3]  ANSYS, Inc., (2013); “ANSYS Mechanical APDL Structural Analysis Guide,” vol. Release 15, pp. 461-468.
 
[4]  Axel F., (2008); “Airbus A380:Solutions to the Aerodynamic Challenges of Designing the World’s Largest Passenger Aircraft,” in Royal Aeronautical Society, Hamburg Branch / DGLR / VDI / HAW, Hamburg, pp. 9-10.
 
[5]  Carl Zweben. Wiley Online Library (COMPOSITE MATERIALS). [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118985960.meh110/pdf. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
 
[6]  James A., Craig C., Phil Y., Ryan L., and James L., (2010); “Airframe Wingbox Preliminary Design and Weight Prediction”. Hampton, Virginia, USA: Society of Allied Weight Engineers, (SAWE).
 
[7]  Dan Doherty, “Toolbox, Analytical Modeling of Aircraft Wing Loads Using MATLAB and Symbolic Math”. [Online]. https://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/articles/analytical-modeling-of-aircraft-wing-loads-using-matlab-and-symbolic-math-toolbox.html. Retrieved May 18, 2016.
 
[8]  Department of Defense Handbook, (2002); “Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design and Analysis,” vol. 3, pp. 2-1 to 2-15.
 
[9]  Fabrice B., (2015); “Global Market Forecast (Flying by Numbers 2015 2034), We Are Focused on our Long-Term Future More than Ever Before,” no. 2, pp. 032-033.
 
[10]  Martin H., (2003); “Composite Aircraft Design”, 5th ed., Ed. Monterey, California: Martin Hollmann.
 
[11]  Shabeer K.P. and Murtaza M. A., (2013); “Optimization of Aircraft Wing with Composite Material,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 2471-2477.
 
[12]  Sudhir R. K. and Sujatha Y., (2015); “Design and Analysis of Aircraft Wing,” International Journal and Magazine of Engineering, Technolog, Management and Research , vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1480-1487.
 
[13]  Suresh K. J., Vijaya K. R. K., and Sidda R. B., (2013); “Prediction of Deflection and Stresses of Laminated Composite Plate with an Artificial Neural Network Aid,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 393-413.
 
[14]  Wahab U. M., Riaz A., Iqbal R. and Hassan N. K., [Online]. http://www.wseas.us/e-ibrary/conferences/2013/Brasov/ICAPS/ICAPS-01.pdf. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
 
[15]  William D. C. Jr. and David G. R., (2010); “Materials Science and Engineering an Introduction, 8th ed., William D. Callister Jr. and David G. Rethwisch, Ed. United States of America: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken.