American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-4102 ISSN (Online): 2328-4110 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajme Editor-in-chief: Kambiz Ebrahimi, Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2016, 4(5), 173-181
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-4-5-2
Open AccessArticle

Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Micro-Hardness Obtained by Cutting Carbon Steel with Abrasive WaterJet and Laser Beam Technologies

Mohammad S. Alsoufi1, , Dhia K. Suker1, Abdulaziz S. Alsabban1 and Sufyan Azam1

1Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA

Pub. Date: September 22, 2016

Cite this paper:
Mohammad S. Alsoufi, Dhia K. Suker, Abdulaziz S. Alsabban and Sufyan Azam. Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Micro-Hardness Obtained by Cutting Carbon Steel with Abrasive WaterJet and Laser Beam Technologies. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2016; 4(5):173-181. doi: 10.12691/ajme-4-5-2

Abstract

This paper presents a study conducted to determine the effect of abrasive waterjet (AWJ) and laser beam (LB) cutting technologies on surface roughness, Ra, and micro-hardness, µ-HV of the carbon steel samples. In this article, there is a brief discussion of the different ways of cutting carbon steel, such as AWJ cutting, as well as LB cutting. These techniques and their comparisons are illustrated in tables to highlight the differences between them regarding technical parameters, equipment, tools and economic performance and to select the best technology for cutting carbon steel. The results indicated that the average value of the surface roughness for the carbon steel sample was Ra = 7.54 µm, ±SD = 2.52 µm (for LB) and it was Ra = 6.34 µm, ±SD = 2.67 µm (for AWJ), for which the thickness was 6 mm. The difference was 1.2 µm. Also, the skewness, Rsk, and kurtosis, Rku, of the carbon steel sample after cutting by laser beam were 0.05 and 2.51, respectively. Whereas, Rsk and Rku of the carbon steel sample after cutting by abrasive waterjet were -0.04 and 2.69, respectively. Besides, the average value of micro-hardness for a carbon steel sample was HV = 548.82, ±SD = 72.4 (for LB) and it was HV = 525.70, ±SD = 72.5 (for AWJ). Surprisingly, the micro-hardness value for both cutting methods start roughly at the same value around 450 HV and then start to increase until the end of the cutting distance is reached. The difference was 23.12 HV. It also should be noted that, the effective case depth was about ~330 µm at 549 HV (for LB), and was about ~320 µm at 525 HV (for AWJ).

Keywords:
surface roughness micro-hardness abrasive waterjet laser beam

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 12

References:

[1]  Akkurt, A., Surface properties of the cut face obtained by different cutting methods from AISI 304 stainless steel materials. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2009, 16, p. 373-384.
 
[2]  Borkowski, J. and M. Sutowska, The quality of surface cut after high-pressure abrasive-water cutting. Journal of Machine Engineering, 2007, 7(3), p. 19-28.
 
[3]  Spadło, S., D. Krajcarz, and P. Młynarczyk, A comparison of laser cutting and water-jet cutting. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 2014, 66(2), p. 87-92.
 
[4]  Achanta, S., D. Drees, and J.-P. Celis, Friction from nano to macroforce scales analyzed by single and multiple-asperity contact approaches. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2008, 202(24), p. 6127-6135.
 
[5]  Birtu, C. and V. Avramescu, Abrasive water jet cutting - technique, equipment, performances. Nonconventional Technologies Review, 2012, 16(1), p. 40-46.
 
[6]  Chithirai, P. S. M. and S. R. N. Mohanna, Abrasive Waterjet Cutting Surfaces of Ceramics - An Experimental Investigation. International Journal of Applied Science, Technology and Engineering Research, 2012, 1(3), p. 52-59.
 
[7]  Momber, A. W. and R. Kovacevic, Principles of Abrasive Water Jet Machining. 1st ed. 1998, London: Springer-Verlag London.
 
[8]  Krajcarz, D., Comparison Metal Water Jet Cutting with Laser and Plasma Cutting, Procedia Engineering, 2014, 69, p. 838-843.
 
[9]  Mucha, Z., J. Zajac, and L. Gregova, Deformations in samples caused by irradiation of laser beam pulse CO2. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, p. 0003-6951.
 
[10]  Vincent Peržel, Sergej Hloch, Hakan Tozan, Mustafa Yagimli and Pavol Hreha, Comparative analysis of abrasive waterjet (AWJ) technology with selected unconventional manufacturing processes. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2011, 6(24), p. 5587-5593.
 
[11]  Zeleňák, Michal, Valíček, Jan, Klich, Jiří and Židková, Petra, COMPARISON OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS QUALITY CREATED BY ABRASIVE WATER JET AND CO2 LASER BEAM CUTTING. Tehnicki vjesnik, 2012, 19(3), p. 481-485.
 
[12]  Krajcarz, D., Comparison Metal Water Jet Cutting with Laser and Plasma Cutting. Procedia Engineering, 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, 2013. 69, p. 838-843.
 
[13]  Zowczak, W., Simplified analysis of temperature field for the laser welding process. Electrical Engineering Review, 2011, 7, p. 76-78.
 
[14]  D. K. Suker, M. S. Alsoufi, M. M. Alhusaini and S. A. Azam, Studying the Effect of Cutting Conditions in Turning Process on Surface Roughness for Different Materials. World Journal of Research and Review (WJRR), 2016, 2(4), p. 16-21.
 
[15]  Abdullah, R., A. Mahrous, and A. Barakat, Surface quality of marble machined by abrasive water jet. Cogent Engineering, 2016, 3(1), p. 1178626.
 
[16]  Alsoufi, M. S. and T. M. Bawazeer, The Effect of Aggressive Biological Materials on a Painted Automotive Body Surface Roughness. American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 2015, 3(2), p. 17-26.
 
[17]  Wang, J., Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Polymer Matrix Composites – Cutting Performance, Erosive Process and Predictive Models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1999, 15(10), p. 757-768.
 
[18]  Xu, S., Modelling the cutting process and cutting performance in AWJM with controlled nozzle oscillation, in Scholl of Engineering Systems, 2005, Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane. p. 1-238.
 
[19]  Azmir, M. A. and A. K. Ahsan, A study of abrasive water jet machining process on glass/epoxy composite laminate. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(20), p. 6168-6173.
 
[20]  Kantha Babu, M. and O. V. Krishnaiah Chetty, A study on the use of single mesh size abrasives in abrasive waterjet machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 29(5), p. 532-540.
 
[21]  Khan, A. A. and M. M. Haque, Performance of different abrasive materials during abrasive water jet machining of glass. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 191(1-3), p. 404-407.
 
[22]  Cosansu, G. and C. Cogun, An investigation on use of colemanite powder as abrasive in abrasive waterjet cutting (AWJC). Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2012, 26(8), p. 2371-2380.
 
[23]  Boud, F., Carpenter, C., Folkes, J. and Shipway, P. H. Abrasive waterjet cutting of a titanium alloy: The influence of abrasive morphology and mechanical properties on workpiece grit embedment and cut quality. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010, 210(15), p. 2197-2205.
 
[24]  Tani, Giovanni, Tomesani, Luca, Campana, Giampaolo and Fortunato, Alessandro, Quality factors assessed by analytical modelling in laser cutting. Thin Solid Films, 2004, 453-454, p. 486-491.
 
[25]  Wolfgang, Schulz, Vadim, Kostrykin, Markus, Nießen, Jan, Michel, Dirk, Petring, Ernst, W. Kreutz and Reinhart, Poprawe, Dynamics of ripple formation and melt flow in laser beam cutting. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1999, 32(11), p. 1219.
 
[26]  Tamsaout, T. and E.-H. Amara, Numerical investigation of hydrodynamics behaviour of melt layer during laser cutting of steel. Applied Physics A, 2014, 117(1), p. 383-388.
 
[27]  Hashish, M., On the Modeling of Surface Waviness Produced by Abrasive-Waterjets, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology, S. Andrews, Editor 1992, Scotland. p. 17-34.
 
[28]  Guo, N. S., H. Louis, and G. Meier, Surface structure and kerf geometry in abrasive water jet cutting: formation and optimization, in Proceedings of the 7th American Waterjet Conference, S. WA, Editor 1993, USA. p. 1-26.
 
[29]  Momber, A. W., H. Kwak, and R. Kovacevic, An alternative method for the evalution of the abrasive water jet cutting process in gray cast iron. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1997, 65(1-3), p. 65-72.
 
[30]  ARDELEAN, F. A., Study Regarding Modern Cutting Technologies. Nonconventional Technologies Review, 2011, 1, p. 11-16.
 
[31]  Srinivaas, M. t. Sramika, and M. Padmanabham, Comparison Between Two Tool Steel Materials HcHc and HSS Using Abrasive Water Jet Machining: The Effect of Standoff Distance and Feed Rate on Kerf Width and MRR. Advanced Engineering and Applied Sciences: An International Journal, 2016, 6(1), p. 8-10.
 
[32]  Arola, D., McCain, M. L., Kunaporn, S. and Ramulu, M., Waterjet and abrasive waterjet surface treatment of titanium: a comparison of surface texture and residual stress. Wear, 2001, 249(10-11), p. 943-950.
 
[33]  Akkurt, Surface Properties of Various Materials in Abrasive Water Jet, Comparative Examination of Hardness and Micro Structure Changes in Different Methods, in G. U. Science Department Institution. 2002, Ankara.
 
[34]  Akkurt, A., Experimental Investigation of the Surface Properties Obtained by Cutting Brass-353 (α+β) with an Abrasive Water Jet and other Cutting Methods. Materials and technology, 2014, 48 (5), p. 725-734.