American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-4102 ISSN (Online): 2328-4110 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajme Editor-in-chief: Kambiz Ebrahimi, Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2014, 2(7), 258-261
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-2-7-17
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Different Simulation Approaches in Ring-Core Method

František Menda1, , Patrik Šarga2, Tomáš Lipták2 and František Trebuňa1

1Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Košice, Slovakia

2Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechatronics, Košice, Slovakia

Pub. Date: November 06, 2014

Cite this paper:
František Menda, Patrik Šarga, Tomáš Lipták and František Trebuňa. Comparison of Different Simulation Approaches in Ring-Core Method. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2014; 2(7):258-261. doi: 10.12691/ajme-2-7-17

Abstract

Ring-Core, a semi-destructive method enables measurement of the residual stresses inside the material by the sensor attached at the top of the specimen. Such stress reconstruction requires proper determination of the calculation coefficients. Thus the simulation model for finite elements analyzes is created by means of two different commercial software. Subsequently both simulation results are compared experimentally by measurement on the specimen loaded by known uniaxial state of stress.

Keywords:
residual stress Ring-Core SolidWorks ANSYS FEM incremental method differential method

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  F. Menda, F. Trebuňa, P. Šarga: Determination of the Necessary Geometric Parameters of the Specimen in Ring-Core Method. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 486, p. 90. ISSN: 1662-7482.
 
[2]  F. Menda, F. Trebuňa, P. Šarga: Estimation of residual stress field uniformity when using the Ring-Core method. Advanced Materials Research Vol. 996 (2014) pp 325-330.
 
[3]  E. Valentini, A. Benincasa, L. Bertelli: An automatic system for measuring residual stresses by Ring-core method. Italian Stress Analysis Association, 40th National convention, University of Palermo, 2011.
 
[4]  ASTM International Designation E 837‐13a: Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole‐Drilling Strain Gauge Method, United States, 2013, 16 p.
 
[5]  B. Zuccarello: Optimization of Depth Increment Distribution in the Ring‐Core Method. Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design. July 1996, Vol. 31, no. 4, p. 251‐258.
 
[6]  F. Trebuňa, F. Šimčák, Handbook on experimental mechanics (In Slovak “Príručka experimentálnej mechaniky”), first ed., Košice SjF TU, 2007, 1526 p.
 
[7]  M.Barsanti et al., Integral method coefficients and regularization procedure for the ring-core residual stress measurement technique. Advanced Materials Research Vol. 996(2014) pp 331-336.
 
[8]  D. von Mirbach: Hole-Drilling Method for Residual Stress Measurement- Consideration of Elastic-Plastic Material Properties. Materials Science Forum, vol. 768-769, pp. 174-181, 2013.
 
[9]  P. Šarga, F. Menda, Analysis of Measuring Chain for Evaluating Residual Stresses by Ring-Core Method, In: American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1, no. 7 (2013), p. 313-317.
 
[10]  F. Menda et al., SolidWorks API for Ring-Core Simulations, In: SAMI 2014: IEEE 12th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics: proceedings: January 23-25, 2014, Herľany, Slovakia.