American Journal of Information Systems
ISSN (Print): 2374-1953 ISSN (Online): 2374-1988 Website: Editor-in-chief: Sergii Kavun
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Information Systems. 2018, 6(1), 13-22
DOI: 10.12691/ajis-6-1-3
Open AccessCase Study

An Infrastructural Analysis of a Crowdsourcing Tool for Environmental Research

Selamawit Molla Fossum1, , Susana Lopez-Aparicio2 and Håvard Vika Røen2

1Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

2Norwegian Institute for Air Research Institute, kjeller, Norway

Pub. Date: May 04, 2018

Cite this paper:
Selamawit Molla Fossum, Susana Lopez-Aparicio and Håvard Vika Røen. An Infrastructural Analysis of a Crowdsourcing Tool for Environmental Research. American Journal of Information Systems. 2018; 6(1):13-22. doi: 10.12691/ajis-6-1-3


In this paper, we adopt information infrastructure design principles and concepts from the theory of critical mass to analyze and evaluate the socio-technical conditions that hindered the successful bootstrapping processes of a crowdsourcing tool for environmental research. The crowdsourcing tool was designed to improve the estimation of emissions from burning wood for residential heating in urban areas in Norway by collecting geolocation data on wood consumption and stove types. Our analysis identifies three groups of users, namely scientists, wood consumers (end users), and key stakeholders, that the IT capability of the tool needs to support. At this stage, we determined that the tool was more useful to the scientists than the other two groups, which was attributed to its low uptake. We uncovered various underlying issues through further analysis of means by which the tool becomes useful to key stakeholders. One particular issue concerned the tension between existing data collection practices, which are based on statistical methods, and the nature of crowdsourcing, which is based on the principle of open call with no sampling techniques. From our analysis, we concluded that developing crowdsourcing tools for research requires increasing the tool’s benefits for key stakeholders by addressing these underlying issues. Inferring from the theory of critical mass for collective action, we recommend that developers of crowdsourcing tools include a function that allows users to view the contributions of other users.

crowdsourcing citizen science information infrastructure design principles IS evaluation

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Hanseth, O. and M. Aanestad, Design as bootstrapping. On the evolution of ICT networks in health care. Methods of information in medicine, 2003. 42(4): p. 384-391.
[2]  Hanseth, O. and K. Lyytinen, Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of information technology, 2010. 25(1): p. 1-19.
[3]  Howe, J., Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. 2008: Random House.
[4]  Estellés-Arolas, E. and F. González-Ladrón-De-Guevara, Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, 2012. 38(2): p. 189-200.
[5]  Brabham, D.C., Crowdsourcing. 2013: Wiley Online Library.
[6]  Fossum, S.M., An institutional perspective on health information systems’ standardization: multiple case studies, in Department of Informatics. 2016, University of Oslo: Oslo.
[7]  Augar, N. and M. Fluker. Developing social media for community based environmental monitoring. 2014. ACIS.
[8]  Brabham, D.C., Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 2009. 8(3): p. 242-262.
[9]  Henriques, J.J., et al. Crowd-sourcing urban air-quality in developing countries through open source technologies. in Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 2013 IEEE. 2013. IEEE.
[10]  Heaton, L., et al., Participatory Science: Encouraging public engagement in ONEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2016. 6(1): p. 1-22.
[11]  Shahid, A.R. and A. Elbanna. The Impact of Crowdsourcing on Organisational Practices: The Case of Crowdmapping. in ECIS. 2015.
[12]  Gharesifard, M. and U. Wehn, To share or not to share: Drivers and barriers for sharing data via online amateur weather networks. Journal of Hydrology, 2016. 535: p. 181-190.
[13]  Fröhlich, S., et al. BikeNow: a pervasive application for crowdsourcing bicycle traffic data. in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct. 2016. ACM.
[14]  Baruch, A., A. May, and D. Yu, The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016. 64: p. 923-931.
[15]  Aitamurto, T., H. Landemore, and J. Saldivar Galli, Unmasking the crowd: participants’ motivation factors, expectations, and profile in a crowdsourced law reform. Information, Communication & Society, 2017. 20(8): p. 1239-1260.
[16]  Konomi, S.i. and T. Sasao. Crowd geofencing. in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on IoT in Urban Space. 2016. ACM.
[17]  Brovelli, M.A., M. Minghini, and G. Zamboni, Public participation in GIS via mobile applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016. 114: p. 306-315.
[18]  Antelio, M., et al. Qualitocracy: A data quality collaborative framework applied to citizen science. in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. 2012. IEEE.
[19]  Hassanzadeh, R. and Z. Nedovic-Budic, Identification of earthquake disaster hot spots with crowd sourced data, in Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management. 2013, Springer. p. 97-119.
[20]  Davami, E. and G. Sukthankar. Evaluating trust-based fusion models for participatory sensing applications. in Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. 2014. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
[21]  Degrossi, L.C., et al. Flood Citizen Observatory: a crowdsourcing-based approach for flood risk management in Brazil. in SEKE. 2014.
[22]  Fonte, C., et al., VGI quality control. ISPRS Geospatial week 2015, 2015: p. 317-324.
[23]  Chiu, C.-M., T.-P. Liang, and E. Turban, What can crowdsourcing do for decision support? Decision Support Systems, 2014. 65: p. 40-49.
[24]  Grindley, P., Standards, strategy, and policy. 1995.
[25]  Hanseth, O. and E. Monteiro, Understanding information infrastructure. Unpublished Manuscript, Retrieved on 6th September from http://heim. ifi. uio. no/~ oleha/Publications/bok. pdf, 1998.
[26]  Aanestad, M., et al., Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Base, in Information Infrastructures within European Health Care. 2017, Springer. p. 25-33.
[27]  Aanestad, M. and T.B. Jensen, Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2011. 20(2): p. 161-176.
[28]  Dahlbom, B. and L. Mathiassen, Computers in context: The philosophy and practice of systems design. 1993: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
[29]  Jensen, T.B., Design principles for achieving integrated healthcare information systems. Health informatics journal, 2013. 19(1): p. 29-45.
[30]  Marwell, G. and P. Oliver, The critical mass in collective action. 1993: Cambridge University Press.
[31]  Oliver, P., G. Marwell, and R. Teixeira, A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American journal of Sociology, 1985. 91(3): p. 522-556.
[32]  Kahan, D.M., The logic of reciprocity: Trust, collective action, and law. Michigan Law Review, 2003. 102(1): p. 71-103.
[33]  Yin, R., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications. California, USA, 2009.
[34]  Fossum, S.M., Potentials and challenges of using crowdsourcing for urban environmental sustainability, in NTNU Sustainability science conference: transitions to sustainable systems. 2017, NTNU Norwegian University pf Science and Technology: Trondheim, Norway.
[35]  Von Schomberg, R., A vision of responsible innovation. 2013.
[36]  Strandbakken, P., R. Larvik, and H. Throne-Holst, iResponse: Crowdsourcing; An Approach to Urban Environmental Governance. 2017, Consumption Research Norway: Oslo, Norway.
[37]  BBC. Norway's NRK broadcasts 12 hours wood buring program. 2013.
[38]  Levander, T. and S. Bodin, Controlling Emissions from Wood Burning: Legislation and Regulations in Nordic Countries to Control Emissions from Residential Wood Burning An examination of Past Experience. 2014: Nordic Council of Ministers.
[39]  López-Aparicio, S., et al., Public participation GIS for improving wood burning emissions from residential heating and urban environmental management. Journal of environmental management, 2017. 191: p. 179-188.